ServiceNow - the conductor of the AI revolution

Recently, whenever the “man in the leather jacket,” i.e., NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, has highlighted trending companies, the returns on those stocks have been outrageous. Most recently, he was hyping up ServiceNow.

So, what does the company’s future look like in the midst of the AI revolution? If Huang is to be believed, it looks bright. Or is it different this time, and is Huang’s vision wrong? Let’s start, however, with what problem the company actually solves in the world.

History

ServiceNow was founded in California, USA, by Fred Luddy in 2003. At that time, however, the company went by the name Glidesoft Inc. until 2006. For the first couple of years, founder Fred Luddy was actually the sole employee, and it wasn’t until 2005 that the first five employees were hired. By 2007, ServiceNow had already turned its business cash flow positive with a revenue of $13 million.

ServiceNow went public in 2012 with a valuation of $210 million, when the previous year’s revenue was just under $100 million.

The milestones of the current decade have been significant partnerships. In 2023, the company announced it would begin collaborating with NVIDIA to integrate AI services into enterprise support software. In early 2026, partnerships were further announced with Anthropic and OpenAI. The goal is to bring their Large Language Models (LLMs) into ServiceNow’s AI platform.

Coming to the present day, the company’s revenue has grown to $13 billion, and the operating profit for last year was over $4 billion. At its peak, the market capitalization hit $230 billion but has now dropped to $93 billion.

Business

All larger companies have a need to streamline processes, and even a small time saving accumulates quickly into a significant financial saving if the processes are repeated numerous times daily. ServiceNow has built a platform intended not just to store data or process tickets, but to model and automate these constantly recurring tasks: approvals, support requests, solution automation, etc. In practice, the platform helps companies manage everything from IT support to HR processes.

Today, however, the business is also strongly linked to AI, and ServiceNow is considered a kind of “coordination layer” between AI agents and enterprise systems. Artificial intelligence vastly increases the number of automatable processes, but in addition to AI, companies also need an audit trail, compliance logic, integrations with legacy systems, and workflow orchestration. So, while many AI startups might be able to create a chatbot, an AI agent, or a Co-pilot-style UI, this is not yet enough for the large-scale utilization of AI in larger corporations.

Valuation

In the spring of 2026, the stock has been hit hard, similar to other software and SaaS companies. It has come down about 62% from its peaks, meaning the stock is hovering around $90 USD, whereas just over a year ago, investors were paying upwards of $230 USD at the highest. The 2024 multiples were truly in the range of EV/S 20x, P/E 155x, EV/EBIT 66x, and FCF yield 1.6%, meaning a lot of good news was priced in. Since then, AI disruption fears have weighed down the entire sector, but the core question for ServiceNow is whether a company that actually benefits from the AI revolution has been thrown out with the bathwater.

At the current price, the valuation looks considerably more reasonable than it did a couple of years ago. Based on last year’s earnings, the P/E is around 53x. EV/S has dropped to approximately 6.5x, which is nearly a 60% discount compared to its historical median. The Forward P/E is now only about 20x, the PEG ratio is under one at 0.81, and EV/FCF is around 19x. Thus, the current valuation is no longer outrageously expensive, at least, but it certainly requires earnings growth to remain strong.

Outlook

The momentum has continued to be quite strong, as Q1 2026 subscription revenues grew 22% year-over-year to $3.67 billion, once again exceeding the upper limit of their own guidance. Nearly 40% more new contracts worth over a million dollars were generated in Q4 2025 than a year earlier, and the group of customers with over $5 million in ACV (Annual Contract Value) grew by about 20%.

The traction of AI products has also started to show concretely. The Now Assist AI package is on track for $1.5 billion in annual ACV in 2026, which is 50% higher than the original target. Now Assist contracts worth over a million dollars were signed in Q1 at a rate over 130% higher than a year earlier.

Guidance for full-year 2026 subscription revenues is $15.5–15.6 billion, meaning growth is still expected to be around 20–21%. Additionally, cash flow is strong, and the board authorized an additional $5 billion share buyback program. On the other hand, in typical US company fashion, stock-based compensation is quite generous, which would dilute shareholders if shares were not also being bought back simultaneously.

Risks

Of course, it’s not all sunshine and rainbows. Firstly, AI disruption could hit ServiceNow itself. If future AI agents are capable of replacing workflows without a separate orchestration platform, ServiceNow’s role as a coordination layer will diminish, but at least for now, the trend has been the opposite.

Secondly, competition is intensifying. Salesforce, Microsoft, and numerous smaller AI-native startups are all targeting the same enterprise budgets. ServiceNow’s advantage is its deep integration into customers’ IT ecosystems and long-term contracts, but the competitive pressure is real.

In any case, as things stand, AI is more likely to increase the need for managed automation. We’ll have to wait and see if Huang is right with his vision this time as well. I don’t own ServiceNow yet, but I’ve at least added it to my watchlist.

65 Likes

Here is a tweet about ServiceNow stock purchases by some interesting parties. :slight_smile:

https://x.com/tradewithcong/status/2057079139790983316


6 Likes

Take these with a grain of salt.

It seems many politicians have their investments managed through discretionary mandates (täyden valtakirjan salkku), meaning the owners have no knowledge of where the money is being invested.

The trades look like large blocks bought by an algorithm and then split across various client accounts.

4 Likes

Good opening. I have owned ServiceNow for a little over a quarter, and for my part, there is still a lot of research to be done so that my knowledge of the company is at a high enough level to truly understand what I own. Recently, many forum members seem to have bought the stock, so hopefully we can get some active discussion and new perspectives going.

Regarding forward-looking and cash-flow-based valuation multiples, it’s worth noting that they do not include stock-based compensation (SBC), which last year was slightly more than the company’s GAAP net income. In contrast, these have been deducted from the earnings in the trailing figures. This year, earnings are expected to grow by about 20 percent. Although this does not directly affect cash, it is a real expense, as to avoid dilution, ServiceNow buys back its own shares for cancellation in an amount corresponding to the stock awards.

Below is a link to a message I wrote in early February about my ServiceNow purchases.

And finally, three YouTube videos I think are good for those interested in the company. The first is possibly the most comprehensive video-format company analysis of ServiceNow I’ve found online, published by Drew Cohen in February.

The second and third videos discuss the Q1 results and future outlook. Liam Hyland goes through what he considers the most significant points of the interim report and creates a list of key metrics to track in future reports. In the third video, Brian Stoffel presents a more bearish perspective. In the first quarter, earnings growth was slower than revenue growth, and specifically, customer acquisition costs grew (+44%) at double the rate of revenue (+22%).

8 Likes

IT services company Cognizant & ServiceNow are joining forces to help companies with AI oversight.

The companies are launching a joint management tool that automatically monitors AI systems in real-time to ensure they comply with legal regulations, such as the European Union’s AI Act.

The goal is reportedly to make the responsible and safe use of AI easier at an even larger scale.

“The market has solved AI access. What enterprises now need is the ability to operate AI responsibly at the scale and speed their businesses demand,” said Sriram Kumaresan, Global Head of Cloud and Infrastructure Services at Cognizant.

https://www.investing.com/news/assorted/cognizant-partners-with-servicenow-on-ai-governance-platform-integration-432SI-4727292

2 Likes

I know ServiceNow very well at a hands-on/tech level, having managed a large instance in a major corporation for >10 years.

Exactly as the OP wrote,

“ServiceNow’s advantage lies in its deep integration into customers’ IT ecosystems and long-term contracts, but competitive pressure is real.”

To put it more bluntly, ServiceNow has an extremely strong vendor lock-in strategy. With ServiceNow, a client company can do ‘almost everything’. Once you go in up to your armpits… getting out can be nearly impossible.

ServiceNow is expensive, very expensive. And as far as I know, they don’t tolerate downsizing existing systems (in terms of annual pricing).

Trump has worked hard to ensure that in Europe, American technology is no longer automatically the most sought-after.

For some, at least in Finland, something as “funny” as Efecte/Matrix42 might come to mind.

5 Likes

Mihin Sitä Säästäis? - the gentleman discussed ServiceNow among others in his video; its segment starts around the 6.5-minute mark. :slight_smile:

Over the years, my investment style has shifted toward looking for new buys in the so-called “trash can.” In other words, my portfolio often ends up with stocks that have experienced a major decline, but which I believe will turn around in the coming months and years. This is a high-risk strategy, but it can yield very high returns if successful.

In this video, I highlight the latest such picks, which are Adobe and the recently purchased ServiceNow.

4 Likes

Here are some random reflections; the sensible thoughts are borrowed or otherwise mimicked. The incorrect and muddled conclusions are mainly my own. :slight_smile:

ServiceNow has taken a nasty hit, partly due to AI fears; additionally, there have been questions—partly for that same reason—about how growth will continue. But on the other hand, more than half of Service’s new business is based on “usage” rather than the number of seats (licenses). This means AI agents performing tickets on behalf of humans don’t reduce the company’s revenue; instead, this consumes AI tokens and the company charges based on that usage.

Valuation multiples have looked wild, especially previously, but then again, the company’s growth, margins, and cash flows have remained strong. So, things look good and it seems to be an AI beneficiary rather than an AI victim, but to an uneducated eye like mine, the valuation multiples still look like they expect quite a lot from the future.

I wouldn’t dispute the quality, and on the other hand, the “expensiveness” can be justified by how Service locks in its customers and, as noted in the thread, instead of sales/discounts, Service generally tends to raise prices.

The guidance was a disappointment to investors, and the future direction is indeed more important than the present and history. However, the performance remains strong, and looking further ahead, the solid foundation and AI opportunities make the company look interesting in my eyes.

You have to pay for quality because the future is low-risk and growing strongly and profitably, or how is it? :slight_smile:


Salesforce is doing well in a way, although its share price has been coughing and there are fears regarding AI stuff there too, but based on what I’ve read and my gut feeling, Service is ahead in terms of AI. Salesforce’s guidance was also a disappointment, but the valuation is lower, the company is also profitable with strong cash flow, and the Agentforce side has grown well regardless.

Salesforce’s growth is slower and, as I understand it, it doesn’t have as solid a foundation as Service, nor are customers as tightly locked in as they are with ServiceNow. Salesforce is more uncertain, slower-growing, riskier in general, and in more of a losing role in the AI race than Service, or how should one think about it? :slight_smile:

Oh, and Salesforce has its own thread:

7 Likes

When considering ServiceNow’s valuation based on cash flow, it is important to note the significant amount of stock-based compensation. Stock-Based Compensation (SBC) stands at 1.8B and the reported Free Cash Flow (FCF) is 4.6B. The SBC-adjusted FCF is therefore 2.8B. Share buybacks and using them for compensation do not show up in the FCF, which is why calculating such an “owner-earnings” figure can be useful.

This, of course, applies to many other companies in the software sector as well.

8 Likes

ServiceNow’s reported Q1 EPS was 0.97 and GAAP EPS was 0.45. Quite a staggering difference. Similarly, the large volumes of share buybacks need to be normalized against how much has been paid out to employees as compensation. And that share is significant.
Otherwise, my anti-AI-eats-everything play consists of NOW+ADBE+CRM. Let’s see how it goes. :slight_smile:

5 Likes

As a follow-up to this, a video was released a moment ago where Cohen has gathered five of what he considers the most significant business updates since February, the financial targets for 2030 announced at the company’s Analyst Day, stock valuation, insider transactions, and the development of the share count.

Summary by Gemini

Current Situation

  • ServiceNow’s stock has fallen 60% from its peak and 40% during the current year [00:00].

Five Business Updates

  • New strategy as an AI “guardrail”: The company is moving from just managing IT workflows (tickets) to becoming an operating system or “control center” for AI agents. The goal is to bring security and rules to the operation of AI models so they don’t make destructive errors in corporate databases [01:44].
  • Interface redesign: The platform has been modified to be more AI-friendly, and the new look strongly resembles the ChatGPT interface [04:05].
  • 100-day AI guarantee: Since companies often struggle to get a real return on investment (ROI) for their AI investments, ServiceNow promises to complete its customers’ AI projects in under 100 days with the support of the company’s own engineers [05:38].
  • New pricing model: AI features are no longer separate paid add-ons but are now included as standard in all software packages [05:54].
  • Tailwind from AI coding: As the number of lines of code is expected to increase 20-fold by 2030 due to the widespread use of AI, the number of errors and IT support requests will also grow. This is a significant advantage for ServiceNow’s core business, IT Service Management (ITSM) [07:13].

Financial Targets and Valuation

  • Revenue target: Revenue for the current year is expected to be $15 billion, and the company aims to double it to $30 billion by 2030 [08:42].
  • Profit margin: Although the company advertises aggressive growth targets, the video estimates that the company’s real profit margin, adjusted for stock-based compensation (SBC), will settle at around 30 percent [11:05].
  • Valuation level: Based on 2030 forecasts, free cash flow and profits would settle at approximately $7.2 billion [11:23]. At the current $90 billion market capitalization, the company is priced at 12.5 times the estimated 2030 earnings [11:42]. If the market accepts a P/E ratio of 25 in 2030, the current stock price could have an upside of up to 100 percent [12:36].

Insider Actions and Share Count

  • Insider trades: The company’s management has canceled their automatic stock sale programs (10b5-1) [13:11], and CEO Bill McDermott bought $3 million worth of company stock in February [13:25].
  • Dilution: In the most recent quarter, the company’s diluted share count exceptionally decreased for the first time. For the full year, however, share buybacks are still expected to be mostly used to offset dilution from employee stock-based compensation [15:01].

The valuation uses free cash flow adjusted for stock-based compensation and the $30 billion revenue guidance provided by management for 2030. The profit margin is assumed to rise to 30% in the mature stage, which Cohen considers a moderate assumption in the video. In this case, the result after taxes would be 7.2 billion, making the forward P/E for 2030 approximately 12.5 at the current stock price. If the stock were valued at a P/E of 25 then, the stock would have room to double by 2030, resulting in an annual return of 16%. In my opinion, the growth assumptions in the video are quite ambitious but not entirely unrealistic. At least I have to believe so, otherwise I wouldn’t have a reason to own this.

8 Likes

Trend reversal in the air? Pre-market is now +5%.

2 Likes

Below is a discussion on how ServiceNow CEO Bill McDermott believes the rapid adoption of AI will strengthen the company’s position. According to him, ServiceNow offers a centralized system that allows companies to monitor and manage their AI agents; furthermore, SN provides a “kill switch” to stop rogue agents.

McDermott does not believe that AI competition will weaken the company, but rather estimates that AI itself will increase the demand for software and support growth.

Key Points

  • ServiceNow CEO Bill McDermott said the company is becoming increasingly important as businesses deploy more autonomous AI agents.
  • McDermott said ServiceNow’s platform includes a “kill switch” that can stop rogue AI agents and pushed back on concerns that AI competition will hurt the company’s growth.

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/22/servicenow-ceo-kill-switch-rogue-ai.html

4 Likes

The earnings report came out and it was OK. Nothing mind-blowing, but it managed a slight beat as usual.

The premarket shows that it would wipe out yesterday’s drop. However, these premarket things are extremely unreliable.

The RSI (below the image) seems to be forming a higher low, which usually signals a buying opportunity. Of course, the stock is below both the 200-day and 200-week moving averages, which in turn suggests that more pain is in store. Volumes have also been high lately. So, are the buyers or the sellers right?

13 Likes