Stora Enso as an investment

Stora Enso, a forest industry company, is holding a Capital Markets Day on November 11, 2020, which is a great reason to open its own thread for the company. Stora Enso’s market value is approximately ten billion euros, making it one of the TOP10 most valuable companies on our stock exchange.

The history of the Swedish-Finnish company dates back to the 13th century on the Stora side, making it one of the world’s oldest companies. In the 21st century, the entire industry in Finland has been slowly transitioning away from paper towards renewable materials: the company even brands itself with the description “the renewable materials company.” Paper is considered a sunset industry, but forest companies have slowly caught up with future megatrends related to sustainable development and the bioeconomy.

The COVID-19 crisis has accelerated the decline of paper, and interestingly, this year, according to Antti’s forecasts, the contribution of paper to revenue is already smaller than that of packaging materials.

Stora Enso’s CMD can be found here: https://www.storaenso.com/en/investors/stora-enso-as-an-investment/capital-markets-day

A general thread for forest companies can also be found here.

17 Likes

Hello,

You can follow Stora Enso’s virtual Capital Markets Day (CMD) 2020 tomorrow, Wednesday, November 11, 2020, starting at 2:00 PM.
Link to the webcast: Stora Enso Capital Markets Day 2020

The program is as follows:

— Welcome – Ulla Paajanen, Head of Investor Relations, moderating the event
— Strategy – Annica Bresky, President and CEO
— Financial Review – Seppo Parvi, CFO
— Q&A
— Closing Remarks – Annica Bresky, President and CEO

You can ask questions during the webcast or here in this thread. We will answer questions on this forum after the event.

15 Likes

As expected, a statement on the updated strategy and new financial targets was released this morning, which can be read here.

The broad outlines of the strategy did not contain massive surprises, at least initially. Growth is sought especially from cartonboards and packaging, as well as higher value-added areas of Wood Products and Biomaterials (construction applications and lignin derivatives). Forest assets, sawmills, and pulp mills serve as the backbone for these growth businesses. The playbook for the coming years, however, seems offensive, and a growth target of over 5% (excluding Paper, previously faster than market growth) is certainly not a reduction in ambition. Excluding Forest from the ROCE-% target calculation of over 13% was also expected, as the balance sheet structure has changed significantly since the previous target was set, and with the future balance sheet structure (including a significant amount of revalued forest), the previous target had become extremely difficult.

A major pulp and board investment is also being planned in Skoghall. The investment forecast for 2021 also exceeded my own forecasts and most likely the consensus as well, which in my opinion also indicates the aggressive nature of the playbook.

There were so many new things in this morning’s announcements that interesting presentations are definitely on the way!

4 Likes

Maybe these questions will break the ice a bit. :wink:


-Key changes in the strategy update?

-Packaging products and pulp are supported by several strong growth drivers, from the growth of the Asian middle class to sustainable development. Still, in most product categories, market growth forecasts are at or below GDP growth forecasts. In your opinion, are the story and the numbers contradictory?

-In recent years, Stora Enso has invested significantly more in product development than its competitors. How do you measure the productivity of product development investments, and what results have you achieved with these investments? What results should investors expect from product development work in the future?

-At the CMD, you hinted at significant market sizes and very high margin potentials for certain new packaging products, construction components, and biochemical applications. What are these estimates based on?
What does achieving a ROCE-% of over 13% (excl. Forest) require?

-Regarding the balance sheet, Stora Enso aims for a net gearing ratio of less than 60% and a net debt/EBITDA ratio of less than 2x. The net gearing ratio is already quite clearly below the target, and the revaluation of forest assets in Q4 will likely reduce it further. On the other hand, net debt/EBITDA is above the target. What should investors think about Stora Enso’s capital allocation in the coming years? Why don’t you use more cheap debt leverage than before, when the balance sheet now has significantly more low-risk and low-return forest assets than in previous years?

2 Likes

Hi Verneri,
Thanks for your questions! Here are the answers.

Q: Key changes in the strategy update?
A: We have renewed our strategy and long-term financial targets to better support growth and value creation in our business. At the same time, we continue to create value in the bioeconomy with our renewable products that solve global sustainability challenges. We focus on meeting our customers’ demands for environmentally friendly and circular economy-based solutions, and we invest in innovation.

Stora Enso will have three growth focus areas going forward:

Packaging Materials and Packaging Solutions, driven by high demand for plastic-free and environmentally friendly, circular economy-designed packaging. We are market leaders and see attractive investment opportunities in these businesses.

Building Solutions within the Wood Products division, driven by the growing market for wooden buildings. We offer alternatives to fossil-based building materials and are a leading global supplier.

In the Biomaterials division, our innovation program focuses on lignin, and innovations are aimed at strong growth in new applications and new markets.

Q: Packaging products and pulp are supported by several strong growth drivers, from the growth of the Asian middle class to sustainable development. Still, for most product categories, market growth forecasts are at or below GDP growth forecasts. In your opinion, do the story and the numbers contradict each other?
A: According to the latest forecasts, the long-term growth prospects for the Packaging Materials division are good. The combined markets for consumer board and corrugated board raw material are estimated to grow from 2020-2030: in China +2.9%, in the rest of Asia +2.9%, and in Europe +1.7% annually. These markets are growing faster than, for example, the North American market, which is not a focus area for us. The Chinese market is significant in size – 61 million tonnes per year, while the European market is 42 million tonnes and the rest of Asia 41 million tonnes. Replacing fossil raw materials with renewable materials is a significant long-term growth driver that supports our business. In addition, the growth of e-commerce increases the need for corrugated packaging, which creates demand for our products.

Stora Enso is a market leader in consumer board in Europe and the fourth largest player globally.

Q: In recent years, Stora Enso has invested significantly more in product development than its competitors. How do you measure the productivity of product development investments, and what results have you achieved with these investments? What results should investors expect from product development work in the future?
A: Our innovations are based on the idea that everything currently made from non-renewable raw materials can be made from wood in the future. In line with the new strategy, our innovation projects will focus on new, sustainable packaging materials and barrier coatings, as well as the opportunities offered by lignin in biochemistry. In addition, our goal is to bring new products to market even faster.

We have invested more in research and development than our competitors, both absolutely and relatively. In 2019, our R&D investments were 141 million euros, or 1.4% of our net sales.

Q: At CMD, you hinted at significant market sizes and very high margin potentials for certain new packaging products, building components, and biochemical applications. What are these estimates based on? What does achieving a ROCE-% of over 13% (excl. Forest) require?
A: The estimates are based on comprehensive strategy work carried out within the company during 2020. We focus on leading positions and accelerating growth in the Packaging Materials and Packaging Solutions divisions, as well as in Building Solutions and Biomaterials innovations. Our new long-term ROCE target is >13% excluding the Forest division. The profitability levels of the three focus areas mentioned above are high, and by growing in these businesses, it is possible to achieve the Group’s operational return on capital employed (ROCE) target.

Q: Regarding the balance sheet, Stora Enso aims for a net gearing ratio of less than 60% and a net debt/EBITDA ratio of less than 2x. The net gearing ratio is already quite clearly below the target, and the Q4 revaluations of forest assets will likely reduce it further. On the other hand, the net debt/EBITDA is above the target. What should investors think about Stora Enso’s capital allocation in the coming years? Why don’t you use cheap debt leverage more than before, when the balance sheet now clearly has more low-risk and low-return forest assets than in recent years?
A: One of our key competitive advantages is our significant forest assets. They guarantee us a renewable and competitively priced fiber. Preliminary estimates, based on transactions in areas where Stora Enso has forest land, indicate that the value of the Group’s forest assets, including leased land, is 6.5–7.0 billion euros, compared to a book value of 5.4 billion euros at the end of the third quarter. Approximately 30% of the Group’s wood raw material needs are met from its own sources or through long-term supply agreements globally.

Our balance sheet is currently strong. At the end of the third quarter of 2020, our liquidity position was 2.2 billion euros, including cash, credit limits, and available financing sources. In the new strategy, the financial targets measuring indebtedness have remained unchanged. Our net debt/operational EBITDA target is <2.0x, and for net gearing, <60%. When we look at our balance sheet, we want to emphasize that we want to maintain an investment grade credit rating and be a good dividend payer.

You can view Stora Enso’s CMD 2020 presentation materials here:
Stora Enso CMD 2020 presentations

15 Likes

The news is only visible to subscribers, but it seems to be about a design error in the construction of the new board machine’s piping in Oulu. An expensive bang.

@Antti_Viljakainen Hello! From the press release below, we can directly extrapolate Stora’s Swedish forest assets to be worth 18 billion euros. What are your thoughts on this?

https://www.inderes.fi/fi/tiedotteet/stora-enso-oyj-stora-enso-myy-ydintoimintoihin-kuulumatonta-metsaomaisuutta-etela

1 Like

Hi! In my thinking, forest assets are strategic for Stora Enso, and I don’t believe the entire asset or a significant part of it is for sale (although the option exists). This somewhat dampens my enthusiasm for speculating on the market price of forest assets, as the market value or book value of forest assets is not of great significance to investors if the forest is held for eternity. In this scenario of eternal ownership, the value in forest ownership should come through, especially through the competitiveness, profitability, and stability of industrial operations, as well as the increase in cash flow generated by forest assets. Therefore, as a long-term investor, I would look especially at the return on capital generated by the entire balance sheet and the cost of capital, and on the other hand, the price tag and my own return target, when evaluating the attractiveness of the whole as an investment.

I do not deny in any way that Stora Enso’s Swedish (and also Finnish) forest assets would not be valuable at current market prices (and interest rates), but in my opinion, valuing the entire pot at 18 billion would take a couple of quite sharp shortcuts. Firstly, hectare prices in southern Sweden are something different from those in northern Sweden. In addition, hectare prices in smaller deals are often higher than in larger ones (i.e., the entire pot would be more difficult to sell at that hectare price).

2 Likes

You can find an episode of “Pörssipäivä” from December on YLE Areena with good discussion about forest companies.

Do you consider a scenario possible where forest assets are spun off into a separate company and listed, but Stora remains a significant owner? (Or a joint venture, e.g., with pension companies)

This would free up capital for the parent company, and the spin-off could focus on enhancing the productive potential of forests/land. In a TINA (There Is No Alternative) world, there might be significant demand for a stable asset.

1 Like

Yes, a spin-off would at least be somewhat possible. Indeed, there would likely be demand for it, as with a suitable capital structure (i.e., healthy leverage), a pension company, for example, could achieve a very good risk-adjusted return on equity from this type of asset, even if the invested capital, at the current earnings level, does not offer a return more than 2-3% higher than the invested capital after revaluations. Nor do faster forest growth (i.e., future earnings growth) or other measures aimed at improving returns easily raise the return on invested capital significantly, considering the asset mass in the denominator. Therefore, the use of leverage is, in my opinion, key in this type of asset, especially when cheap and long-term money is abundantly available. Leverage and the limitations of its use are also one reason why I am not particularly enthusiastic about mere revaluations in forest companies in practical life (i.e., without leverage, ROE-% and a relatively low ROCE-%). For example, Stora Enso’s debt targets have remained the same, even though a significant amount of stable, somewhat liquid, and, when compared to the group’s overall return targets, low-return assets have appeared/are appearing on the other side of the balance sheet.

Despite certain attractive elements, an unproblematic joint venture would, of course, not be without its issues, so I do not consider a spin-off a particularly likely scenario for Stora Enso, at least in the short term. Perhaps the most fundamental problem, in my opinion, would be that, in the big picture, Stora Enso, which uses more wood than it harvests from its own forests (or any other forest company), benefits from a low/decreasing market price for wood despite its own forest assets, while the interest of the other parties in a spin-off company would likely be a high/rising price for wood. This, in turn, could lead to some kind of problems in the long run. As I understand it, challenges of this type were at least partly a reason for the dissolution of Bergvik Skog (BS was a joint venture focused solely on forest ownership), which Stora Enso was also pushing for just over 1-2 years ago.

2 Likes

What’s pulling Stora Enso? Are we waiting for big news like other forest giants, or is a big ad in the ski races enough to raise the stock price?

1 Like

Hi!

Stora Enso will organize a virtual event open to everyone after the 2021 Annual General Meeting on Friday, March 19.

The virtual event will present the decisions of the Annual General Meeting, as well as an overview of the 2020 financial year and Stora Enso’s current strategy and financial targets. Presentations by Stora Enso’s Board of Directors and CEO will be followed by a Q&A session where participants can ask questions to the company’s management.

When?

Friday, March 19 from 5:00 PM - 6:15 PM

How to participate?

Regards,
Stora Enso IR team

6 Likes

https://keskustelut.inderes.fi/t/stora-enson-virtuaalitapahtuma-yhtiokokouksen-jalkeen-pe-19-3/15334?u=pohjolan_eka

2 Likes

A short video about the Sunila mill, related to the development of lignin and its potential uses, can be found on Yle Areena.

Yesterday, news from Stora Enso even made it into the 8:30 PM news broadcast, but did not cause major reactions in the stock price, … perhaps not yet. So, they are discontinuing the production of dissolving pulp for its largest (and practically only) application segment, namely the viscose industry: Metsäteollisuusyhtiö Stora Enso ilmoittaa luopuvansa liukosellutuotannostaan – ei kommentoi, tehdäänkö sen Kiinaan toimittamasta sellusta eettisesti viskoosia | Yle

Stora Enso’s Country Manager for Finland, Seppo Parvi (Direct quote from the news), commented that: “is disengaging from the global dissolving pulp segment for viscose production.”

Why on earth would a pulp producer no longer produce specialty dissolving pulp for its main application? The reason is perhaps the changing world and technology. Problems in China’s Xinjiang region can cause reputational damage in Europe/the Western world: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/29/style/china-cotton-uyghur-hm-nike.html, additionally, for the past 30 years, there has been talk about the toxic chemicals used in the viscose industry. Now, it finally seems that solutions have been developed for this as well.

Stora Enso applied for an environmental permit for a new textile fiber pilot plant in Sweden (Nymölla) and Finland (Joensuu Enocell). I concluded that the intention here would be to start up the process and test it in an intermediate phase before scaling it to factory size. They decided to build the pilot plant in Sweden: https://www.storaenso.com/en/newsroom/news/2021/2/stora-enso-to-host-tree-to-textile-demo-plant

So what might happen at Stora in the next year or two? Enocell, which produces 430,000 tons/year of dissolving pulp, will instead produce textile fiber yarn. The added value compared to normal dissolving pulp, which would be exported to a viscose factory in China (to be processed by Uyghurs?), is enormous when the export product is textile fiber yarn. I guess that Enocell will be made into Stora’s “industrial pilot plant,” and this will then spread more widely to other mills, where lines will be converted from normal paper pulp production to dissolving pulp production and further to a higher value-added product, textile fiber yarn.

There’s a good vibe around textile fiber business in the Nordics right now.

2 Likes

So, based on this, we expect news in the coming days that Stora and Hugo Boss/Nike/Marimekko/Blåguldklader have made a deal on new, even more human-friendly materials, at both ends of the production line, so to speak.
Old clothes are a problem, as they often aren’t suitable for recycling, so a material that can eventually be converted back into energy is a brilliant move by clothing companies.
We’ll see if Stora’s stock price will take off upwards today?

Perhaps not in the very near future, but Stora Enso’s textile pilot plant has started construction in Nymölla. The capacity is so large (2500 ton/yr) that it will be able to supply even H&M with clothes for their responsible collections once it’s ready and ramped up. The products will be “snatched” up :), Chinese people can dress in Uyghur rags…

Large fashion/interior design companies have been early movers. For example, the mentioned H&M and Ikea have invested early enough and joined the process development sufficiently early: Stora Enso yhteistyöhön H&M-groupin ja Inter IKEA Groupin kanssa TreeToTextilen teollistamiseksi - Stora Enso Oyj.

On 1.4.2021, the Regional State Administrative Agency of Eastern Finland has set aside Stora Enso’s application (found here: https://ylupa.avi.fi/fi-FI) concerning a substantial amendment to the environmental permit for the Enoell Joensuu plant for textile fiber production, deferring its processing. So, apparently, only Nymölla will get that pilot plant for now, and the raw material (dissolving pulp) would initially be transported there from other mills. In the future, Nymölla can easily be converted to produce dissolving pulp. Once the pilot has run long enough and the process is deemed OK, the entire factory will be converted to yarn production. I’m quite sure that on the day this information becomes public, it’s worth being a Stora shareholder.

Note: Stora Enso has not stated anywhere, not even in news published on its own website, that they are ceasing dissolving pulp production. It just ended for viscose applications. They probably have their own plan for dissolving pulp.

2 Likes

Pilot plant starting up in the coming months.

Today’s program: Stora Enso’s earnings live stream:

Analyst’s Q1 preview:

Stora Enso provided guidance for the current year in connection with its financial statements, stating that the company’s adjusted operating profit in 2021 will be higher than in 2020 (2020: adjusted operating profit EUR 650 million). We expect the company to reiterate its guidance.

3 Likes