Great and important opening!
Previously, for each purchase and sale, I used to write down answers to a few key questions from the perspective of so-called second-order thinking. A quote from Mäkinen’s blog 2018:
According to Howard Marks, second-order thinking in investing takes into account things like the following:
- What are the company’s possible future scenarios?
- Which of these scenarios do you believe will materialize?
- What is the probability that I am right?
- What does the mainstream of investors think about this matter?
- How does my view differ from the majority of investors’ views?
- How does the current price take into account the consensus future outlook compared to my own views?
- What is the sentiment in the stock? Are investors too eager or unnecessarily pessimistic?
- What happens to the stock price if the general view proves correct? And what is the price if I myself am right?
However, I often trade quite frequently, so this started to feel laborious.
Nowadays, for selling/reducing positions, it may be enough if the expected return falls significantly below my target of 15% p.a. In addition, for some positions, I might just shift focus from an asset with a poorer expected return to one with a better one, etc. So I no longer bother to make these entries for every move.
- Example: this autumn’s sales of Fortum and Sampo. I believe I can find assets with better expected returns on the market after these have risen somewhat.
I have moved to a much lighter format for bookkeeping. It’s just one tab in Excel; “case analyses”. The primary purpose of my entire bookkeeping is to remind me of the qualitative characteristics of the carefully selected companies. It helps keep the company-specific (bottoms-up) approach clear in mind, regardless of what kind of news about macro or some crisis is on the KL front page.
In Excel, I describe numerically or on another scale (e.g., - - - / + + +, traffic light, or something else) a few of the most important key characteristics for each long position:
-
Previous quarter’s result, scale: traffic light red-yellow-green. For example, for a company with a yellow light, I know I need to start pondering and monitoring it more closely. I might consider selling a red one, etc., depending on the overall situation.
-
Crisis resilience (related to e.g. financial situation etc.), for example Kamux: “+++” because growth is very profitable, the financial position is good, and economic total lockdowns like the corona crisis are weathered easily.
-
ROE (long-term), for example Kamux: “25%” (in my own plan, I try to find companies > 20%, and 12% is the absolute minimum)
-
Scalability, for example Qt Group: “+++”
-
Competitive advantage, for example Talenom “+++”
-
EBIT margin (long-term), for example Smart Eye “+++” because it will eventually be a really profitable business, or numerically for Qt Group: “25-35%” because that will surely be achieved later
In addition, I describe the main points of the case in a few sentences verbally (risks, valuation, and my own position’s margin of safety to target prices, key return drivers of the case in the medium term, etc.). For this, I usually pick a few sentences from an analysis I’ve read or similar, or I write it briefly myself.
After this, there is a column where I estimate the multibagger potential or otherwise the expected return (e.g., fair value estimate and expected return in 3-5 years). Example: Smart Eye: “400-500 SEK in 2023-2024” or example Kamux: “earnings growth over 15% p.a.”. The purpose of this column is to ensure that in the long run, I am involved in a company whose expected return meets the 15% in my plan. The situation is constantly evolving, which is why this column should also be re-evaluated after each quarterly result or analyst update, etc.
Finally, there is one more column for important miscellaneous comments, usually a web link or similar.