@Kauno_Saario, on this forum, the discussion culture dictates that claims must be substantiated. Therefore, I cannot disregard your original message. I consider it inappropriate fear-mongering.
A directed share issue requires a compelling financial reason under Section 9:4 of the Finnish Companies Act (OYL), respect for equality under Section 1:7 of the OYL, and a qualified majority under Section 5:27 of the OYL.
Finnish Supreme Court (KKO) precedent 2018:19 further supports that the principle of equality must also be taken into account in directed share issues.
Tecnotree cannot simply move out of Finland and shake off Finnish minority protections. The transfer of the registered office to another EEA country itself requires a procedure under Chapter 17a of the OYL, a qualified majority of the general meeting (OYL 17a:14 and 5:27), a creditor protection procedure (OYL 17a:11), and a redemption right at fair value for shareholders voting against the transfer (OYL 17a:18). Moving outside the EU/EEA area is not a straightforward transfer of the registered office, but would require an even more burdensome corporate restructuring. So, this is not an easy loophole to simply circumvent Finnish rules.