Speqta - The dealmaker

Let’s open a thread for a very interesting Adtech/Content & Comparison & SaaS company from Sweden.

Excellent description of the company quoted from user Helel:

The company operates in the lead generation business. The purpose is to provide services that would direct visitor traffic to their buyers’ websites in a meaningful way.
This happens through two segments: AdTech and C&C.

  • C&C (Content & Comparison) means: maintaining various standalone comparison sites (Vinklubben, etc.) and e-commerce related customer traffic steering, “comparison collaboration” (Affiljet) with newspapers, etc., attracting visitors through discount coupons. In addition, Speqta is a consumer loan broker. You might notice, for example, Rahalaitos.fi, which is such a loan broker. Similarly, Ilta-Sanomat’s discount coupons are now through Speqta.

  • AdTech. Products: Shopello and BidBrain

Shopello is a Google CSS (Comparison Shopping Service. An online merchant can choose Google’s own Google Shopping or another CSS that buys ad space from Google for products on behalf of the client).

(Through the product Shopello, there’s an opportunity to advertise on Google on a CPO (Cost per Order) basis, as opposed to Cost per Click (CPC). Most CSSs operate on a CPC basis. Shopello offers the possibility of “not paying for nothing,” i.e., only billing its user if a click leads to a purchase. This is considered an edge. Shopello used to be Shopello BidBrain, but now BidBrain has been separated as its own SaaS-based product.

BidBrain is AI. It’s a data analytics engine that aims to optimize ad placement and collects money from clients for successful sales. Shopello operates in conjunction with Google, but the BidBrain system is also intended to be utilized outside of Google.

BidBrain requests access to the client’s (online store’s) Google Analytics data and rights to operate their Google Ads account with its automation to create ad campaigns.

Red Eye has been following since 2016 and continues to do so. Latest update from November.

Let’s talk a bit about the ownership structure. Insiders own about 20% of the company, and they also have options to subscribe for a few more percentage points. Two insiders sold about a third of their holdings in December, but this was explained as paying off a personal loan.

They had lent money to the company a couple of years ago, and converted these bonds into shares in 2019, which were then pledged as collateral for a personal loan.

The key drivers currently are thought to be 1) market awakening, 2) growth in the C&C segment through organic growth of Affiljet and possible acquisitions, and 3) potential new initiatives from within the company.

Red Eye believes that BidBrain development will show as costs in the near future and will weigh down earnings. Therefore, they lowered the target from 10 SEK to 8 SEK at the end of the year. However, BidBrain is not mentioned as a driver, and it seems to be quite experimental at the moment.

Q3 report. This year, the impairment of additional purchase price of 21MSEK strengthens earnings, and adjusted for this, the EBITDA margin would be just over 10%, but this still doesn’t seem weak to me, and sufficient cash flow should come from the C&C segment.

Speqta reports

**Risks! **

But fundamentally, it must be understood that this is a highly competitive industry. Google, in particular, is a potentially strong challenger to BidBrain at the CSS level. The good thing is that even a tiny fraction (on the order of a permille) of the market is enough for Speqta to be profitable. If the company still has even a shred of an advantage or success, I see a lot of potential relative to its current market capitalization. :rocket:

In C&C, there are also many players. Throughout its history, this company has run other food-related standalones under different names, and communities live and die in time. Speqta was previously named myTaste and listed on the stock exchange. This new strategy (which the company is now implementing, broad C&C/Affiljet + AdTech) was introduced a few years ago, I believe in 2017.

Growth has largely come from C&C. This year’s growth is largely explained by the Rahalaitos acquisition. However, there are also clear organic growth opportunities in this C&C, and expectantly, the current profitability is a kind of baseline, or rather, I see no reason to expect its profitability to significantly weaken. (me 2020)

BidBrain AI “smartly” utilizes the client’s own Google Analytics and Google Ads data and creates ad campaigns on behalf of the client. Google then bills BidBrain on a CPC basis, and BidBrain bills the client on a CPO basis. Everything here depends on how well the AI actually works, because no money comes without successful advertising.

In any case, third-party cookies are the way AdTech companies currently target their ads. When these are removed, it’s hard to say what will happen. On the one hand, a serious disruption will occur; on the other hand, it’s hard to say now whether Speqta’s BidBrain and its first-party data analytics will be a winner. On the other hand, since BidBrain seems to be based on the analysis of first-party data, it “shouldn’t,” in my layman’s assessment, suffer a major disruption itself. Secondly, the C&C cornerstone appears to be sound.

The SaaS aspect here is AdTech/BidBrain, which is launching this year. C&C/Affiljet is, in a way, an electronic service sold to various operators, but it doesn’t actually sell its own software for others to use. In this sense, this definition doesn’t matter if there is growth and money coming in.

Revenue 2020: 177,600,000 SEK

Market cap: 303,221,535 SEK

EV/Sales: 1.7x

P/E: 10.95

16 Likes
1 Like

Could this have been described in a couple of sentences in Finnish? SaaS Market Value, EV/Sales, and P/E ratios don’t quite manage to excite yet.

1 Like

3 Likes

Don’t the numbers and results matter the most, after all? :smile:
Currently researching the company and more info is coming!

3 Likes

???
Wasn’t this an Adtech/Content & Comparison company?
Is Rahalaitos.fi a SaaS company now :smiley:

2 Likes

So, they have one business area where one product operates on a SaaS model.

Bidbrain. In November 2020, the next generation of AI service was secretly launched; Bidbrain.com which is an AI-based SaaS service that bids transparently in the customer’s own Google Ads account and shares incentives with the e-retailer.

1 Like

The BidBrain in question is still practically in beta and doesn’t really generate revenue. Let’s be sensible :man_facepalming:

I don’t have the motivation to write more about this now, but I’ll summarize my opinion: This is a reasonably priced Sweden-Finland Adtech/C&C company that has suffered during Corona and bought Rahalaitos (which also suffered during Corona). If 2021 brings good organic growth, the company seems very cheap and there is clear upside potential in the valuation multiples. If growth doesn’t materialize, this might be correctly priced or even expensive.

On the other hand, I know smart investors who see this as a clearly undervalued value tech company. Do your own DD and draw your own conclusions :smiley:

6 Likes

Exactly. It doesn’t make it a SaaS company yet :smiley:

1 Like

Exactly! :smiley: Looks interesting!

1 Like

The company operates in the lead generation business. The purpose is to provide services that direct visitor traffic to their buyers’ websites in a meaningful way. If this scene is new to you, you’ll soon encounter a lot of unfamiliar acronyms, but I’ll try to explain them.

(If you’re fluent in Swedish, you can listen to the CEO explain)

This happens through two segments: AdTech and C&C.

  • C&C (Content & Comparison) means: maintaining various standalone comparison sites (Vinklubben, etc.) and customer flow management related to e-commerce, “comparison cooperation” (Affiljet) with newspapers, etc., attracting visitors through discount coupons. In addition, Speqta is a broker of consumer loans. You might notice, for example, Rahalaitos.fi, which is such a loan broker. Similarly, Ilta-Sanomat’s discount coupons are now via Speqta.

  • AdTech. Products are Shopello and BidBrain.

Shopello is a Google CSS (Comparison Shopping Service). Online merchants can choose Google’s own Google Shopping or another CSS that buys ad space from Google for products on behalf of the customer.

(Through Shopello, the product offers the possibility to advertise on Google on a CPO (Cost per Order) basis, as opposed to Cost per Click = CPC. Most CSSs operate on a CPC basis. Shopello offers the opportunity to “not pay for nothing,” i.e., it only charges its user if a click leads to a purchase. This is considered an edge. Shopello used to be Shopello BidBrain, but now BidBrain has been separated into its own SaaS-based product.)

BidBrain is AI. It’s a data analytics engine that aims to optimize ad placement and collects money from customers for successful sales. Shopello operates in conjunction with Google, but the BidBrain entity is intended to be utilized outside of Google as well.

BidBrain requests access to the customer’s (online store’s) own Google Analytics data and rights to operate their Google Ads account with its automation to create ad campaigns.

Red Eye has been following since 2016 and continues to do so. Latest update from November.

History. The trend isn’t bad though. These figures don’t include Q4 yet.

Let’s talk a bit about the ownership structure. Insiders own about 20% of the company, and they also have options to subscribe for a few more percentage points. Two insiders sold about a third of their holdings in December, but this was explained as paying off a personal loan.

They had lent money to the company a couple of years ago, converted these bonds into shares in 2019, which were then pledged as collateral for a personal loan.

Key drivers currently are thought to be 1) market awakening, 2) growth in the C&C segment through organic growth of Affiljet and possible acquisitions, and 3) potential new initiatives from within the company.

Red Eye expects BidBrain development to be reflected in costs in the near future, putting pressure on earnings. It therefore lowered the target from 10 SEK to 8 SEK at the end of the year. BidBrain is not mentioned as a driver, and it is probably very experimental at the moment.

Q3 report. This year, the additional purchase price write-down of 21 MSEK will strengthen earnings, and adjusted for that, the EBITDA margin would be over 10%, but this still doesn’t seem weak to me, and the cash flow from the C&C segment should be sufficient.

Speqta’s reports

Risks!

But fundamentally, one must understand that this is a highly competitive field. Google, in particular, is a potentially strong challenger to BidBrain at the CSS level. The good thing is that even a tiny fraction of the market (in the permille range) is enough for Speqta to be profitable. If the company still has even a slight advantage or success, I see a lot of potential relative to the current market value. :rocket:

There are also many players in C&C. Throughout its history, this company has operated other food-themed standalone sites under different names, and communities live and die in their time. Before Speqta, it was named myTaste and listed on the stock exchange. This new strategy (which the company is now implementing, broad C&C/Affiljet + AdTech) was introduced a few years ago, I recall in 2017.

Growth has largely come from C&C. This year’s growth is largely explained by the Rahalaitos acquisition. However, there are also clear organic growth opportunities for this C&C, and on average, the current profitability is a kind of baseline, or rather, I don’t see any reason to expect its profitability to significantly decline. (me 2020)

BidBrain AI “smartly” utilizes the customer’s own Google Analytics and Google Ads data and creates ad campaigns on behalf of the customer. Google then charges BidBrain on a CPC basis, and BidBrain charges the customer on a CPO basis. Everything here depends on how well the AI actually works, because no money comes without successful advertising.

In any case, third-party cookies are the method by which AdTech companies currently target their ads. When these are removed, it’s hard to say what will happen. On the one hand, a serious disruption will occur; on the other hand, it’s hard to say now whether Speqta’s BidBrain and its first-party data analytics will be a winner. On the one hand, since BidBrain appears to be based on analyzing first-party data, in my layman’s assessment, it “shouldn’t” suffer major disruption itself. Secondly, the bedrock C&C seems to be in order.

The SaaS aspect here is AdTech/BidBrain, which is launching this year. C&C/Affiljet is a kind of electronic service that is sold to various operators, but it’s not actually selling its own software for others to use. In itself, this definition doesn’t matter if growth and money are coming in.

15 Likes

In my opinion, high (currently over 50%) growth is not essential; moderate (low double-digit) growth and demonstrating continuity would suffice. Speqta is at a stage where the fixed costs of the business are largely covered, and depreciation/impairments burden the result, but cash flow is relatively strong.

Growth could come organically through Affiljet, standalone social media services, and BidBrain (AdTech). All of these are on schedule for H1 2021 or already underway. In the longer term, Rahalaitos should be freed from its shackles, and later, acquisitions/in-house projects are possible, which are not separately known.

Even moderate revenue growth would make profitability clearly visible, and the upside would be significant in the short term.

The mentioned very strong organic growth does not seem likely now, and growth would most easily be achieved through acquisitions. I don’t believe that C&C can grow super fast organically, even though new customer relationships have been acquired well now and even though the SMART concept has apparently worked. However, the target is only 20% CAGR organically.

BidBrain may have this and even greater potential, but nothing is known about it yet. Even with acquisitions on top of that, 50% looks distant. Perhaps with a one-off, truly successful acquisition (:ox:), revenue might grow close to that, but not sustainably, unless BidBrain truly takes off. Earnings, on the other hand, can grow much faster in the initial phase.

This cannot really be based on large (~50%) double-digit growth; the key element here is the affordable price for a relatively scalable business, combined with semi-good growth potential and cash flow. Perhaps safety first, fulfilling my pet peeve.

Conversely, I think that if this still had a clear track record of strong, mostly organic growth, then this would be almost an all-in candidate with practically zero downside. Then it would have everything, and the valuation could be 20x in a few years due to multiple expansion and earnings growth.

Separately, there is a completely megalomaniacal fantasy without any basis in reality that BidBrain would be a winner in post-cookie marketing and succeed in the global e-commerce scene. Expedia Group here we come! :sunglasses: Well, that’s enough of that. Ignore these last two paragraphs.

The CEO is extremely excited. :smiley:

Skulle du kunna kommentera liten om tillväxmöjligheterna? (Could you comment briefly on the growth opportunities?)

He mainly says that stabilt lönsamhet (stable profitability) has been achieved and that now they can press the gas in every vertical. However, the company’s management is now convinced that BidBrain has received good feedback and would be ready for launch.

11 Likes

Thanks @Helel, really great text. Apparently, you’re already familiar with the field? @Turskakauppias, the opening post could perhaps be tweaked a little, as it’s a bit short.

4 Likes

Oh, I’m just a layman devoted to securities.

7 Likes

This is it. In my opinion, organic growth would be the factor that would reduce the impact of high fixed costs and bring profitability more clearly into view. An acquisition does not actually improve the profitability of existing businesses unless some excellent synergy with the current business is found. At the same time, the company could also justify higher multiples than currently.

On the other hand, you are right that there is hardly much downside here, except for the continuation of the interest rate cap and the third wave of Corona :thinking: I still think a lot here relies on the revenue that BidBrain will bring in 2022, and that seems to be the key to whether the company is cheap or expensive. If BidBrain takes off, the stock price could easily multiply.

2 Likes

Good thoughts @Helel! I’m pretty heavily invested in this. I see it as possible that Redeye would raise the target price. The 2020 consensus was exceeded by a fairly wide margin. In my opinion, the stock is reasonably valued; currently, the entire company is actually valued below the acquisition price of Rahalaitos.

3 Likes

Thanks for the great answer and effort! I added that text to the original post :v: :sunglasses:

5 Likes

You’re welcome. I’ve had this thread (or due diligence, or whatever you want to call it) since December, when I started monitoring whether my bear scenario would materialize or if the company would achieve stable profitability (stabilt lönsamhet) or even :rocket: :full_moon:

I haven’t usually started threads myself, but I do research things.

8 Likes