I came across a claim in this thread via Google and wanted to share a different perspective. Why it relates to the investment thread: the question is how private healthcare could offer doctors a competitive alternative to public hospital work. Money is a metric, not an end in itself.
Topic: doctor’s earnings and private practice in a university hospital area.
Doctors’ earnings are salary income. On-costs must be paid from salary income, usually 25% and a bit more on top of the gross. In addition, overtime, especially on weekends and public holidays, must be paid significantly more.
As a result, when a doctor’s working hours start to fill up on an annual basis, they are practically forced to take leave. There’s no budget to pay for overtime. Doctors run private practices because they enjoy their work.
The problem with the private sector, for example in the field of Terveystalo, is that in their pursuit of maximizing revenue per doctor’s working hour, they choose not to offer services where revenues are lower. This is a problem because, from a doctor’s perspective, a low-income patient with a complex or difficult-to-diagnose disease is more interesting and rewarding to treat than a 35-year-old avid athlete who frequents blood labs multiple times a year, monitoring their testosterone levels, for example.
This somewhat exaggerated example above is what the investment scene would call lifestyle services or wellness activities.
The private sector could very well do much more interesting things, especially modern technologies would enable the construction of much smaller and more cost-effective hospitals. Instead of concrete mausoleums, smaller units performing demanding surgery – there is global demand for this worth billions. For example, removing bullets from brains is a demanding task for which there is little expertise in the world – among others, in Finland, so-called stereotactic surgery is mastered at a completely different level.
I am disappointed with Finnish companies in the field because it seems they are not interested in creating and developing new things. In other words, Finnish technology companies in the field thus have no customers in Finland to sell to, and therefore no springboard to conquer America with better imaging, robotics, and so on.