In the psychology of investing, very little is said about how different investment styles suit different personalities. When I think about my own investment history, I’ve tried almost everything possible, and different styles have caused different feelings. Gradually, I’ve come to realize that, for example, trading doesn’t suit my personality at all, and similarly, startup investing (or investing in very small growth companies) has caused stress.
Perhaps it’s time to move from discussing the superiority of different investment styles to the suitability of different investment styles for each investor’s personality. When one finds the style that best suits them, they commit to it and learn its most important features out of genuine interest, not out of obligation. And through that, the results also improve.
For example, for a person who is fast-paced in life and enjoys games, index investing can be very unmotivating, whereas trading might be the important thing. For a somewhat lazy and comfort-loving person (like me), quality investing can be a good option. For a person who is not particularly interested in investing, index investing can clearly be the best solution. (In addition, the investor’s age and previous experience naturally have some influence.)
The most important thing in investing is to find a strategy that one can live with during both good and bad times. (Even index investing can be a bad option if one loses their nerve in a severe bear market and realizes losses and stops investing). An investor’s biggest enemy is not a stock market crash, but the investor’s own mind.