It would have been nice to hear your own thoughts, but the text clearly shows that it was produced by AI. I think it would be good to always include sources and at least mention the use of AI. The question posed to the AI, or “prompt,” should also be included.
The topic itself is quite relevant and current: what could be Bittium’s role in drone warfare and their countermeasures in Finland and internationally?
Well, of course I use AI when considering something a bit more thoroughly, but it’s new to me that one should publish prompts? My individual posts are not solely AI text but a combination where AI is, of course, strongly involved.
Even Inderes’ analysts have answered the question about AI use by saying “everything goes through AI nowadays,” and you don’t see prompts or separate mentions in their work either. Shouldn’t it be self-evident today that AI is involved in discussions? And since when has basic forum writing required sources? I mentioned the news link at the beginning from which this discussion with AI started.
And instead of participating in this discussion yourself, with or without AI, 99% of your contribution was to criticize my messages and then you repeated my question. You should probably use AI…