Reading and Literature (excl. Investment Literature)

What you learn in your youth, you master in your old age

The Famous Five. Mother often read those to us as bedtime stories. Reading books wasn’t an everyday occurrence, but ever since I was a baby, shared bedtime stories punctuated most evenings of my childhood. We had our own books, too, but often books were fetched from the quiet local library, where some time was also spent wandering aimlessly between the shelves. Back in the 90s, every home also had bookshelves, all of which were groaning with those same Reader’s Digest nature, knowledge, and home doctor books. Sometimes, when I was bored, I browsed through those too.

For me, reading and exploring books was already a way as a child to satisfy my endless curiosity. As a school-aged child, I hardly read novels, but if I wanted to learn jig fishing, I would cycle straight to the library to get all the non-fiction books related to the topic.

As a slightly older schoolkid, evenings rarely ended with reading anymore, but rather with cleaning a moped carburetor, planning a new weightlifting routine, or watching a mediocre American crime series.

When I was writing my high school courses, my course credits for my native language were almost left incomplete. I had attended the courses, but as coursework, I should have read painfully boring domestic folk literature as a basis for various writing assignments. Everything fell behind.

I negotiated a deal with an understanding native language teacher, thanks to which I could choose the books completely freely and write multiple different course texts about the same book. I read Tony “The Viking” Halme and The Diary of a Drunken Fool (Juoppohullun päiväkirjat). Those weren’t read in the evening either, but in the back row of high school classes while giggling. However, I managed to write the texts and wrap up the courses, and I was “more cultured” by a few read books again.

As a teen and even as a young adult, I was anything but a bookworm.

After high school, I continued on the path of minimal reading. On some backpacking trip to Asia, I might read a Jarkko Sipilä crime thriller or two, but otherwise, reading was primarily focused on entrance exams. My childhood enthusiasm for reading returned momentarily during entrance exam projects, and I occasionally found myself voluntarily and complementarily reading some books that explored the topics of the entrance exam area more deeply.

However, the final return of my enthusiasm for reading was only found towards the end of my studies, when I noticed that I was heading to various libraries several days a week to read exam books, write my master’s thesis, and look for an inspiring working environment. I went around studying in different libraries and always looked for new places in them where I sat down to do my final studies. Between working, I wandered between the shelves and read the back covers of dozens and dozens of books.

Over the past ten years or so, I have read so much that reading is definitely one of my most time-consuming and beloved hobbies. I mainly read print books borrowed from the library, although I have to order foreign books for myself. I checked that in early 2023 I have read around a dozen books, I currently have 25 books on loan, 8 on hold, 2 holds waiting for pickup, and today I also made one new acquisition suggestion to the library.

I guess I’m a bookworm and I love reading. If I had more time, I would gladly read for several hours every day, but for a person in the hustle and bustle of family life, such reading amounts are an exceptional treat usually timed for peaceful weekends.

https://twitter.com/Salkku_Mauri/status/1612747117461635075

You and reading?

I think the beginning of my story is very common among my peers. Regardless of family background, most children are read to at least sometimes. Most also visit the library fairly often. If not with their own family, then from daycare or school. And the school might even have its own library.

I think the middle part of my story is also very common among my peers. For many, the touch with reading disappears as a teenager and young adult. It is replaced by everything more interesting, faster-paced, and more exciting. Reading is not fashionable, and in fact, it seems to be quite a chronically uncool hobby among youth. And I think that for the generation younger than me, reading physical books, for example, is becoming increasingly difficult all the time. Attention spans are eroding and long-term activity becomes impossible. They just can’t.

What happens to the reading hobby, attention span, and general knowledge?

https://twitter.com/Salkku_Mauri/status/1625111872650215430

I got the idea for this thread when I decided to publish all the books I read between January and March 2023 on Twitter. The purpose of that Twitter thread was perhaps primarily to stealth-market the reading hobby and the wonderful literature available, but perhaps also to spur myself on to keep my reading hobby active, although I haven’t had any problems with its activity lately.

Personally, I am worried about people’s—and sorry young men, especially yours—reading skills, attention span, and general knowledge. Of course, I am often worried about my own reading skills, attention span, and general knowledge as well, even if I might not pass for a young man anymore. Reading is one of the best medicines I know for the decline of all the aforementioned traits.

In the book Stolen Focus (by Johann Hari), if I remember correctly, it was described that 54 percent of American men had not read a single book during the previous 12 months. In my opinion, the figure is terrifying.

This gave me the idea to ask what the situation might be on the Inderes forum. It doesn’t give anyone the right to pat themselves on the back, but the situation is not quite as catastrophic as across the pond:

**What is reading?**I have drifted into a sort of personal literary elitism myself, and I think a printed book is the most beautiful form of reading. If I were rich and libraries didn’t exist, I would build my own library.

I have certainly surrendered to a few audiobooks as well, and I don’t have anything against them per se, but I recall that research also says the memory trace of a printed book is the most effective and its impact on concentration is the most permanent. A bit like how taking notes with a pen leaves a more permanent memory trace and deeper understanding than hammering away at a keyboard.

An audiobook combined with a simple physical activity is certainly effective, but I suspect quite a few people listen to audiobooks because it so smoothly enables all kinds of simultaneous multitasking. In my opinion, this is an abuse of the audiobook’s potential and will eventually lead to negative rather than positive effects in terms of concentration. I could be wrong once again.

Personally, I listen to podcasts at 1x speed, and with audiobooks I might speed up to 1.25x because the narrators are so sleepy. Often, though, I just go for a jog listening to birdsong. Boredom, silence, and just being are underrated things.

Some time ago, a productivity book was published that talked about listening to audiobooks at double or even triple speed. At the same time, you’d be doing lunges and brushing your teeth. I can’t think of a single reason why anyone would do this. It sounds like an assault on both physical and mental health.

Besides, studies have shown that even professional “speed readers” give up a handicap in reading comprehension. Fast reading, poor reading comprehension. Calm reading, deep reading comprehension. Isn’t this just logical?

I have never read a single e-book because I don’t want to stare at screens any more than I already do. But if e-books suit you, that is only a wonderful thing.

What do we read?

Earlier this winter, I made some interesting observations about print, audio, and e-books sold in Finland. First of all, print books are sold very little these days, and the trend is sharply downward. Audiobooks, on the other hand, seem to be doing better, but the contents being consumed are “lighter.” My personal conclusion is that heavy books and actual reading are decreasing, but entertainment and listening are increasing.

People simply don’t seem to have the energy to read, or even more scarily, the ability to read. In my opinion, this trend is not very good, but opinions on this can certainly vary.

Here are some highlights from the statistics:

Although I’m not a huge fan of audiobooks, I am indeed glad that children and youth seem to be listening to audiobooks this much. I don’t know if this means they replace print books, or if audiobooks are listened to in addition to print books. I fear the worst, but hope for the best.

Adult audio format “non-fiction” is almost exclusively true crime and “celebrity worship.” This wasn’t a surprise once you’re familiar with the limited selection of domestic audiobooks, but it still makes you think a bit.

All statistics:

A Guide to Reviving Reading and Literacy

Before this turns into outright bitter pessimism, let’s look at some tools to revive the reading hobby or tips to increase reading. Reading is a habit or hobby just like any other, and it responds to practice.

May I sneak in a book recommendation? There are top-tier books on habits: James Clear’s Atomic Habits and Charles Duhigg’s The Power of Habit.

I can reveal a secret. People who seem disciplined are actually no more disciplined than anyone else. They just happen to have better habits. Discipline only gives you momentum for a short while, but habits can change your whole life. In other words, if you don’t want to eat junk food every day, maybe it’s time to get rid of the snack cabinet.

The following habits could work for reading, for example:

1. Read (primarily) books that interest you

No one has the energy to read books that don’t interest them. At least initially, borrow only and exclusively books that interest you and draw you in. You can sprinkle in some “useful” books or books you want to show off on social media later, but that time will come later.

2. Keep books always within arm’s reach

Humans are lazy and do what is easy. If a book is at the store or the library, you won’t end up reading it. If the book is on a bookshelf or in a closet, you won’t read it then either. But when you have a couple on the nightstand, a couple on the coffee table, and maybe even one under your pillow, you’ll surely read at least the back cover at some point just out of spite.

3. Keep alternative distractions out of reach (i.e., live in a different room than the internet)

What do you do when you have nothing to do and feel bored? Most people probably fiddle with their phone. What if you learned to live in a different room than your phone? You could also live in a different room than your computer or remote control. If you live in a studio apartment, pull the plugs from the wall, turn off your phone, and put the SIM card in the bathroom mirrored cabinet. Then go to the park to read. Extreme concentration difficulties call for extreme measures. In the screenshot below, one time-saving target.

4. Read multiple books simultaneously

Your mood and feelings change countless times during the day. Keep different books within arm’s reach and pick up the one that feels most interesting at any given moment. For difficult moments, something light and inspiring; for alert moments, something demanding and complex; for bored moments, something refreshing and stimulating.

5. Seek inspiration from libraries, book statistics, or book brochures

Nothing catching your interest? Can’t think of anything to read? Browse publishers’ websites and new release catalogs, visit different libraries, read book statistics and brochures, lose yourself in a library search engine, or browse through Amazon and secondhand bookstores.

6. Pleasure first, utility second

Reading is mostly supposed to be enjoyable. Of course, you can optimize the benefits of reading too, but often optimization and the pursuit of utility kill the interest in almost any activity. It may be that reading about repairing an accordion isn’t useful in your life, but if you enjoy reading it, that is already more than enough. Occasionally, of course, you can also read specifically because you want to learn something useful that might not interest you all that much, but in that case, it’s worth noting that it’s perhaps more like studying than reading.

7. Practice makes master

A person becomes good at what they do. Whether it’s sipping an evening beer, making investment memes, mental arithmetic, or reading a book. Practice the things you want to be good at.

Bonus tip:

If you’re not interested in reading yourself, you can still encourage others.

I came across a study some time ago showing that fathers’ reading, in particular, has a significant impact on the development of boys’ reading skills. In addition to reading to children (your own or others’), also pretend to read in front of them.

Yes, I’m serious.

If you don’t have the energy to read yourself, just boldly lie down on the living room sofa in front of the kids and pretend to read. About 3*60 minutes per week for, say, eight years, and who knows, maybe your offspring’s enthusiasm and skill for reading will eventually rise higher than it would have without your example. You can reinforce the practice by giving books as gifts and taking day trips to the library.

In my next posts, I’ll continue with, say, fact and fiction or whatever, but before that: talk about reading.

All kinds of discussion about reading and literature are welcome. Book tips, discussion about reading, book reviews, reading habits, favorite authors, forum members’ own writing hobbies, research on reading, and so on. Remember, however, that there is a separate thread for investment books.

89 Likes

A very important topic, thank you Mauri for starting this thread!

I hope many forum members will be prompted by this introduction to consider whether they could return to a long-forgotten reading hobby, or if they never had that hobby, perhaps try reading something for the first time?

I can’t think of a hobby that offers as many benefits to investing as reading does. Just the fact that if you have the patience and focus to sit through a thick novel, it helps when wading through annual reports and interim reports. I must say that, in my opinion, investing is such a multidisciplinary field that almost any kind of literature can provide food for thought for that hobby as well. Non-fiction above all, with biographies worth mentioning as a subcategory. This was so well said that I had to take a screenshot when I came across it:

I’m in the fortunate position that I’ve been reading practically my whole life. I have the examples set in my childhood home to thank for that. Read books to your children, give books as gifts to the children of people you know!

Second-hand bookstores, flea markets, and recycling centers are great places to make affordable book finds. Personally, I rarely buy fiction new, but luckily we have libraries! However, I have bought plenty of books on investing or related topics for my shelf over the past few years, and I can warmly recommend this. It’s so convenient to pick up a book and browse through it, review the main points, find that note made in the margin, that great underlined passage, etc. You can’t do that with library books. Good books can be great investments; even those on a budget can’t afford to miss out. :slight_smile:

13 Likes

Thank you for the great thread opening. I thought I’d address the themes you raised from my perspective in return. Perhaps a slightly different angle on these fine reflections.

Me and reading
In the end, everyone seems to have a slightly different path to reading. I grew up in a family where people read a lot, and I have always enjoyed wandering through quiet libraries. But for some reason, after I learned to read myself, I didn’t really get excited about books. So for me, as a youth, reading was limited almost exclusively to comics. I did read quite a lot of them, but it also involved reading the same Lucky Lukes, Tintins, Donald Ducks (Aku Ankka), etc., over and over again. So the development of the joy of discovering new things to read remained, shall we say, a bit incomplete.
Alongside high school, however, I started reading books on physical phenomena related to my hobbies out of my own interest, and I also read some more philosophical books. Around that time, I also read some biographies related to the economy and the financial world. I still consumed comics then, although there was some kind of “growing up” on that front too (Sokal, Pratt, Manara, etc.). This roughly same line continued alongside my DI (Master of Science in Technology) studies, and of course, I read a fair amount of professional literature (articles and some books). I also started consuming crime novels and other lighter literature (the Juoppohullu books have been read). So, for me, reading increased at the point where for many it decreased!
I only came to actual literary classics clearly as an adult, although Pirsig’s Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance (definitely a work worth reading for those interested in philosophy) might have been read during my studies - though that was probably my own self-directed introduction to philosophy. So at that point, reading was pretty much non-fiction, crime novels, or comics.
Actual classic fiction only started finding its way to me as I approached forty. From individual works, I’d highlight Orhan Pamuk’s The Museum of Innocence as the one that kicked off a real bookworm phase. Only after this have I read Waltari and other true classics.
Nowadays, I read and look for reading ideas on a very broad scale, but especially in recent years, I’ve waded through investment literature quite a lot.

Reading, concentration, and general education
I share this concern completely and notice that web browsing has affected my ability to concentrate. At times, I’ve consumed YouTube videos way too much, especially when it was essentially just passing time. But there are indeed many good articles online, and you can find a lot of help for self-development and education there. But, yeah, it has its own challenges for concentration.

Reading and digital aids
I haven’t used audiobooks since childhood (back then there were a few radio plays on LP records, so the format isn’t entirely alien). I have to mention as a side note that many books can be quite excellent as radio plays; from the ancient 80s, Yle’s Radioteatteri production of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy comes to mind (I only read the book decades later). I don’t really fully understand the current audiobook craze, although I can imagine it being a functional format in some situations (car, airplane, etc.).
I’ve read e-books to some extent, and with a good e-reader, it’s quite a decent format. Especially on longer trips, taking a sufficient book collection along can be a challenge due to weight.
Admittedly, combining an audiobook with other activities is risky in many ways.

Thoughts on developing reading
There isn’t much to add to those tips listed by @Mauri. Perhaps the only thing I’d add is to find a way to read that suits you. I have some traits of a tunnel-visioned engineer, and one is perhaps that once a book is opened, it is generally read to the end whether I like it or not (that might be a slightly exaggerated description). And usually, I only have one book in progress at a time (though sometimes it is indeed good to read something else). So find your own style.

To return to the actual topic of this forum, i.e., investing, and perhaps as a small incentive to read something other than investment literature, here are a few thoughts. In my opinion, economics and investing in general are about understanding human needs, and this can be developed by reading non-fiction broadly and also by reading fiction. In his work Capital, Thomas Piketty refers a lot to the works of both Honoré de Balzac and Jane Austen when explaining the economic development of the 19th century and why it matters today. Another thought relates to understanding one’s own actions and developing one’s own investment psychology; by reading books, one can learn to understand their own behavior better and thus develop into a better investor. Hah, @Crazy_Train had already brought up this same aspect in a great way. I fully agree with that; the only thing that bothers me is that it still took far too many years to realize many things.

Thank you once again for this thread already at this stage! I look forward to new discoveries in literature through this thread.

14 Likes

Personally, I read about 20+ physical books and probably listen to 50+ books a year. Most of the books are related to investing in some way, or other topics that interest me like human history and physiology. I read very little fiction; I’ve read Harry Potter, but otherwise, I haven’t read much.

The image shows some of the books I’ve listened to, and I’ve picked out some meaningful ones that I can warmly recommend. Especially the following books were great to listen to.

Humankind: A Hopeful History. In the midst of crises and scammy markets, it was nice to listen to a positive perspective on how humans are fundamentally good.

Finnish Forest Bathing. It talks about the health benefits of the forest. Spend a lot of time in the forest, especially if you have small children.

The Silk Roads: A New History of the World (not in the picture). Quite long but very interesting. How trade has been conducted and who has been in power from the year 0 to the present day.

Edit: And if children’s books are included, then thousands of books get read during the year :sweat_smile:

10 Likes

So many good books mentioned! I’m quite a slow reader and time is limited, so I try to choose the books I read carefully. This isn’t exactly easy. I read books in Finnish. When I was younger, I waded through classics of fiction. Nowadays, I try to read based on awards—e.g., the Finlandia and Tieto-Finlandia, Travel Book of the Year, and the Nobel Prize. Newer finance books too.

Of course, everyone should read what interests them and in their own way. I think it’s fun to look for books on various lists, for example:
The 100 best books of all time – Wikipedia

8 Likes

Reading books is definitely one of the best things I can imagine. We have a toddler under a year old, which is why I’ve been reading less lately, but I still manage to read one book every week. I read considerably more fiction than anything else, for whatever reason. Audiobooks occasionally, mainly when there are offers like a month of listening for one euro or similar deals. The following books have resonated with me the most over the past year.

Ben Macintyre, The Spy and the Traitor.

An incredible true story of the life of the Russian Oleg Gordievsky. Gordievsky was a KGB agent who betrayed his country and passed information to the West for decades. I recommend listening to it as an audiobook. Jukka Pitkänen is the narrator, and his voice is perfect for the story. You can’t stop halfway. I listened to it twice until I read the physical book, and I still enjoyed every moment.

Antti Heikkinen, Einari.

A biography of the founder of Ponsse. Entertaining and immersive. An experience as an audiobook. Heikkinen himself is the narrator and speaks the Savonian dialect (savvoo) beautifully.

Markku Henriksson, Tähtilipun maa (The Land of the Star-Spangled Banner).

Henriksson has studied the United States his entire life and has condensed the history of the States from its beginning to the present day into one book. Nearly 900 pages, but such an engaging tome that there is no fear of getting bored.

John Simon, Koneen ruhtinas (The Prince of Kone) - The Life of Pekka Herlin.

A biography of the mythical and legendary Pekka Herlin. A book about an era that will never return, for better or worse. In its time, the book caused a stir with its revelations, and Niklas Herlin, in particular, gave a full broadside regarding his father.

14 Likes

I have a very typically Finnish story when it comes to reading. I learned to read with Donald Duck. After the school day, we would gather in our parents’ bedroom, and mom would read us the issue of Donald Duck that had dropped through the letterbox that day. Back then, it was rare to learn to read before starting school. That’s why I was secretly jealous of my little sister, who learned to read before going to school. People considered her a genius.

It’s curious how so many people today learn to read before starting school, yet don’t necessarily get enthusiastic about reading.

I was, and still am, a slow reader. I remember how laborious it was to finish the first The Secret Series books. Even then, though, I loved mysteries and clever animal characters, so I just had to finish those books. In second grade, it was common among girls to get pen pals through teen magazines or Teletext channels. I had plenty of them. I also kept a diary throughout my entire childhood. It’s been fun reading those entries afterwards.

Moving into third grade, the small modular annex was left behind, and the large comprehensive school had a library. The school commute was over 2 km, and especially on cold days, my friends and I would stay at the library playing board games before heading home on foot. The library also got a computer, and because using the internet at home was pretty pricey, my friends and I would often book an hour and giggle at people in the Kiss chat room.

I’d often pick up a crime novel from the library. The Usborne Book of Spooks (Noidan käsikirja), the Bert Diaries, or the Hullu Luokka books—I read them all. In middle school, reading long fantasy series was even a bit trendy. At least in our nerd class. Another big factor was that my parents borrowed a lot of comics and books from the library for us to read at home. They were simply within arm’s reach all the time. We also read magazines and newspapers, and I wanted to become as skilled at crosswords as my father. For me, writing has truly become the most natural and secure way to express myself.

At my place, at least, we no longer have the kind of book mountains we had growing up. We do have plenty of books, but there’s no cluttered bookshelf in the living room; instead, they’re neatly hidden behind closed doors in a filing cabinet by my workstation. :sweat_smile:

What has definitely changed since my childhood and my parents’ childhood is that kids no longer have writing- and reading-based hobbies in the same way. The decline of print paper inevitably brings consequences.

For me, reading has always come in waves.

Reading is a completely different experience compared to audiobooks. Personally, I don’t think books and audiobooks are mutually exclusive. Books are always much more deliberately crafted wholes than, say, podcasts. Some books are much more enjoyable to listen to as audiobooks; others must be read. I once talked with an author who said that if the goal is to write an audiobook, the writing style is different. Non-fiction intended for audiobooks needs to have a more narrative style.

With audiobooks, someone reads to you, but when reading yourself, you listen to your own voice. Personally, I’ve been swept away by audiobooks, but when it comes to fiction, I will always read it the traditional way. Reading just demands that everyone else is asleep and it’s completely quiet. I’ve had a longer break from fiction now. You can see it immediately in how you write. Commas, periods, and coherent sentence structures aren’t honed by listening or scrolling social media. But last autumn I did read A Weapon for Killing a Bull (Häräntappoase) and The Handmaid’s Tale as e-books. :sweat_smile:

Every step counts.

Books have this interesting quality where the reading experience depends heavily on how well the book fits your current state of life or mind.

Sometime in my twenties, I came across lists like this, which I still revisit from time to time. They offer great reading inspiration, but they also give a slight indication of what works are still missing from one’s general education. Some books on the BBC list are actually quite hard to track down at times.

I really ought to write down my own bucket list, but if I did, one of the items would be to READ all these books. Audiobooks and movies don’t count. E-books hold equal weight.

Bold = have read, and Italics = started, but left unfinished for some reason. From some, I’ve read excerpts.

Keskisuomalainen’s 100 Books You Must Read Before You Die:

1. Mika Waltari - The Egyptian

2. J.R.R. Tolkien - The Lord of the Rings

3. Väinö Linna - The Unknown Soldier

4. Aleksis Kivi - Seven Brothers

5. Väinö Linna - Under the North Star 1–3

6. Agatha Christie - And Then There Were None

7. Fyodor Dostoevsky - Crime and Punishment

8. Anne Frank - The Diary of a Young Girl

  1. Douglas Adams - The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy

10. Astrid Lindgren - The Brothers Lionheart

11. Antoine de Saint-Exupéry - The Little Prince

12. J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter series

13. Gabriel García Márquez - One Hundred Years of Solitude

  1. George Orwell - 1984

  2. Veikko Huovinen - The Havukka-aho Thinker

16. Elias Lönnrot - The Kalevala

17. Jane Austen - Pride and Prejudice

18. Sofi Oksanen - Purge

19. Astrid Lindgren - Pippi Longstocking

  1. Mikhail Bulgakov - The Master and Margarita

21. Richard Bach - Jonathan Livingston Seagull

  1. Umberto Eco - The Name of the Rose

23. Tove Jansson - Comet in Moominland

24. J. & W. Grimm - Grimms’ Fairy Tales I–III

25. Dan Brown - The Da Vinci Code

26. Enid Blyton - The Famous Five series

27. Anna-Leena Härkönen - Häräntappoase

  1. Ernest Hemingway - The Old Man and the Sea

29. Goscinny & Uderzo - Asterix series

  1. John Irving - The World According to Garp

31. Louisa May Alcott - Little Women

  1. Victor Hugo - Les Misérables

  2. C.S. Lewis - The Chronicles of Narnia

34. A.A. Milne - Winnie-the-Pooh

  1. Henri Charrière - Papillon

36. Alexandre Dumas - The Three Musketeers

37. Emily Brontë - Wuthering Heights

38. William Golding - Lord of the Flies

39. Juhani Aho - The Railway

  1. Leo Tolstoy - Anna Karenina

  2. Frank McCourt - Angela’s Ashes

  3. Arthur C. Clarke - 2001: A Space Odyssey

43. J.D. Salinger - The Catcher in the Rye

44. Charlotte Brontë - Jane Eyre

  1. Kurt Vonnegut - Slaughterhouse-Five

  2. Isaac Asimov - Foundation

  3. Aapeli - Pikku Pietarin piha

  4. Leo Tolstoy - War and Peace

49. Mauri Kunnas - The Doghill Farm

50. Margaret Mitchell - Gone with the Wind

  1. Nikolai Gogol - Dead Souls

  2. Albert Camus - The Stranger

53. Kirsi Kunnas - The Apple Thief (Tiitiäisen satupuu)

54. Hergé - The Adventures of Tintin series

  1. Miguel de Cervantes - Don Quixote

56. Eduard Uspensky - Uncle Fedya, His Dog, and His Cat

  1. Mark Twain - Adventures of Huckleberry Finn

  2. Johanna Sinisalo - Not Before Sundown (Troll: A Love Story)

  3. Hermann Hesse - The Glass Bead Game

  4. Günter Grass - The Tin Drum

  5. Jostein Gaarder - Sophie’s World

  6. Leon Uris - Exodus

  7. L.M. Montgomery - Emily of New Moon

  8. Ilmari Kianto - The Red Line

65. Franz Kafka - The Trial

  1. Giovanni Guareschi - The Little World of Don Camillo

67. Lewis Carroll - Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland

  1. John Steinbeck - East of Eden

  2. Kari Hotakainen - The Trench Road

  3. Paulo Coelho - By the River Piedra I Sat Down and Wept

71. Jules Verne - Around the World in Eighty Days

  1. Risto Isomäki - The Sands of Sarasvati

  2. Jaroslav Hašek - The Good Soldier Švejk

74. Giovanni Boccaccio - The Decameron

  1. Oscar Wilde - The Picture of Dorian Gray

  2. Milan Kundera - The Unbearable Lightness of Being

77. Homer - The Odyssey

  1. Peter Høeg - Smilla’s Sense of Snow

  2. Arthur Conan Doyle - The Hound of the Baskervilles

80. William Shakespeare - Hamlet

  1. Eino Leino - Whitsongs series

82. Stieg Larsson - The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo

83. Yrjö Kokko - Pessi and Illusia

84. Thomas Harris - The Silence of the Lambs

  1. Raymond Chandler - The Big Sleep

  2. Jean M. Auel - The Clan of the Cave Bear

87. Deborah Spungen - And I Don’t Want to Live This Life (Nancy)

  1. Stephen King - The Shining

  2. Laura Ingalls Wilder - Little House on the Prairie

  3. Laila Hietamies - Hylätyt talot, autiot pihat

  4. Aino Suhola - Rakasta minut vahvaksi

  5. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn - The Gulag Archipelago

93. Mikael Niemi - Popular Music from Vittula

  1. Timo K. Mukka - The Earth Is a Sinful Song

95. Juha Vuorinen - The Diary of a Drunk

96. Kjell Westö - Where Once We Walked

  1. Veijo Meri - The Manila Rope

  2. Maria Jotuni - Huojuva talo

  3. Juha Itkonen - Anna minun rakastaa enemmän

  4. Jan Guillou - Evil

BBC reckons most people have only read 6 of the following 100 books.

Put an X after the books you have read.

1 Pride and Prejudice - Jane Austen

2 The Lord of the Rings - JRR Tolkien

3 Jane Eyre - Charlotte Bronte

4 Harry Potter series - JK Rowling

5 To Kill a Mockingbird - Harper Lee

6 The Bible

7 Wuthering Heights - Emily Bronte

  1. Nineteen Eighty Four - George Orwell

  2. His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman (Universumin tomu, Golden Compass)

10 Great Expectations - Charles Dickens (Loistava tulevaisuus)

11 Little Women - Louisa M Alcott

12 Tess of the D’Urbervilles - Thomas Hardy (Tessin tarina)

  1. Catch 22 - Joseph Heller (Me sotasankarit s.543)

  2. Complete Works of Shakespeare

  3. Rebecca - Daphne Du Maurier

  4. The Hobbit - JRR Tolkien

  5. Birdsong - Sebastian Faulks (Mustarastas laulaa)

18 Catcher in the Rye - JD Salinger

19 The Time Traveller’s Wife - Audrey Niffenegger (Aikamatkustajan vaimo)

  1. Middlemarch - George Eliot (Saman niminen)

21 Gone With The Wind - Margaret Mitchell

22 The Great Gatsby - F Scott Fitzgerald

  1. Bleak House - Charles Dickens (Kolea talo)

  2. War and Peace - Leo Tolstoy

  3. The Hitch Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy - Douglas Adams

  4. Brideshead Revisited - Evelyn Waugh (Mennyt maailma: kapteeni Charles Ryderin hengelliset ja maalliset muistelmat)

27 Crime and Punishment - Fyodor Dostoyevsky

  1. Grapes of Wrath - John Steinbeck (Vihan hedelmät)

29 Alice in Wonderland - Lewis Carroll

  1. The Wind in the Willows - Kenneth Grahame (Kaislikossa suhisee)

  2. Anna Karenina - Leo Tolstoy

32 David Copperfield - Charles Dickens

33 Chronicles of Narnia - CS Lewis

34 Emma - Jane Austen

35 Persuasion - Jane Austen

36 The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe - CS Lewis

37 The Kite Runner - Khaled Hosseini (Leijapoika)

  1. Captain Corelli’s Mandolin - Louis De Bernieres

  2. Memoirs of a Geisha - Arthur Golden

40 Winnie the Pooh - AA Milne

41 Animal Farm - George Orwell

42 The Da Vinci Code - Dan Brown

  1. One Hundred Years of Solitude - Gabriel Garcia Marquez (Sadan vuoden yksinäisyys)

  2. A Prayer for Owen Meaney - John Irving (Ystäväni Owen Meany)

  3. The Woman in White - Wilkie Collins (Valkopukuinen nainen)

46 Anne of Green Gables - LM Montgomery

  1. Far From The Madding Crowd - Thomas Hardy (Ei suomennettu)

48 The Handmaid’s Tale - Margaret Atwood (Orjattaresi)

49 Lord of the Flies - William Golding

  1. Atonement - Ian McEwan (Sovitus)

  2. Life of Pi - Yann Martel (Piin elämä)

  3. Dune - Frank Herbert (Dyyni, Scifi)

  4. Cold Comfort Farm - Stella Gibbons

54 Sense and Sensibility - Jane Austen

  1. A Suitable Boy - Vikram Seth (Sopiva nuori mies)

  2. The Shadow of the Wind - Carlos Ruiz Zafon (Tuulen varjo)

  3. A Tale Of Two Cities - Charles Dickens (Kaksi kaupunkia)

  4. Brave New World - Aldous Huxley (Uljas uusi maailma)

  5. The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time - Mark Haddon (Yöllisen koiran merkillinen tapaus)

60 Love In The Time Of Cholera - Gabriel Garcia Marquez (Rakkautta koleran aikaan)

  1. Of Mice and Men - John Steinbeck (Hiiriä ja miehiä)

62 Lolita - Vladimir Nabokov

63 The Secret History - Donna Tartt

  1. The Lovely Bones - Alice Sebold (Oma taivas)

65 Count of Monte Cristo - Alexandre Dumas

  1. On The Road - Jack Kerouac (Matkalla)

  2. Jude the Obscure - Thomas Hardy (ei suomennettu)

  3. Bridget Jones’s Diary - Helen Fielding

  4. Midnight’s Children - Salman Rushdie (Keskiyön lapset)

  5. Moby Dick - Herman Melville

71 Oliver Twist - Charles Dickens

72 Dracula - Bram Stoker

73 The Secret Garden - Frances Hodgson Burnett

  1. Notes From A Small Island - Bill Bryson (Muistiinmerkintöjä pieneltä saarelta)

  2. Ulysses - James Joyce (Odusseus)

  3. The Bell Jar - Sylvia Plath (Lasikellon alla)

  4. Swallows and Amazons - Arthur Ransome (Pääskyt ja amatsonit)

  5. Germinal - Emile Zola (Kivihiilen kaivajat)

  6. Vanity Fair - William Makepeace Thackeray (Turhuuden turuilla)

  7. Possession - AS Byatt (Riivaus: Romanttinen kertomus)

81. A Christmas Carol - Charles Dickens

  1. Cloud Atlas - David Mitchell (Pilvikartasto)

  2. The Color Purple - Alice Walker (Häivähdys purppuraa)

  3. The Remains of the Day - Kazuo Ishiguro (Pitkän päivän ilta)

85 Madame Bovary - Gustave Flaubert

  1. A Fine Balance - Rohinton Mistry

  2. Charlotte’s Web - EB White (Lotta ystäväni)

  3. The Five People You Meet In Heaven - Mitch Albom

89 Adventures of Sherlock Holmes

  1. The Faraway Tree Collection - Enid Blyton

91 Heart of Darkness - Joseph Conrad

92 The Little Prince - Antoine De Saint-Exupery

  1. The Wasp Factory - Iain Banks (Ampiaistehdas)

  2. Watership Down - Richard Adams (Ruohometsän kansa)

  3. A Confederacy of Dunces - John Kennedy Toole (Typerysten salaliitto)

  4. A Town Like Alice - Nevil Shute (Viisi mustaa kanaa)

97 The Three Musketeers - Alexandre Dumas

98 Hamlet - William Shakespeare

99 Charlie and the Chocolate Factory - Roald Dahl

  1. Les Miserables - Victor Hugo (Kurjat)
20 Likes

I’ve been thinking more about these new ways of consuming literature. And the points raised by @Aili about the different experiences and the suitability of different book styles for audiobooks are actually very much in line with what I was pondering.

While thinking about these, I remembered that this faster consumption of books achieved through technology might not be a new phenomenon? Back in comprehensive school, we were assigned to read The Unknown Soldier (Tuntematon sotilas), and many friends decided to solve the problem by watching both then-existing film versions. In movies based on books, however, the loyalty to the original work varies quite a bit.

I also started to think that Reader’s Digest (Valitut Palat) has had condensed novels from the very beginning, which likely made ‘real’ literature lovers scoff. There have surely been other ways of addressing this same problem over the years (not enough time). Probably throughout history, there have been different ways to engage with books, and surely someone scoffed when book printing started because books were no longer handwritten and decorated.

One issue that has emerged, which audiobooks address, is the lack of time and/or a suitable opportunity. But I also recalled a conversation with a friend about why he chooses a movie over a book (in cases where both are available). My friend mentioned that when reading a book, he cannot immerse himself enough to visualize the events, whereas when watching movies, things are presented in a finished form. One could think of it as a lack of imagination? Perhaps a more constructive way is to think that some of us have a significantly more audio-visual way of perceiving things and phenomena? Perhaps in that case, audiobooks could be helpful?

So maybe in the end, I would distinguish between how books are consumed (print, e-, or audio) and, on the other hand, this excessive urge to multitask. And I completely agree with @Mauri that calm reading enables thinking and thus better internalization of the content. It seems to be a very multifaceted issue.

6 Likes

That “100 books you must read before you die” list is actually quite interesting. I’m 25 and I’ve read, listened to, or been read maybe 50–60 of those books. I would say that quite a few books are missing from that list.

6 Likes

I have started to worry about the “level” of the literature I read and how little I read. Over the last couple of years, I have mainly read King and other horror authors along with various adventurous crime novels. I have started perhaps thirty books, all of which I have left unfinished. Previously, I used to read about 40–50 books a year. Now, over the last couple of years, I have managed to finish maybe twenty, if even that, and I remember almost nothing from most of them. It feels like I only manage to finish those horror books and crime pulp.

This worries me. There haven’t really been any changes in my life situation. It is as if I just can’t find anything interesting new to read. As if Finnish literature in particular is stuck in a rut, being a flat, monotonous depiction of boring middle-class life, everyday crises, and relationship problems (even though it surely isn’t, I just think that way). I think Miki Liukkonen tried to start something new in Finnish literature, but unfortunately, I left his last book, Elämä: esipuhe (Life: A Preface), unfinished. To me, it was just words in a row that I didn’t understand. Liukkonen’s O was fascinating, but I wonder how it would go if I read it today. I have also left unfinished a couple of Harry Salmenniemi’s latest short story collections, even though I am 100% sure that I actually like them. Worrying. Although, in my own opinion, I have regressed in general, even though I’m not even 40 yet. Somehow this reading problem is probably related to the brain or brain chemistry.

But at least a few works have left a mark recently, which I can warmly recommend to others as well. If for no other reason, then for the sake of general education and general understanding.

  • Colson Whitehead, The Nickel Boys. A chilling work. Perhaps the most harrowing thing I’ve read in a while.
  • Maja Lunde, the climate trilogy: The History of Bees, Blue, and The Last. Great themes; it will likely make even the most hardened human being think about the future and what kind of world our children and grandchildren might have if something isn’t done.
  • The Life and Death of George Floyd. In the “everyone should read this” category. Especially certain types of people. Goes well together with The Nickel Boys.
  • David Foster Wallace, Infinite Jest. This book highlights the possibilities of literature. It also serves as a good means to overcome substance abuse problems and/or addictions. I am not a person who laughs easily, but oh boy, how I laughed while reading this. The book also contains what is probably the most distressing way to die imaginable. Despite its reputation, it is easy to read, if you don’t count its massive physical size.
  • Pirita Näkkäläjärvi, Vastatuuleen (Against the Wind). I read somewhere that this is good first aid for the majority population’s knowledge deficit.
15 Likes

I think different ways of consuming literature are suited for different situations. I listen to a lot of books myself; based on my BookBeat history, I’ve listened to a little over 500 books covering a wide range. However, I also like to read things other than interim reports. :sweat_smile: The only thing I haven’t really warmed up to is fiction as an e-book. Fiction should be either an audiobook or a physical book.

7 Likes

Great thread! I almost feel obligated to comment here for professional reasons (as a primary school teacher), so here goes. I’ll try to keep it within some limits, even though the subject interests me immensely and I absolutely love reading and books, which is why I could write about the topic from almost any angle. I also always like to emphasize how much one can benefit from reading just about anything, even if you don’t learn actual “facts” from everything. This perspective is also reflected in my story. But to the point:

Me and reading
My own story didn’t start with me learning to read before school, but I still have a very strong sense of “enlightenment” associated with learning to read. I still remember how I learned to read after the autumn break in first grade, during a single lesson. I haven’t experienced a similar epiphany in anything else since. The story goes very briefly like this: until that particular lesson, I hadn’t understood anything about the alphabet or the sounds associated with them (Why wasn’t the letter S read as “ess”, but you had to hiss “sss”?), but suddenly it clicked that the names of the letters and the sounds used for them are two different things. In that moment, I learned to read and I haven’t looked back; even the syllable hyphens could go as soon as I was no longer forced to write them everywhere (the pesky things just messed up my reading, in my opinion).

Here is a summary of my reading history: quite quickly after learning to read, I jumped from beginner books to slightly longer ones. In second grade, I read Enid Blyton’s Adventure, Secret Seven, and Famous Five series—of which, by the way, I found the Famous Five to be the most boring, even though they are generally the most well-known of the bunch. In third grade, I read almost all the Tarzan books, in fourth grade The Three Musketeers with its sequels, and in fifth grade The Count of Monte Cristo. Those books by Alexandre Dumas, père, are probably still my all-time favorites. Donald Duck was always part of my selection, and still is, occasionally returning to the classics. As a fun memory and a point of pride regarding reading, I remember when we had a reading competition in class in fifth grade where we counted the pages read. I re-read The Three Musketeers, The Surgeon’s Stories (Välskärin kertomukset), and numerous other books that I obviously no longer remember at this stage of my life. I won that competition, if I recall correctly, after reading over 43,000 pages of novels (comics weren’t counted in this competition), and the runner-up lost by about 10,000 pages—and was also a boy, by the way. There were a few of us boys in the same class who were enthusiastic about reading, which was great when thinking about it from a teacher’s perspective.

In lower secondary school, I enjoyed reading until about 8th grade, but then there were many years when I didn’t really read anything. I remember, however, how in 9th grade we had to read The Egyptian (Sinuhe), which I thought was the most boring book I had read up to that point. I’ve tried to start it again as an adult, but Waltari somehow doesn’t grab me and I always end up quitting halfway. In high school, I read very little; my only memory related to reading is when I had to give a book presentation on Robinson Crusoe without notes and I couldn’t be bothered to prepare, so I read a snippet of the book during the previous break and while I was giving my presentation. I picked examples of the narrative on the fly and I think I got a ten (highest grade) :joy: Reading was useful, though; I was still a very fast reader and was able to get good grades in subjects like history and biology with very little effort or cramming.

After high school, in the army, I started reading a bit more during evening free time after years of a break, but the pace was still quite lazy and I often fell asleep in my bunk as soon as I tried to browse a book. The lazy pace continued in my studies, where I mostly read the mandatory texts. Still, the childhood reading hobby bore fruit even in university because, for example, I didn’t really have to read the source materials for my thesis; I was so fast at skimming and finding the relevant points.

At this point, I must also mention that even though I haven’t been reading physical books, I have always read almost everything interesting I come across on the internet. It’s just a pity that on a screen, I notice my concentration wandering too much and I scroll through pages far too quickly. After moving into working life, I forced myself to pick up books again and start reading. At first, it took a while to get back the concentration that had been ruined by web browsing, but once I got it, I started enjoying reading again, and for the past few years, I haven’t let myself slip from a pace of about one book per week. As the following listing from the beginning of the year shows, I am very “omnivorous” regarding literature and I don’t really care whether it’s Donald Duck or some collected achievements of quantum physics. I think reading absolutely anything is good as long as it’s interesting, and sometimes even if it isn’t. However, I don’t force myself to read; I try to keep it as something nice that I want to do.

Nowadays I read 1–3 books a week, everything from fantasy novels to non-fiction and poetry. I especially like biographies and history at the moment. I haven’t been in the habit of keeping reading lists, but while writing this, for fun, I recalled that of the so-called classics, I’ve read To Have and Have Not (Kirjava satama) and Brave New World (Uljas uusi maailma) this year. Other books so far this year: all of The Witcher (Noituri) series, The Dawn of Everything (Ihmiskunnan uusi historia), Isomettän poika, Humphrey Carpenter’s J. R. R. Tolkien: A Biography, Hanskat tiskissä, and Maailma ilman pimeää. At the moment, I’m at the beginning of Moby Dick (Valkoinen valas), and on the shelf waiting is Light in the Dark: Black Holes, the Universe and Us (Valo pimeydessä - mustat aukot, maailmankaikkeus ja me). I haven’t felt like reading investment books this year; last year I read Harri Huru’s The Snowball Effect of Real Estate Investing (Asuntosijoittamisen lumipalloefekti) and some miscellaneous lighter ones.

Audiobooks are completely impossible for me to listen to; my mind won’t stay focused on them, and I can’t “paint” the events in my head the same way as when reading the text myself. I’ve tried to tell my students that listening to audiobooks is perfectly fine, but they must also learn to read themselves because you can’t always listen to everything. Personally, I don’t consider audiobooks to be reading at all, but I let those listen who get something out of it. For students, listening serves as a good listening comprehension exercise, and maybe they’ll even learn to appreciate literature while listening—perhaps then, someday, they’ll be inspired to read too.

All in all, literature and reading have always been a defining thing in my life. I haven’t learned as much about life (or anything else) from anything as I have from books. I remember crying many times during The Three Musketeers and its sequels. Especially D’Artagnan’s death on the last page of The Vicomte of Bragelonne (Muskettisoturien viimeiset uroteot) touched me deeply; it was so bittersweet. Also Porthos’s fate. . So, I have also gained great emotions from books; for example, I have never experienced anything comparable from movies. They don’t “live” in my thoughts and emotions in the same way.

I have always been good at immersing myself in reading, a fast reader, and good at imagining things from the text. I also remember the text well, rather than just wading through it at a terrible speed. I believe these are factors that contribute to the motivation to read, but I believe they can also be practiced through diligent reading. Still, I have sympathy for those for whom reading is, for one reason or another, more difficult.I’ve also been lucky that my mother has always been an avid reader, and through her, I’ve had a role model. My father isn’t quite the same kind of person who gets immersed in and devours books, but he has always read as well. I’ve already received one of his important childhood books from him as an “advance inheritance,” which I like very much myself (especially) even as an adult: Yordan Radichkov’s “We Sparrowlings.” I see it that, in the end, reading starts at home, and I am concerned on behalf of my profession that few people read to their children when they are small anymore, or provide a role model for reading through their own actions. In school, it’s very difficult to get the spark of enthusiasm ignited, especially when about a million dopamine-releasing apps and videos in their pockets are competing for the children’s attention. In a professional sense, it is a joy to see that there are parents like this here on the forum, as I have been reading.

That’s the story.

I wanted to comment on this separately from my own perspective:

In cases like these, I’m inclined to think that it’s not about a lack of imagination, but rather it may well be because either the mechanical reading speed is too slow, reading is otherwise laborious, the ability to concentrate is insufficient, or there are deficiencies in reading comprehension itself. With children, you can clearly see that those for whom reading is laborious and slow are also the weakest at describing what they’ve read or sharing any observations, even if they had an unlimited amount of time. The capacity simply isn’t there. When more speed is developed through practice, reading comprehension often improves as well – though not for everyone. If I recall correctly, there has also been some kind of research showing that some people don’t “see” things when reading written text in the same way as others. I can’t be bothered to start looking for the study now, and I don’t even dare promise that it isn’t something I imagined, but that’s how I remember/think about it anyway.

15 Likes

That’s exactly it!

This, of course, got me thinking.

By reading books, people aim to advance many kinds of things.

  1. First and foremost, for many, the skill learned in school is what comes to mind first. Information is sought from books. People probably have some genetic tendency created by the cultural revolution to believe in the truthfulness and absoluteness of printed and published text. Somehow we consider written text, and especially printed text, to be more reliable. Perhaps it’s because publishers maintained a high standard for a long time regarding whose texts they agreed to publish. Authors themselves have written exciting books about this. In reality, especially for the largest publishers, the purpose is specifically to sell books.

  2. As a second obvious reason, people read because they want to know what everyone is talking about. People also want to form their own opinions on matters that have sparked a lot of discussion, as reading people might have noticed yesterday with the Kiira Korpi controversy. You would think this is the same thing as searching for information, but it isn’t. There is a razor-thin, yet very significant difference in whether a person wants to search for information or form their own opinions.

Do your own research.

  1. When a book becomes a phenomenon, you want to be part of that phenomenon. FOMO. Even in investment literature, FOMO is a familiar phenomenon. You can easily get rid of that “itch” by reading.

FOMOs related to literature are very welcome.

  1. Reading develops thinking. Especially in good books, there is very often more than one level. In art-style literature, there are then layers upon layers that are studied and interpreted until the end of time.

Metalevels

Because of this, good books often withstand multiple readings, or you understand much more as you grow and develop yourself.

As an easy example, one could take the controversial book “Nancy” (And I Don’t Want to Live This Life), which at one time high school Finnish teachers could use as a lesson example because, by that age, most had already read it. “Nancy” tells the story of 1970s punk culture icons Nancy Spungen and Sex Pistols bassist Sid Vicious from the perspective of Nancy’s mother.

Has there been any talk here about the 1970s oil crisis or the problems of Western countries.

Nancy and Sid. Sid and Nancy.

England in the 1970s was shadowed by youth unemployment. Punk culture is a youth subculture born among the young people of that time, characterized by representatives who bought a guitar with their last pennies and had no clue about singing or playing skills. Heavy use of alcohol and drugs was very typical. This story is familiar.

But…

In the book “Nancy,” Nancy’s mother tells a sad story of how a 1950s doctor recommended strong painkillers even for a newborn child. Behavioral disorders only changed into others and doses were increased. Nancy went from one psychiatrist to another, who found nothing wrong with her. Eventually, Nancy moved away from home, found music first in New York, and then the epic couple found each other in London.

A real Wuthering Heights, if you know what I mean. :winking_face_with_tongue:

Nancy’s mother also meets Sid during their American tour. Nancy is found stabbed in a hotel. Nancy was pregnant when she died. It was never clarified whether Sid was innocent or guilty, but shortly after he was released from prison as innocent, he killed himself with an overdose. The story continues posthumously amidst Nancy’s mother processing her grief.

When you read the book for the first time, you read a tragic true story about a girl who didn’t really have a chance. You are horrified. You feel sympathy for the mother and are frustrated with the world. This would have been preventable if everyone else knew how to be better.

When you start to think about the story and the narrative more closely, perhaps later or on the next reading when you are a bit more mature, you stop to consider the storytelling style. Nancy’s story is written in such a way that the mother portrays herself as a very pure person who could do nothing but give medicine to her child time after time, each time stronger. Of course, at that time, the effects weren’t known. The mother describes Nancy as if Nancy was always to blame for all the family’s problems. A child who cried. A 6-year-old who had to be feared. A 10-year-old who didn’t fit in to play with other children. An 11-year-old who threatened the nanny with scissors. Quite serious sins, or was Nancy just a child after all? Everything about Nancy’s dress, her way of speaking, her way of seeking her mother’s approval was wrong. The grieving mother’s resentment toward her own child shows even posthumously, which is sad. The book actually tastes of rationalization. Unfortunately.

Realizing these different layers in texts is actually the whole “salt” of reading slowly over time. Many feel a kind of sense of superiority when they understand more from the same text than others. Readers are often their own kind of detectives.

  1. Reading expands vocabulary. Opportunities to use language to clarify thoughts.

  2. Grammar and correct sentence structures are found more naturally; in theory, it should be easier to learn where to put periods and commas. They get practiced without even noticing. Writing itself, however, only improves by writing.

  3. Books teach you to empathize, to understand others, to step into another person’s situation. Many of us immerse ourselves in books so deeply that you can almost feel like you are that person. You can feel the sadness, laugh out loud, feel the heavy armor on your shoulders, the salty sea breeze on your face, or the pain of stinging wounds safely, without moving anywhere.

I’m sure there are many other good things, but these came to mind quickly.

Often people try to take shortcuts in reading books because they are only looking for the first point—information. However, in reading books or any text, one must always remember that written text always has someone who wrote it. If we don’t count texts written by AI, the author is always a human. The Bible is said to have been received through God’s inspiration, but even then the writer has only been a human—fallible, living in their own time, in their own context, with their own dreams and motivators. What’s interesting are the books whose voices still speak to us clearly across centuries as if they were written yesterday. My own favorites for this are Jane Austen’s satires (not suitable for the average forum member).

You won’t find wisdom in books per se, but you can very well become wiser along the way.

9 Likes

I’ve actually noticed that fast readers specifically tend to lack an “inner narrator.” There is actually a certain well-liked writer and prolific reader here on the forum who has shared that they lack an inner narrator and don’t really see the events of what they read in their mind’s eye.

7 Likes

I consider myself a fast reader; the experience is partly the same, but in some ways exactly the opposite.

Specifically, I do see the things I read in my head, but I don’t hear any “internal narrator”. In a state of deep focus, the text just ceases to exist and is replaced by a kind of internal movie that has no playback speed limits. At that point, you don’t even notice whether you’re turning pages or not; the image just flows forward, and eventually you realize the book has ended (and time has vanished from the clock somewhere).

It’s interesting to note that people have such a wide variety of experiences and styles, even though it’s easy to think that everyone reads the same way. Of course, that’s not the case, as this thread already proves even at this stage.

6 Likes

Great thread, and it seems many forum members spent their childhood and youth with the same books. Donald Duck, Bert, the Potter books, and Tolkien have become familiar here too. I didn’t notice anyone mentioning Roald Dahl. Apparently, the author’s works are being “edited” quite heavily lately, but at least I personally enjoyed them greatly as a child.

A few other thoughts that occurred to me:

  1. The internal narrator was mentioned above, and for me at least, it’s so strong that it makes me immerse myself in a good book, losing track of time.

  2. This might have been mentioned already, but reading specifically helps with writing and, through that, expressing oneself and one’s feelings better. I’ve noticed that the decrease in physical books has made me, at least, check my spelling more often than before. A skilled writer is also able to maintain the reader’s interest even in factual/professional texts.

  3. Perhaps related to that first point, but for me, books also evoke stronger emotions than video. For example, the emotions experienced during plot twists, but also those related to the reading process itself.

  4. Related to point 3 regarding the role of school in reading: PE (Physical Education) has already been moved away from being a performance-based subject, and its purpose in the curriculum is to inspire children and young people to exercise. Why doesn’t reading have a similar inspiring role? Instead, I personally had to read Pikku Pietarin Piha (The Yard of Little Peter—an absolutely dreadfully boring tome, and I tried to negotiate my way out of it), Minna Canth’s short stories, and other classics. On the other hand, some teachers have allowed choosing book report topics with a veto right or from a limited selection.

  5. As a tip, it’s worth keeping a list of interesting books you come across in your phone’s notes. It’s easy to refer back to them later, for example, at the library.

PS. This isn’t strictly related to Aili’s update, but I’m annoyed by those “these X things you must do” lists if they don’t include justifications. It’s easy to put Sinuhe (The Egyptian) on the list and the audience will nod in agreement at the Finnish classic, but I personally am interested in what is exceptional about that specific work that it has earned its place on such a list.

11 Likes

I only realized long after I had read Dahl’s short stories that he is known for his children’s books. The excellent My Uncle Oswald probably isn’t suitable reading for children either :joy:

From those lists by @Aili, it caught my eye that the Finnish one had Orwell’s 1984 while the BBC equivalent had Huxley’s Brave New World. I feel that Huxley’s work has received a bit less attention in recent years, for no reason at all. Both definitely belong in the must-read category, as does Orwell’s Animal Farm (which was on that BBC list).

This is a fantastic thread, :+1: to @Mauri

Reading is always worth it!

8 Likes

Uncle Oswald would probably be abandoned as a children’s bedtime story after just the first couple of pages and swapped for another book.

Roald Dahl was a great children’s author in the sense that he insisted his books be priced in the lowest price category, as he believed the price of a children’s book shouldn’t limit the opportunity to read.

Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels in its original form likely works for both the child and the parents. It has layers that only the parents will understand. Swift presented social criticism in such a way that he couldn’t be thrown in prison for writing stories.

7 Likes

I read that Huxley back in the autumn. In it, the future is presented as a different kind of dystopia than in Orwell’s 1984. Personally, I might prefer 1984, but both are insightful.

Huxley has certainly been visible, otherwise I wouldn’t have come across it :slightly_smiling_face: (on some level I was aware of it, of course). Both are esteemed classics.

Edit: @Monopoly_of_bees good point! As I understand it, John Brunner’s Stand on Zanzibar also revolves around the same themes. I’m waiting for this to arrive at the library, so please put any analyses of it behind a spoiler tag - Like this.

3 Likes

This is exactly that FOMO related to literary discussion I was talking about. I haven’t read either yet, and the FOMO hit me enough that I know what to tackle next when the moment comes.

3 Likes