Monster - Can this still grow?

image

Monster Beverage Corporation is an American beverage company that manufactures energy drinks, such as Monster Energy and Burn. The company was originally founded in 1935 as Hansen’s in Southern California, and at that time, it sold juices. In 2012, the company changed its name to Monster Beverage after energy drinks became its primary source of revenue.

As early as 2020, Monster controlled 39 percent of the global energy drink market, being the second largest after Red Bull. The company has expanded its operations through acquisitions, such as the purchase of the CANarchy Craft Brewery Collective and the acquisition of Vital Pharmaceuticals, the owner of Bang Energy, strengthening its position in the energy drink market.


Through the eyes of an investor

Monster has indeed become quite a giant, and regarding Monster, I think it’s particularly important to understand the history a bit. :slight_smile:

https://x.com/BrandFinance/status/1825881110607482926

image

https://x.com/Quartr_App/status/1795449965491224951

image


and then to the present day

Demand for energy refreshment drinks weakened in the second quarter, which is especially reflected in the US market, where consumers are tightening their purse strings due to economic uncertainty. The company is raising its beverage prices by 5% starting in November, which could be a risk if consumers end up switching to cheaper alternatives; on the other hand, there are opportunities – after all, the company has always ultimately managed to keep revenue moving, and with small price increases, more is left on the bottom line.

Analysts are, in any case, concerned that the price hikes might weaken sales, especially considering increased competition. TD Cowen lowered Monster’s sales and earnings growth forecasts and estimates that the company may have to offer discounts in the future to attract consumers back, meaning sales could start to stall and then discounts will have to be implemented anyway. It doesn’t help Monster that big retailers like Walmart and Costco are attracting customers away from traditional stores where energy drinks are often sold.

On the other hand, Monster is confident in its market position and its ability to raise prices. The company’s executives emphasize that while the situation is challenging in the US, demand for energy drinks has recovered in international markets following economic crises. Management believes that energy drinks are seen as “affordable luxury,” and the strength of the brand will carry it through market storms. I don’t know how the talk of optimistic and positive Americans should be taken… :slight_smile:

The company continues to implement its growth strategy, especially internationally, which may provide safety if the US market specifically does not recover as expected. It is important to monitor the company’s reaction to the market situation and its ability to adapt to changes in the competitive environment.


At the time of writing, i.e., August 2024:

P/E : 31.1
P/S : 6.19
P/B : 7.79


Monster’s Q2:

Monster’s second-quarter 2024 sales grew by 2.5% compared to the previous year. Net income rose by 2.8%, even though demand for energy drinks in the US and other countries grew more slowly and retail “foot traffic” weakened, global growth in the energy drink market continues.

image


More info from Monster’s page, including this:

image

image

23 Likes

Monster is clearly a generational thing. The family’s teenagers are ready to invest in it, while a boomer’s energy drinks are Coke/Pepsi and coffee. Monsters cost around €3 per can and don’t taste good to me, but as the younger generation buys and the old ones die off, my opinion doesn’t matter. The margins are certainly there, given that the contents of a can cost maybe €0.50 by the time it reaches the shelf.

I don’t understand this part. Walmart is a traditional American store. Nothing is probably more American than endless suburbia and the Walmart stores located there where you can buy absolutely everything → including Monster.

10 Likes

The Coca-Cola Company, by the way, owns at least 16.7% of Monster (that was the ownership in 2015, I can’t find more recent news right now. Monster has done some share buybacks since then.) :cup_with_straw:

7 Likes

I’ve been considering opening a thread for Monster for a long time, but I haven’t had the energy to write a comprehensive enough opening post.

Monster is one of the longest-held investments in my current portfolio. I’ve been buying it mostly regardless of the price whenever I’ve had “extra” cash with no other specific use for it, and the plan is that I won’t need to start selling it for years to come.

At its current share price, it is the second-smallest holding in my portfolio, but the total sum is still in the five figures, so I follow it quite actively.

Personally, I don’t really drink Monster, but I want to have exposure to the energy drink market, and I follow a lot of extreme sports where Monster is heavily involved as a sponsor.

7 Likes

image
Ah, it really warms the heart to see this kind of action from real companies. :star_struck: Sure, it’s expensive, but there’s still something admirable about sticking to the buyback strategy until the very end. This ultimately boosts EPS growth too, even if absolute growth is sluggish.

5 Likes

The tweet says something like this:

Celsius has dropped about 70 percent from its May highs, but over the last five years, it has still clearly outperformed Monster. Celsius has continued to grow strongly in terms of revenue, free cash flow, and margins. Celsius’s debt-free balance sheet also stands out favorably, so from the tweet, one could conclude that the stock’s long-term return is significantly better compared to Monster.

https://x.com/ZeevyInvesting/status/1842574253016977764

image

image

7 Likes

Once again, I’m raving about Monster’s past. :cowboy_hat_face:

The company’s revenue is expected to rise to 7.5 billion dollars in 2024, representing an average annual growth of 22 percent. Since April 2002, the company’s stock value has risen by a staggering 120,000 percent.

https://x.com/Quartr_App/status/1856660809918665161
image
image


Let’s also post some of the present, meaning the Q3 results as well. :slight_smile:

https://x.com/Earnings_Time/status/1854665989767454876

image
image

4 Likes

Below is a good tweet about Monster, which might interest those interested in the company. :slight_smile:

https://x.com/FluentInQuality/status/1875258222292169130
image
image

Someone wondered that if Celsius gets a loyal user base, then…

image
image

3 Likes

Investing visuals has once again made an interesting comparison of Monster and Celsius. :slight_smile:

https://x.com/ZeevyInvesting/status/1878441805261210111
image
image

4 Likes

@Arhi_Kivilahti’s tweet thread below might be of interest in this company thread, even though the focus is naturally on Red Bull. :slight_smile:

https://x.com/ArhiKivilahti/status/1886663200889815326

image
image

4 Likes

Here is what I think is a good comparison of different beverage manufacturers :slight_smile:

https://x.com/ConsensusGurus/status/1881441950722613614
image
image

2 Likes

A pretty good short video from STNX’s investment podcast about Monster (from March). An interesting company, but I should probably avoid investing in it as a heavy consumer of Monster, as I would just get too attached to the stock.

And as a small afterthought to this message, Monster is now quite a cheap energy drink in the Finnish market - and I believe widely elsewhere too - unlike what was lamented earlier in the thread. As I understand it, this is based on Coca-Cola’s logistics enabling lower costs for the company. As an example of a price comparison (albeit from a consumer’s perspective), Monster often costs €2.15 for a half-liter can, while Nocco (0.33 l) costs at least €2.65.

https://x.com/STNXfi/status/1897898487418699798

4 Likes

Monster posted record sales and exceeded the 2 billion mark for the first time. Revenue and profit grew significantly, and EPS also rose clearly.

All key figures thus moved in a good direction – even considering currency effects.

https://x.com/samsolid57/status/1953550042851422475


image
image


Company Materials

image
image

1 Like

An update/correction to this: I found from Coke’s annual report that The Coca-Cola Company’s ownership stake in Monster was 21% (31.12.2024).

2 Likes

Monster’s Q3 out. Still in strong growth.

November 6, 2025

Third Quarter Highlights

  • Record quarterly sales grew 16.8% to $2.20 billion

  • Operating income grew 40.7% to $675.4 million

  • Net income grew 41.4% to $524.5 million

  • Diluted net income per share grew 41.1% to $0.53 per share

Monster Beverage Q3

3 Likes