Inderes Coffee Room (Part 6)

An economics professor at a university once noted that he had never failed a single student, but then he failed an entire class at once. This particular class had insisted that #socialism works and that in it, no one would be #poor and no one #rich, but equality would prevail.

The professor said to the students: “OK, let’s try socialism with this class. All grades will be averaged and everyone will receive the same grade, so no one fails and no one gets a five.”

After the first midterm, the grades were indeed averaged and everyone received a four. The students who had studied hard were indignant, while the students who had studied little were happy. As the second midterm approached, the students who had studied little before studied even less, and even those who had studied hard wanted to get off easy, so they also studied less.

The average for the second midterm was only a two, and no one was happy anymore! The same trend continued, and for the third midterm, everyone was already given failing grades. As the exams went on, the grades no longer improved, but bickering, blaming, and name-calling increased instead, leading to a general sense of ill will and a lack of desire for anyone to study for the benefit of others.

To their great surprise, all the students failed the course, and the professor explained that socialism also always fails in the end, because when the reward is great, the amount of work required for success is also great, but when the state takes the reward away, no one tries or even wants to succeed.

It couldn’t be simpler. There are five lessons to the story:

  1. You cannot enrich the poor by impoverishing the rich through legislation.

  2. Whatever is given to one without working for it, someone else must have worked for.

  3. The state cannot give anyone anything that it did not first take from someone else.

  4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.

  5. When half of the people think they don’t have to work because the other half takes care of them, and when the other half thinks it’s not worth working because someone else gets the benefit, it is the beginning of the end for any nation. :rofl:

165 Likes

This story would definitely provide some great leverage even for election debates, as it’s based on true events :drooling_face:

1 Like

Investment risks

25 Likes

The critical discussion in the Qt thread has moved investors to the sell side.

14 Likes

As a Qt shareholder, it’s nice to read well-argued and justified bear and bull cases. :slight_smile:

For example, the most liked post in the Orthex thread is probably a well-written and justified bearish post.

Thinly justified claims/remarks sometimes just frustrate investors, and occasionally they give off troll vibes to some.

22 Likes

I need to exchange a few hundred into dollars for a trip to the States. Does anyone have any recommendations on where to get the best exchange rate?

1 Like

With that amount of money, the difference in the final total across different places will likely only be a few euros. It’s easiest if you just exchange it at the airport. The rate might not be the best, but you won’t be ripped off either—unless you buy something from a restaurant—and you’ll get the best return on your time.

10 Likes

This can only be true if companies were intentionally selected from so-called creative industries, or if there is otherwise something rotten in the companies’ culture.

I would recommend trying this first in, say, freight transport—and why not even on an airplane.

This would solve the nurses’ pay gap, as 4 nurses per shift would indeed be enough instead of five.

In schools, students would welcome this with joy, as a refreshed teacher could hammer into the head of even the most stubborn brat in four days what previously five days weren’t enough for.

Russian arrogance at its purest.

It is, of course, a completely different matter for a citizen of a country at war to sue neighboring countries that have banned tourism, but what if you were turned away from, say, China, the USA, or Canada?

Would you sue your destination country if you were denied entry?
  • Yes
  • No
0 äänestäjää

“Tourist”. I suspect that they were actually acting on behalf of the Russian state when cooking up that lawsuit, naturally aiming to stir the pot because in the West, courts can sometimes make strange decisions… so it was a bit like pressure-testing the reasoning for the ruling.

14 Likes

67 Likes

From what I know of history, to my knowledge, nothing similar has been implemented in universities even in so-called socialist countries. As such, it is a dead-on-arrival idea even by their standards.

As for the concept of socialism, it can encompass just about anything depending on who you ask. Someone might say that there are 150 million socialists living in the US (those who vote for Democrats).

My employer doesn’t pay me to write essays here, so I’ll just state that the matter is much more complex than those five bullet points would suggest.

4 Likes

Alokas is really asking for it. :smiley:


(I love this stuff :smiley: )

I’m on the same page. :smiling_face_with_three_hearts:

21 Likes

Even a horse kicks out of love :smiling_face_with_three_hearts:

Love GIF - Love - Discover & Share GIFs

19 Likes

Watch out, bears! :smiley:


EDIT: @saku spotted this, that Verneri went out hunting bears.

22 Likes

There are some pretty tough bears out there, so hopefully @Verneri_Pulkkinen is ready

31 Likes

The bear dance went a bit overboard. I felt really bad for Varelius, even though I was initially quite open to the idea that management was maximizing their bonuses.

What is wrong with people?

1 Like

It works very easily in freight transport.
Five drivers for four shifts.
One day off for everyone in turn.

Or was this what you were after?

And how does that productivity remain the same?

Overtime decreases. Well-being improves.
Reducing the use of temporary labor,
Significantly reduces operating and repair costs as well as other damages.