NOTE AB - Swedish contract electronics

There are already forum threads on electronics contract manufacturers such as the Finnish Incap and the Norwegian Kitron ASA, so let’s open a dedicated thread for the Swedish company NOTEn as well.

Basic Information About the Company:

Like Incap, NOTE is an electronics contract manufacturer—specifically, one that fits into Europe’s top twenty in terms of size. It manufactures its customers’ products and parts of them. Therefore, it is an operator to which manufacturers of, for example, EV chargers or surveying instruments outsource their production, leaving tasks primarily related to sales, marketing, etc., to NOTE’s customer. Increasingly, R&D, logistics, maintenance, servicing, and more are also being outsourced to NOTE.

About half of the net sales come from PCB assembly, and half from box-build, which roughly means manufacturing complete products ready for end-user needs.

NOTE has four production facilities in Sweden, one in Hyvinkää, one in China, one in Estonia, and three in the UK. Historically, acquisitions have played a quite significant role, as can be seen from one of the images below.

Customers and Products

NOTE’s product/customer portfolio is divided into four parts: Industrial, Medtech, Greentech, and Communication. Industrial is clearly the largest segment, and according to NOTE’s management, this segment could be divided into countless sub-segments because the overall picture is so vast. All segments are reportedly performing well, and there is no need to prioritize one segment over another for better profitability, for instance. NOTE’s CEO mentioned at the December 2022 Capital Markets Day that, for example, in the medtech segment they have a great pipeline which he believes will materialize into figures in the near future. On the other hand, he also said that greentech, for example, will also grow rapidly, and they have been somewhat disappointed with this segment’s growth figures in 2022.

Typically for an EMS provider, NOTE says very little about its customers and rarely mentions them by name. However, some references can be found on their website, such as ChargeAmps, which manufactures EV chargers, and Trimble, which manufactures surveying technology. It is worth noting, however, the following excerpt from the 2021 annual report:

Generally speaking, NOTE has a diversified customer base where no single customer (group) represents more than 7% (6%) of total group sales.

For comparison, it can be mentioned that Incap’s largest customer, Victron Energy, accounted for over 60 percent of its total net sales, making it quite justified to say that present-day Incap lives and dies with Victron Energy. NOTE does not have this kind of customer dependency on a single customer.

NOTE—like presumably all companies nowadays—wants to be a close strategic partner to its customers. And it is probably true that the importance, influence, and share of the value chain of EMS providers are greater than before due to outsourcing trends. However, it is good to remember that these companies live under chronic profitability pressure, squeezed at the bottom by raw material and component sourcing and at the top by customer negotiating power. Large and established customers are often global players against whom an EMS provider may have very limited room to argue.

Business Development

NOTE’s share price has skyrocketed over the past ten years. Over the last five years, the stock return has probably been 50% per year, and annualized over ten years, presumably around forty percent.

The reason for this is, of course, largely the excellent development of the business. About ten years ago, net sales hovered around one billion SEK, whereas now it is roughly fourfold. The company was also unprofitable in some years during the early 2010s, whereas now it generates an EBIT margin of around 8-10 percent (cf. Incap’s 13-15%). I am not entirely sure if the NOTE of that era was even quite the same business-wise as today’s NOTE, but the development has been staggering nonetheless.

The company’s CEO, Johannes Lind-Widestam, has been at the helm for four years and stated that when he started, he didn’t believe a company like NOTE could grow organically by over 20 percent. Now, however, he sees that this is a completely normal growth rate for a good EMS provider, and there is nothing extraordinary about it.

So here are some figures on the business and its development:

  • Over 20% organic net sales growth for the past 5 years
  • EBIT-% raised from six to close to ten in five years
  • ROIC of 10-20 percent depending on the year

Interestingly, however, the gross profit margin is only around 13-14 percent, whereas at Incap it is somewhere above thirty percent. According to the CEO, the target is even “Incap-level” profitability, but with this gross margin, that is impossible. Therefore, there is still work to be done regarding profitability development, and even the official target of a 10 percent EBIT margin is already excellent for an EMS company. In this game, Incap is right at the cutting edge regarding profitability, and a bit beyond that.Addition 27 Jan 2023:
Correction to NOTE’s gross margin percentages. Due to NOTE’s reporting method, the gross margin already includes personnel costs. Removing these means that the gross margin for 2021 was actually 30.5% instead of the previously mentioned 13%. Consequently, NOTE’s gross margin is effectively already very close to Incap’s gross margin, and the most critical profitability comments in this opening post do not reflect reality. See the detailed information in the subsequent messages by Joonas and Mauri.

Acquisitions

The M&A market in the EMS sector is hotter than hot. Incap, NOTE, Kitron, and all the others are competing for the exact same targets. The market is consolidating strongly (Incap’s CMD had a good market overview).

The funny thing—though probably not for the buyers—is that everyone right now wants to buy EMS players that:

  • operate with growing and profitable modern technologies
  • have a flat hierarchy and are able to operate very independently and agilely
  • do not operate in cyclical sunset industries (e.g., traditional automotive)
  • are located in North America, Germany, or in some cases Eastern Europe
  • are not some poor-profitability turnaround stories
  • are not squeezed by old and bad customers
  • are neither too small nor too large

NOTE’s own principles for acquisitions can be found in the image below.

Perhaps it’s no wonder that Incap has been looking for acquisition targets for years, and NOTE has made maybe one acquisition per year. Apparently, it plans to continue at that same pace.

This image from NOTE’s CMD illustrates well how growth is sought first from current customers (usually large customers grow big), then from new customers, and only finally through acquisitions.

Outlook and Valuation

NOTE’s future looks bright (excerpted from the Q3/2022 report):

Successful new sales to new and current business customers, and continued healthy demand in all customer segments, were contributors to record-high order intake.

Uncertainties on the global market have quickly altered conditions in several sectors. We’re still seeing good opportunities to continue our positive progress. We have very strong order levels, with a range of exciting customers and projects in start-up phases. With our current market situation, we see good potential to achieve quarterly sales of SEK 1 billion for the first time ever, equivalent to growth of some 25%. For the full year 2022, this translates to sales of SEK 3.65 billion. We’re well positioned to achieve our long-term targets for growth, profitability and sustainability.

The M&A pipeline is said to be good.

NOTE’s financial targets for 2025 are as follows:

  • SEK 5 billion in revenue (2021: SEK 2.643 billion and in 2022 for three quarters SEK 2.649 billion)
  • 10% EBIT margin
  • at least 30% equity ratio

Regarding these targets, the CEO mentioned that there is supposedly some air in the revenue target and it can be reached through organic growth alone, even if there were some headwinds from the market. Quite a relaxed statement to make.

Valuations (figures taken directly from GuruFocus, so I won’t stake my life on them) for EMS players in general have been slightly elevated in recent years, but given the strong trend, this is entirely justified. In absolute terms, the multiples are not impossible if the promised growth continues.

From memory, the forward P/E for 2025 would be somewhere around 12 if those financial targets are met. For Incap, the figures are quite similar, and if I recall correctly, for Kitron as well. Personally, I would say that if Incap’s customer base were more diversified, it would deserve higher multiples than NOTE. It has delivered such massive organic growth and stellar profitability compared to other EMS players.

The 2022 financial statements and Q4/2022 earnings will be published right away next Monday, January 30, 2023, so we are in for an exciting time, even though we got a fairly comprehensive information package on the current situation at the CMD a month ago.

I don’t own any, and I haven’t done a detailed valuation yet. But here is a humanist analysis to kick off the discussion.

https://twitter.com/Salkku_Mauri/status/1616754258845773831?s=20

61 Likes

Glad you started this thread. We have a call with management on Monday after the report. I can post here if anything new or interesting comes up in addition to the points you mentioned above.

26 Likes

Hi Mauri!

Good points on Note.

Interestingly, the gross profit % is only around 13-14 percent, while for Incap it is somewhere over thirty percent.

This point caught my eye. Note reports its income statement by function, whereas Incap does it by nature of expense. This means that Note’s gross margin also includes the labor costs associated with the items sold or their parts. For Incap, on the other hand, the gross profit is a pure material margin. I’m fairly sure that Note’s gross margin is also in the 30-35% range, similar to other EMS companies.

38 Likes

@Joonas_Korkiakoski do my eyes deceive me, or have you returned to Inderes? In any case, it’s great to have you back on the forum :star_struck:

2 Likes

Hey MoneyWalker!

I haven’t returned; that watermark is just a relic of history. I’m sure it’ll fade away at some point!

9 Likes

Great catch. Indeed, that’s how it is. The difference between the gross margin (13%) and operating profit (< 10%) would be quite impossible if the costs of 1,300 employees had to be squeezed into that gap.

I looked at the 2021 annual report’s financial statements, and based on the information found there, I calculated a sales margin of 30.5% for 2021, which is actually starting to be right around Incap’s levels. This puts the most critical profitability notes in my opening post in a very different light. I’ll go ahead and make some small additions to the opening post so as not to mislead anyone.

Quickly calculated, at today’s share price (216 SEK) and trailing 12-month figures (i.e., Q4/21-Q3/22), NOTE is:

  • P/E 27.9
  • EV/S 1.9
  • EV/GB 6.1
  • EV/EBIT 21.7

I calculated these from the company’s own reports, although since personnel expenses were not broken down in the Q3/22 report, for example, I assumed a sales margin of 31%. Hopefully, these are more accurate than the previous figures.

Now that the CEO has mentioned that the current staff can already achieve significantly higher production and there is no need to increase the headcount, there is potential for the sales margin to rise even further. This would also make the hunt for an Incap-level operating profit margin significantly easier. This needs to be monitored in future reports.

To enable comparison, here are Incap’s figures from Inderes in the same post:

10 Likes

It’s worth taking this into account:

https://www.note-ems.com/en/press-releases/potential-bad-debt-affects-notes-profits-in-the-third-quarter/

→ Regarding one customer, Note made a provision of SEK 30m for bad debt in the Q3 quarter.

However, the company in question was acquired and business with Note continues:

https://www.note-ems.com/en/press-releases/resumed-business-with-the-customer-behind-notes-potential-bad-debt/

If the Q3 operating profit is adjusted by SEK 30 million, the trailing 12-month EV/EBIT is 19.5x. Of course, this also affects the other multiples you presented above.

13 Likes

Perhaps we should also add a person named Erik Stenfors to this thread. He founded Note in 1999. Then, in 2008, he founded a competitor called Hanza. The company is also listed. Hanza already generates almost as much revenue as Note, but the margin is lower. Hanza’s goal is to reach a revenue of SEK 5 billion by 2025 with an EBIT margin of at least 8%. The company’s EV today is approximately SEK 3.1 billion.

Erik Stenfors

Hanza Q3 2022

13 Likes

https://www.note-ems.com/en/press-releases/notes-year-end-report-2022/

In short, a great result:
-Sales increased by 28% to SEK 1,038 (814) million. Adjusted for acquisitions and currency effects, organic growth was 8%.

-Operating profit was SEK 129 (87) million and corresponded to an operating margin of 12.3% (10.6%).

Read more in the report :slight_smile:

4 Likes

Brief comments after the call. CEO and CFO were present.

  • The CEO has been with Note since 2018. He was also at Kitron from 2007-2010. Around that time, exit barriers were very low and customers had a lot of say. The situation has changed completely, and today their customer retention is 97-98%. Perhaps one customer per year might switch to another supplier. This situation naturally also helps with margins.

  • We talked about Kitron, Hanza, and Incap. Incap is the operator most similar to them. Kitron focuses on revenue growth but hasn’t managed to drive margins up, at least not yet. Regarding Incap, he mentioned that the company had difficult years just under 10 years ago and operations have been streamlined a lot since then. Like Note, they also keep the head office headcount small. Of course, future growth depends heavily on Victron. If Note’s CEO were Otto, he wouldn’t be able to sleep knowing one customer accounts for over 60% of revenue. But they certainly have a working network in India, and India suits them well. For Note, Europe is a good fit.

  • We also talked about several customers. New customers brought in business with a 17% margin in 2021, and this has not changed. This is why the margin is rising. In some negotiations involving really large volumes, the margin can be 10-12%. Here we are talking about SEK 500m orders. Otherwise, it’s higher.

  • They are actively looking for a target in Germany. It’s hard to get customers if there is no local staff and factory there. However, they don’t want automotive customers. The Czech Republic would also be nice because labor costs are a third of the prices in Estonia.

  • The only reason why the current 2025 targets would not be reached would be a large-scale war involving other countries in addition to Russia and Ukraine. Or a trade war where component availability would deteriorate significantly further.

  • Q4 2022 organic growth was only 8%. There is a good explanation for this. The UK EV Charging business decreased by more than 50% compared to Q4 2021. This lowered Greentech revenue compared to previous 2022 quarters. Otherwise, Greentech showed strong growth. So organic growth should accelerate significantly again in Q2 2023.

  • The CEO is excited about two things. The Customer Satisfaction Index was the highest ever. Way above the industry level. And second, they are currently streamlining production at every factory.

27 Likes

Here is the webcast by Financial Hearings on inderesTV.

11 Likes

Earnings webcast watched through once superficially, and I jotted down some messy notes in one go—no guarantees on their complete accuracy. For any unclear points, it’s worth listening to the link provided by Veppu yourself.

CEO Johannes Lind-Widestam:

  • It has been a turbulent environment. Inflation and foreign exchange rates have caused difficulties. The semiconductor situation has also remained challenging: in some areas things are back to normal, but for certain semiconductors, issues persist.
  • I notice I always start these with a bit of pessimism, but these are the things keeping me awake at night right now.
  • In any case, a fantastic quarter from us, even with headwinds from acquisitions and currency exchange rates.
  • Organic growth of 8 percent in Q4 might sound weak, but we had a strong comparison period behind us, and there was still 200 million in delays that didn’t make it into our numbers.
  • I’m not nervous at all about the Q4 organic growth figure, and we have good visibility for the year 2023.
  • Regarding guidance: some might think we are conservative, but our guidance is set such that we are confident we will beat it.
  • We are extremely excited about this report, as we achieved, among other things, our highest quarterly sales ever.

  • Very strong numbers for the full year 2022 despite the difficult component situation.
  • Our cash flow turned positive in Q4, but we are naturally not yet where we want to be regarding cash flow. Growth still eats up our cash flow, but we clearly see better cash flow in 2023 than in 2022. However, this is difficult to guide.
  • We continue to aim to increase our capacity and invest in our growth, so a positive cash flow trajectory enabling investments is extremely, extremely important.
  • A year ago we were told we wouldn’t be able to repeat our growth numbers (41%; 2021), and we didn’t quite manage that, but once again a fantastic year of growth for us (39%; 2022).
  • Underlying profitability figures describe our actual profitability better than reported figures, which include non-recurring expenses (spot materials, acquisitions, FX adjustments).
  • Our order backlog is impressive. Reduced order backlogs are already being reported across our industry, but we are not seeing that.
  • It is of course possible that our order backlog could shrink as well, but we have fairly good visibility for at least the first three quarters of the year, and we believe we have a chance to hit one billion in revenue already in the first quarter.
  • We are quite confident that we will execute an acquisition this year as well.

  • Performance in WE (Western Europe) was very strong, and all four of our production plants in Sweden are growing and improving our profitability.
  • Good development in Finland as well, and over 50 percent growth in Estonia.
  • 2021 saw fantastic growth in greentech, but specifically the removal of UK government subsidies for EV charging solutions created headwinds, after which the market has still not normalized, but in the long run greentech will do very well.
  • The Medtech side faced component difficulties, so in coming quarters we believe this segment will grow strongly as these issues ease.
  • Communications was quite weak in 2020–2021, so I don’t think we will reach 78 percent growth again in 2023 now that the comparison figures are tougher.
  • Industrial is a comprehensive, large, and important segment for us.
  • We have four segments, and our weakest segment grew 18 percent.
  • We have a well-diversified customer base, and individual customers are not too large (our largest customer accounts for just under 6% of revenue).
  • Our strength lies in being able to grow strongly across a very broad front, and this will continue to be our strength in the future.
  • Customer satisfaction increased, order backlog grew, etc.

  • Record capex of 80M into new equipment, and we plan to continue this with even greater stakes, as this year we have more manufacturing plants whose production we need to safeguard.
  • We use capex to keep personnel costs low.
  • Our approach is to invest in technological efficiency, which not everyone in this industry does; many focus on old equipment and large headcounts instead.
  • Over the last four years, we have tripled our production, while personnel is up only +40% (including acquisitions).
  • We purchased the production facility we were leasing in Torsby, because we believe expanding will be easier when we own it.

  • We have sufficient cash to run the business.
  • The NOTE Herrljunga story in the second half of 2022 was quite incredible: 154M SEK in output over six months, when we expected 140M SEK for the full year.
  • In my view, 2023 will be a very good year despite the difficult operating environment.
  • We have a vast number of new customers whom we will begin ramping into mass production over the coming years.
  • There is a lot of talk that EMS players are vulnerable to economic cycles, but we do not see this in our business right now, and when looking at the order books, everything looks very stable.
  • We believe we are where we want to be regarding our profitability trend.
  • We want people following us to understand that although we reported profitability figures that were perhaps slightly below some expectations, our profitability development is solid and was weighed down in 2022 by non-recurring items.

  • The market is growing very well, and there was good information on this just recently at Inission’s CMD, for example.
  • Europe is a very good place to be located, the US as well of course, but it’s hard to manage a business that is very far from headquarters.
  • Sooner or later, we will naturally also be in the US.
  • We will certainly continue to see minor quarter-to-quarter fluctuation in growth and profitability, but the overarching trend remains the same.
  • I wouldn’t be surprised if we achieved a 10 percent reported EBIT margin already this year.

Q&A:

Energy costs:

  • We don’t use very much energy, so even a doubling of energy costs won’t put us in a bad position.
  • However, I wouldn’t be surprised if solar panels started appearing on our roofs in increasing numbers.

EBIT gap west/rest:

  • Slightly more high volumes in the rest of the world segment.
  • I don’t think rest will catch up to west; the gap will likely remain around a couple of percentage points, but profitability in both will improve.

Risk of “overproduction”:

  • I don’t see this as a risk; the market is still in balance, or production capacity is even too low.
  • I see us being quite well balanced between supply and demand for at least the next 3–5 years.
  • I believe even a recession would only momentarily slow down production, after which output would bounce back onto the growth trend.

Capacity and large customers:

  • We have spare, new, and competitive capacity in Sweden at least for the current year.

Do you see 30–40% growth as sustainable for coming years:

  • Those numbers would require acquisitions from us.
  • The market isn’t cooling down, but achieving 40 percent growth in 2023 would be quite an exceptional stretch for us.
  • We will certainly beat the market growth (7–10 percent), but let’s see how Q1 goes before seeing what kind of growth numbers we can reach for the full year 2023.

Where is your growth coming from in Herrljunga:

  • We cannot discuss specific customers, but we have a large and impressive customer there that is growing rapidly, and we expect this development to continue in 2023, which we are meeting by investing in growth (my note: seemed to be some major MedTech customer that was also mentioned in the Q4 report).

The UK market and profitability there:

  • We have three factories there that are developing very differently.
  • In 2022 we were fairly close to the previous year’s profitability figures if we sum up our three factories there, but the development trends of individual production units diverged significantly (my note: at the CMD, Johannes said one production plant is in poor shape, but order books for 2/3 promise growth).

MedTech and the sustainability of its performance:

  • We secured a customer whose launch we had been waiting on for a couple of quarters, and in addition we have several good MedTech customer accounts currently underway.
  • We see that across the first 3 quarters of 2023 we will clearly beat our numbers from last year, and I believe that even though Q4/2022 was strong for MedTech, we will eventually clearly beat those comps as well.

Why expand specifically in Norrtälje and Torsby now?

  • Norrtälje has tripled production in 3.5 years and space has gotten tight.
  • Norrtälje will continue to grow very strongly for years, and we’ll see whether we can expand our factory there or need to build a second unit.
  • In Torsby, our customers have strong demand over a 3–5 year horizon.
  • We thought Torsby’s previous expansion in 2021 would have lasted longer, but that wasn’t the case because growth has been so strong. If everything goes according to plan, we will need additional capacity in Torsby within a couple of years.
  • In Herrljunga we have significant growth potential, and half the space there is currently vacant, which we plan to bring into use.
  • Something must also be done in Lund, as we are quite cramped there.
  • In Finland we are already running pretty tight and can manage maybe 1–2 years with current capacity.
  • In Estonia we are making improvements constantly and can grow there, but from 2024 at the latest, more space will be needed.

Closing remarks:

  • 2021 was an exceptional year, 2022 even stronger because the comparative figures were high.
  • I expect us to continue on the same path: growth will continue and profitability will improve.
  • Our customers are very optimistic.
  • We are taking the company to a new level once again.
  • 5 billion is an important milestone for us, and I will be surprised if we don’t reach it before 2025.
  • We will improve profitability, and there is still work to be done there.
  • Our fixed costs are now growing very slowly.
  • Overall, we are right where we want to be and are receiving plenty of praise from our customers for our performance.

I already skimmed through the report as well, and I’ll drop the highlights from that into the thread at some point too. Then onto entering the numbers into Excel.

All in all, though, things are looking good indeed. Starting to get the feeling of whether I should reduce Victron Energy risk at some point by shifting part of the Incap allocation into NOTE. In any case, the EMS market looks very attractive and I want to have exposure to it.

22 Likes

Now that we’ve been wearing sackcloth and ashes following yesterday’s Incap profit warning, our Western neighbor’s EMS competitor NOTE just keeps on going strong. Last year, I listened to management’s confident speeches with a bit of a “Sweden filter” on, but so far the numbers are going exactly where management promised.

Financial performance January-March

  • Sales increased by 28% to SEK 1,051 (821) million. Adjusted for acquisitions and currency effects, organic growth was 14%.
  • Operating profit increased by 48% to SEK 112 (76) million.
  • The operating margin widened by 1.4 percentage points to 10.7% (9.3%).
  • Profit after financial items was up by 50% to SEK 104 (69) million.
  • Profit after tax rose by 51% to SEK 85 (56) million, corresponding to SEK 2.92 (1.95) per share.
  • Cash flow after investments amounted to SEK 49 (9) million, or SEK 1.69 (0.31) per share. Adjusted for acquisition-related payments in the period, operating cash flow after investments was SEK 72 (9) million.

NOTE also recently acquired a small Bulgarian EMS shop (bottom part of the screenshot).

Again, there’s strong talk throughout from NOTE’s management:

NOTE’s sales in the first quarter made brisk progress. Despite persistent challenges due to shortages on the component market, we achieved growth of 28% and sales of SEK 1,051 million in the period. A somewhat more positive situation for materials has meant that the growth driven by extraordinary cost increases on electronic components has slowed.

Our order backlog was over 20% higher than at the corresponding point of last year. With our high order levels and current market conditions, we see good potential to continue our positive progress. We expect to achieve growth of 20% for the second quarter, and sales of at least SEK 4.2 billion for the full year 2023. We anticipate a continued increase in operating profit, and improvement of our operating margin.

Growth this time seemed to come mainly from the Swedish and Estonian markets, while the problems with UK EV charging solutions were expected to continue well into the end of the year. There was impressive growth in the Medtech, Industrial, and Communication segments, but due to those UK issues, the Greentech segment’s revenue decreased. For comparison, although Incap doesn’t report segment figures, my understanding is that the Greentech segment would likely be Incap’s largest, though defining products by segment (e.g., Greentech vs. Industrial) can be a bit like drawing lines in the water.

The market is appreciative, and today the stock is +8 percent, with YTD somewhere around +40.

https://www.note-ems.com/fi/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2023/04/Q1_2023_eng.pdf

By the way, I asked NOTE’s IR for an English annual report. They said it’s coming sometime this spring. The Swedish one is already available, if you can handle the neighbor’s dialect.

I also happened to notice the following in Coeus Invest’s investor letter:

Note is likewise a strongly growing electronics contract manufacturer, but the company’s customer base is clearly more widely diversified than Incap’s. No single customer brings in more than 7% of Note’s revenue. Note’s valuation is more expensive than Incap’s, but we also see a clear opportunity for margin improvement at Note. Based on discussions with management, new business from new and existing customers brings an average margin of over 15%, while the group’s reported margin was just over 10% in 2022. Over the last five years, the company has already shown nice operating leverage, as annual revenue growth of just under 26% has led to 32% annual growth in operating profit.

According to our understanding, Note has good visibility into the business, especially for the current year but also for the next. Management is also known as a very conservative guider. Based on the Capital Markets Day held in December 2022, the company believes it will reach an annual revenue of at least 5.5 billion SEK in 2025. Through operating leverage, this would lead, according to our calculations, to an operating profit of about 660 million SEK in 2025, which would mean an EV/EBIT multiple of approximately 10x for 2025 at the current enterprise value. Historically, however, Note has performed clearly better than its guidance.

For both Note and Incap, inventory levels have also risen exceptionally high due to the component shortage. As the component shortage eases and inventory levels return to normal, we see cash being released from both companies’ balance sheets equivalent to nearly 10% of their current market value. This can be used to accelerate organic growth or for inorganic growth.

17 Likes

I spent some of my Saturday leisure time watching NOTE’s Q1 webcast, and it was once again a relaxed and confident affair. I really like the CEO and the company, particularly because the CEO doesn’t hold back when describing the company and the market or envisioning the future.

By the way, there were only 40 views on YouTube, so if you watch these webcasts for a couple of years straight, you probably belong to that single-digit group of people in the world who have followed all of NOTE’s webcasts for two years.

CEO’s Comments:

  • The industry is entering a slightly more stable phase for the first time in a while.
  • Demand is very strong, and we still have trouble sourcing some components, which resulted in some orders shifting to the next quarter.
  • One of our best quarters regardless.
  • The order book is up 20% and is growing faster than our guidance would require, but visibility will certainly decrease this year as the component situation no longer requires customers to place orders so far in advance.
  • Sweden is growing very well, UK is reasonable, Finland met our expectations, and China and Estonia are performing very strongly.
  • Greentech decreased as expected due to strong comparison periods.
  • Medtech is seeing strong growth, and I expect growth to be around 100% in Q2-Q3 as well, though Q4 will be slightly more normal due to a strong comparison period.
  • The balance and mix of different segments is our strength.
  • Our largest customer actually shrank this quarter, but because we don’t have a heavy dependency on any single customer, it isn’t reflected in our overall figures.
  • Our two largest customers from 2022 will drop out of the top five in 2023 because our other large customers are outgrowing them.
  • We continue to focus constantly on quality improvement and on-time delivery. We are strong in these areas, but we can still improve.
  • We invest in our production constantly, and this is important so that we can win new customers and retain old ones. That’s why we don’t pay dividends; instead, we invest in growth. I believe we can do so much more, and do it better.
  • ROOC (Return on Operating Capital) at 24% is good, but it’s a bit of a disappointment to me personally, and I believe we can improve this during this year and the years to come.
  • Acquisition in Bulgaria: a modern production facility, strong customer relationships, 4,000 square meters of floor space, and a very clear logic for value creation as we integrate our procurement channels into the facility. ”Big opportunities!”
  • Our 2023 guidance is SEK 4.2 billion and Q2 organic growth is 20%, which, according to our logic, is the lower limit of what we expect with the current market outlook and order book.
  • We still expect 2025 revenue to be SEK 5 billion and the EBIT margin to improve.
  • We are constantly in talks regarding a couple of acquisition opportunities; we get a lot of calls now offering production facilities because we are known to invest in growth and development. We haven’t been in this situation before, but it’s obviously good for us.
  • We are confident that organic growth will improve our profitability.

Questions and Answers:

Customer inventory situation:

  • Our largest customer is reducing their inventory, but in the big picture, our customers are increasing their orders rather than decreasing them due to excessive inventory or weak demand.

Your own inventory situation:

  • Our inventory level is too high. However, our goal is to deliver precisely on time, which means our inventory can momentarily be a bit too large. I would say our inventory is SEK 300 million too high right now. We will either reduce our inventory gradually or grow without increasing inventory further.

Implementation of procurement channels in Bulgaria:

  • Not yet precisely scheduled, but I expect it to happen during 2023.

Dividends and cash flow:

  • We have plenty of good uses for cash flow, so I don’t believe the board would change its view and distribute profits to shareholders. This is, of course, a question for the board, but this is how I see it.

Largest customers:

  • Our largest customer last year accounted for 6.5%, so if that largest customer were to shrink by, for example, 20% (cf. Incap), it wouldn’t even be noticed in our overall figures.

Margins on new business:

  • There is no difference in profitability between new and old business/capacity; the defining factor is the production mix we manufacture.
16 Likes

What does this acquisition affect?

https://www.inderes.fi/fi/tiedotteet/note-grows-uk-market-through-acquisition-dvr-ltd

1 Like

A somewhat surprising move to go shopping in the UK, as the CEO hasn’t mentioned this geographical area, at least in the M&A speculations I’ve heard. In my opinion, they have only mentioned Eastern Europe and Germany as clear target areas for research.

On the other hand, they already have a foothold in the UK, so the market is familiar in that sense, and since they have existing production in the UK, it might facilitate the integration processes. They have, however, faced some difficulties in the UK recently (apparently only with a specific EV charging solution customer), so in that regard, I wouldn’t have guessed they’d increase their commitment there.

Otherwise, the deal seems very much in line with strategy and looks like exactly the kind of target that many large and fast-growing European EMS players dream of. It has a good customer portfolio, modern production lines, growing industrial/greentech customer accounts, etc. It’s not a huge facility, but large enough to be capable of fairly independent operations. Profitability is “in line with NOTE`s” (EBIT margin ~10%), which I think is a rather impressive figure for a small family-owned production facility like this.

The price mentioned is EV/EBIT 7, which is exactly the same valuation at which Incap recently made the Pennatronics acquisition in the US. I consider the price quite reasonable—even cheap—and this partly reinforces the view that valuations have come down and are continuing to drop from their peak levels. These high-quality and profitable (family-owned) EMS companies will likely be consolidated at quite a pace in the coming years. Could the race for EMS consolidation even accelerate now, when organic growth isn’t as easily attainable as it was a couple of years ago and size can be increased through acquisitions while creating shareholder value?

7 Likes

Q2 was released last week
https://www.note-ems.com/fi/press-releases/notes-second-quarter-interim-report-2023/

Webcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKdP9mE-jKg

5 Likes

It seems there is no analyst coverage for this, or at least I can’t find any forecasts or analyses online. The company has been good in the long term, but now the share price has dropped significantly. I’ve been considering investing but would like more information. Can anyone recommend a source of information?

1 Like

Found on Placera

"NOTE

SEB lowers the target price for Note to 248 kronor (270), reiterates buy - BN (Finwire)

2023-07-14 06:10"

1 Like

According to Bloomberg, there don’t seem to be any others besides the SEB mentioned by @Fenkku. In 2022, there was also Team Coverage from Sadif Investment Analytics, but this entity apparently stopped its coverage at the turn of the year.

2 Likes