Bittium. What thoughts?

Hi @Karoliina_Malmi

Happy New Year.

This Spanish contract has caused some confusion among investors. As you previously mentioned in your reply, the earlier 50M contract did not include product sales. Apparently, neither does this new 20M contract. I wonder if this new contract is included in that 70M “extension agreement” published late last year? (In the original agreement, the total sum was approximately 120M and now it is over 120M.) And how is that earlier 50M order distributed across different years?

I understand if the contract cannot be further elaborated on, but any possible information is welcome.

Thanks again in advance.

19 Likes

A very good question. And I don’t believe the customer would demand intentional ambiguity in communicating about such an order, so one has to conclude that this is either intentional on Bittium’s part or, even worse, sheer incompetence. Bittium’s announcements have been criticized for the same issue before. It is likely the responsibility of the communications officer. But it was nice that the total value of the order is now estimated at over 120 million.

3 Likes

This is how I’ve interpreted the Indra cooperation; there probably isn’t anything new here (either), but regardless.

The original press releases mentioned a deal value of approximately €120M for the Indra deal, but in the latest communications, the wording has changed to “over €120M”. This shouldn’t be dismissed with a shrug. In the defense industry, such a change in phrasing often suggests that the basic framework is locked, but probable additional orders (further development, customer-specific versions, production support, etc.) are already being anticipated, even if more specific guidance can’t—or won’t—be provided yet.

Furthermore, it’s worth remembering that this isn’t a “quick case”. I discussed this with an acquaintance who was involved in the ramp-up of mobile phone production at Nokia back in the day. His message was quite clear: production doesn’t scale to full speed in a few months, and often not even in a year. When you add defense sector certifications, NATO requirements, and Spanish (as well as Latin American) bureaucracy, it is entirely realistic that significant radio production will only be fully underway on a 1–2 year timeline.

However, this doesn’t mean that nothing is happening in the meantime. A typical model is:
– licensing and technology transfer
– pilots and pre-series
– limited delivery batches
– only then volumes

Bittium continues to do billable work in those intermediate stages: software, integrations, customer-specific modifications, and support. These might not make headlines, but they will show up as euros over time.

Furthermore, if Indra takes these solutions to Latin America, the requirements and variations will differ from those in Europe, which typically increases development work rather than decreasing it. That’s why I see “over €120M” not as a ceiling, but rather as the current floor for this collaboration.

In summary:
This is not a fast rocket or a hype case. This looks more like slow, step-by-step industrial cooperation where the money comes with a delay but more sustainably. The market often either gets excited too early or gets bored too quickly; reality lies somewhere in between.

20 Likes

Here are Kinnunen’s comprehensive comments regarding Bittium’s new order from Indra. :slight_smile:

Bittium has received a EUR 20 million order from the Spanish company Indra related to the Tough SDR technology licensing agreement. The order is part of the strategic cooperation announced in December and reinforces our view of the company’s excellent earnings growth outlook for 2026. In practice, the order increases the revenue stream we expect from Indra in the coming years, as we estimate it will be recognized as revenue in 2026-2027. We are not making any forecast changes at this stage, but the news clearly reduces the risk associated with the forecasts for the coming years and allows for a potential positive surprise in the 2026 guidance.

14 Likes