Nokia as an investment (Part 4)

The interesting thing here is that Nokia didn’t even reach those valuation multiples when broken down into parts, yet it falls directly along with them at the same multiples. Now I have to decide between modest options or blowing my vacation fund. Or maybe I’ll wait a little longer, since I already bought between €9–€10.

I would see €5–€6 as a decent valuation for just Nokia’s mobile business on the threshold of 6G. I would consider €8–€10 a fair price without any hype premiums, as growth is definitely coming. It feels like we’ve returned to that dark place, wallowing, where we were nudging each other a couple of years ago, even though almost everything—except the success of the mobile turnaround—has changed and seems to be materializing into profit. It wouldn’t actually be a bad thing if mobile dropped into a low-sales/high-margin business. It’s only a good thing if we get rid of the dead weight, even if it means changing the strategy.

I’m proclaiming strong belief in the future at these prices, even though I have no credentials. I believe that its function as an inflation hedge (mobile business) is fading and new revenue streams will grow. Nokia’s entire business has changed or is in the process of changing. Nokia has invested heavily in the turnaround, and it remains to be seen whether the payback on these investments will be at the same level that the data center market, which is predicted to stall, leads one to expect.

7 Likes

It would be interesting to know, for example, what the largest R&D investments and Bell Labs’ research activities are focused on. Is the mobile side still receiving the same level of investment as before? Would it be better to divest the entire unit, or does securing the patent portfolio depend on further research and development in those areas? In any case, no one is questioning the costs of Nokia’s research activities anymore.

There goes Noksu, down 6% in the US. Tomorrow I’ll need to buy more, following the management’s lead for my long-term portfolio.

3 Likes

It’s starting to feel a bit worrying for Nokia and other companies in AI, isn’t it? These extreme drops that are happening every day now could really start to pick up steam if things don’t calm down soon. It already feels like a washout might have happened, but if not, people might start looking to sell even more while there are still profits to be made. If you listen to CNBC, they aren’t too positive on AI stocks in general right now. Let’s hope things turn around soon.

Let them worry, whoever is worried. Personally, I’m buying once I see the market overreacting. My buying program has started, and I could keep loading up throughout this year if the price keeps falling. Then, I’ll look towards 2027 and beyond. The management’s investments also add confidence that good things lie ahead.

2 Likes

But regardless of how the stock moves, certain things are very real. 2.8 billion euros in orders for something that didn’t exist not so long ago. In a single quarter.

I’d rather have positive news and a falling stock price than negative news and a rising stock price. As a long-term shareholder, these fluctuations don’t really matter. At least not to me.

8 Likes

I really have to remind everyone that when stock prices generally fall, American news channels and the like invariably trumpet “game over.”

And when indices are rising, it’s the other way around. Everything is a “screaming buy” and target prices are like castles in the sky.

Following news headlines won’t end well. Generally, it’s better to be on the side of adding [to your positions] when the “professionals” headline how you should sell everything.

That’s how it was in 2022 and 2023, and for quite a while, even though in hindsight, we were already deep into an uptrend.

On the other hand, at €14 Nokia prices, BREAKING headlines were blaring that the rally was just getting started.

Summa summarum: Don’t rely on media headlines to make impulsive decisions in one direction or the other.

10 Likes

Unfortunately, it seems the market doesn’t care about the management’s insider purchases. I assume you’re sitting on the buy button now, because if this isn’t an overreaction, then I really don’t want to see what one looks like when it comes.

1 Like

Can anyone tell me why the management is buying? I mean, the bubble hasn’t even begun to deflate properly yet, and Nokia’s stock could easily be at 5€ before Christmas, but if only one knew why the management is buying. I bought Nokia myself for the first time ever today, purely because the management is buying, even though I don’t see the stock as being anywhere near cheap. In my opinion, only below 5 euros is there enough of a margin of safety to dare to go almost all-in. My guess is some kind of major M&A deal.

2 Likes

The insiders keep buying! They must know something!! Surely no one is stupid enough to throw their own money down the drain.

11 Likes

Overreaction occurred in both directions and will likely continue to do so.

4 Likes

The rise was fast, but it feels like the decline went even faster. Thanks to Lexus and other contributors for the great analyses. We hope things calm down soon and that we get to see share prices stabilize above 10 euros.

14 Likes

Let’s post part 2 of the dialogue here as well, as I discuss the significance of AI for Nokia in it.

rkurppa said:

A perfectly good answer, but the problem is perhaps that the market values the Nokia Group, not just the Nokia AI & Cloud outlook, which is still a fairly small part of the Nokia Group’s net sales.

Let’s first compare the actual AI and cloud sales in 2025 and 2026:

  • Q1: €180m → €350m (+49% with the current corporate structure and excluding the impact of currency exchange rate fluctuations)
  • Q2: €220m → €446m (+105% excluding the impact of currency exchange rate fluctuations)

Last year, AI and cloud orders were about €2.4 billion, while over the last four quarters they totaled about €5.4 billion, roughly as follows:

  • Q3 2025: €650m
  • Q4 2025: €950m
  • Q1 2026: €1.0bn
  • Q2 2026: €2.8bn

Let’s also keep in mind that the book-to-bill ratio in Q1 was just under three, while in Q2 it was as high as over six. Therefore, significantly more orders have been accumulated than have yet been recognized as sales.

The Q2 order intake of €2.8 billion was likely exceptionally high and should not be seen as a normal level. Instead, a quarterly order pace of about one billion euros seems like a fairly justified assumption: Nokia reached this in Q4 and Q1 and surpassed it sovereignly in Q2. However, the exceptionally strong order intake in Q2 actually suggests that the order trend might be turning towards an even higher level, especially since the order pace for IP networks accelerated in Q2.

This, of course, does not mean that one billion in quarterly orders will translate directly into quarterly sales. That requires time and for the order pace to remain high. Hotard has previously stated that the time from order to delivery in optical networks is typically about 12–18 months and slightly less in IP networks. On the other hand, Nokia stated that about half of the €2.8 billion in orders in Q2 would be delivered over the next 12 months. The current order intake thus provides concrete visibility into future net sales.

If we consider that a quarterly order pace of about one billion is a realistic baseline for the near future and that orders begin to show in sales with a delay, I think it is entirely possible that the quarterly pace of AI and cloud sales will approach the one billion euro level during next year. In that case, we would be talking about an annual net sales of about 4 billion. If a four-billion AI and cloud sales figure is reached in the near future, it would be so significant for the current Nokia that its impact on the whole can no longer be considered minor. And I do not necessarily consider that to be any kind of ceiling in the long term, either.

The market, of course, prices the entire Nokia, not just AI & Cloud. That is precisely why I think it is essential to look at how the entire business composition of Nokia is changing. If AI & Cloud grows from its current small business into a multi-billion euro business in a relatively short time, its significance at the group level will change rapidly. At the same time, based on Q2, the order dynamics in IP networks seem to be improving.

AI-RAN is another trend to keep in mind. Its significance for Nokia in the early stages may be even greater in terms of streamlining the cost structure than in increasing net sales: if moving towards a more software-driven business reduces dependency on proprietary custom chips (and the significant R&D investment associated with them) and increases the share of high-margin software sales, the impact on the currently poorly profitable Radio Networks could be substantial. However, AI-RAN is a long-term project and will only be commercially launched in earnest next year, with volume deliveries possible in 2028, according to Hotard.

Summa summarum: what is currently still a small business with a less than 10 percent share of total sales is, in light of the orders and capacity investments decided by management, turning into a business of significant size for Nokia, where the growth potential is great.

11 Likes

As can be seen from Meta’s and Microsoft’s earnings, AI investments continue to be strong, which supports Nokia’s growth strategy​:+1:

12 Likes

During the IT bubble, companies like Cisco and Alcatel received massive orders, but they never converted into revenue… the stock prices of both companies fell by over -80%.

It raises the question for me: could the same happen to Nokia, Ciena, and others?

12 Likes

This is an excellent question, and a topic I have also been warning about. My own outlook is relieved now that we are in the middle of the earnings season, at least for the short term ahead. As far as visibility goes, it looks good, and virtually all companies in the industry (for example, Google and SK Hynix) have signaled continued strong AI infrastructure construction. I have been following this very closely, as I am also aware of the risk.

However, this is clearly a situation where everyone is pushing full steam ahead until they potentially hit a wall, at which point the narrative could change overnight. Either the complex debt structures or the house of cards will collapse, or it won’t. And mere speculation is causing absolutely staggering market volatility—as we have now seen. The wave upward was strong, and so is the current wave downward. As for the next wave upward, I for one am not yet certain whether we will see new highs or not. The markets seem to constantly surprise with outsized moves.

The markets are now clearly pricing in this growing uncertainty regarding the sufficiency of funding and the profitability of investments (beyond just a few major customers), at least temporarily—and on the other hand, this has provided an opportunity to reinvest in or increase positions in the AI sector. The market is also clearly being tested here—are investors prepared to fund the AI hype and the construction of data centers? In other words, will the stock performance of hyperscalers stabilize (first)…?

Below are a few comments from various companies on the outlook during this earnings season.

SK Hynix: With the growing demand for AI infrastructure and services, data center investments are expected to remain strong even after next year, although the schedules of individual projects may be affected by physical constraints such as power availability and data center construction itself.

IREN: Demand for data center construction still significantly exceeds supply, and due to physical constraints (such as power grid connections, permitting, and land), it is extremely difficult to build reliable, operational AI capacity fast enough to meet the market’s rapid growth.

Microsoft: Responded to accelerating AI demand by increasing its data center capacity over the past fiscal year with 31 new data centers, bringing the total to 88, and aims to nearly double its total capacity within two years.

Micron: Demand for memory technology (DRAM and NAND) continues to significantly exceed manufacturers’ production capacity, and Micron estimates that the exceptionally tight supply situation will continue until 2028, as the setup of new greenfield plants and the silicon resources required for advanced HBM memory production limit the growth of bit shipments.

Oracle: Demand for cloud infrastructure (OCI) and AI capacity is growing at an exceptionally rapid pace, which caused the company’s remaining performance obligations (RPO) to swell to $638 billion, and plans for net capital expenditures (CapEx) of approximately $70 billion are in place for 2027 for new data centers to meet accelerating demand.

Meta: In the coming years, Meta will focus on maximizing its AI capacity in 2026–2027 and building a flexible foundation from 2028 onwards, while simultaneously developing personal and business agents designed for billions of people and companies.

Broadcom: Reported record revenue of $22.2 billion driven by strong demand for AI chips and estimates that its AI segment revenue will rise to $56 billion in 2026 and exceed $100 billion in 2027, supported by multi-year partnerships (e.g., Google, Anthropic, OpenAI, and Meta).

Google: Alphabet reported strong 24% revenue growth in Q2 fueled by AI demand and cloud services, and is raising its 2026 capital expenditure (CapEx) estimate to $195–205 billion to alleviate the ongoing undersupply of AI capacity.

Here are a few interesting earnings release dates from the perspective of Nokia’s optical business.

Lumentum Aug 11, 2026
Coherent Aug 12, 2026
Marvell Aug 20, 2026
Ciena Sep 3, 2026

Edit: By the way, is it slightly concerning that Meta left its future investments quite open and didn’t provide a capex figure? Is the company being cautious due to the market?

32 Likes

In connection with the Q1 report, Hotard mentioned that design wins have been coming in well and would be visible in the order backlog from Q2 onwards. That is what happened. I personally could not find any such comment in connection with the Q2 report, so is a decline in order intake to be expected in Q3?

It can happen to anyone. Was Cisco once the most valuable company in the world? It’s still alive, but just an average technology company. The intensity of the decline across the board was surprising in its magnitude. A rise from there will still come. And it could happen quickly, too.

5 Likes

A stock that is easy to challenge and can be pushed around at will. Nokia’s position in the value chain is starting to look very interesting to big American tech giants like NVIDIA, Qualcomm, etc. The decline in Nokia’s share price is starting to look like a forced sell-off… These Magnificent 7+ companies will soon have the opportunity to acquire mobile networks in the USA (the only one in the Western world besides Ericsson) and, in addition, get a compelling AI stake at a bargain price. Is this crash anything more than just a sectoral slump? Could NOKIA soon head to the US at a price of a little over ten?

4 Likes

I believe that insiders are buying now because they are currently allowed to. The pace is so fast that management surely has in the back of their minds that at any moment opportunities could arise that would prevent them from buying due to insider information. For this reason, they do not want to spread the purchases out over a longer period of time.

7 Likes