Global politics has ramped up over the past six months, especially as the specific issues of Ukraine, Gaza, Venezuela, and Greenland have dominated column inches and media attention. The Arctic dimension is crucial for Finland’s security and, more broadly, for NATO and the US as they seek to close and secure their northern flank. How do Russia and China view US expansionist efforts in Venezuela and Greenland?
Greenland is currently a “hot potato” for the US and Denmark (including NATO & the EU). Speculation regarding US actions and the desire to bring Greenland under its control carries immense political, security, and economic implications, even from the perspective of the global balance of power. Modern economies are competing for resources. Greenland possesses vast mineral reserves (including gold and uranium). Depending on the source, the US purchase idea involves 10–100 trillion USD. If military pressure and the exercise of power become relevant, it will undoubtedly lead to a further acceleration of the defense industry’s growth on both sides of the Atlantic… Can Finland—or entities in Finland—benefit from the situation more broadly than just through the already agreed icebreaker deals? Where can security and returns be found in relation to Greenland?
What are the effects of economic pressure on the Danish economy? The US has used general tariff policy to categorize foreign powers into “good” and “bad” trading partners. For Denmark, the future remains to be seen. Novo Nordisk has already felt the squeeze of the FDA and the US administration after an 8 billion USD acquisition fell through. The local Pfizer reaped those rewards.
On the Danish stock exchange, Grönlandsbanken has reached an all-time high today (January 8, 2026) on the Copenhagen Stock Exchange. Is the financial sector a tool for speculation or a weapon of economic warfare?
It would be interesting to follow this potential geopolitical upheaval of the modern Western world from an investor’s perspective. How can one hedge against potential risks, and how can an investor act profitably in such an unpredictable and volatile market situation, where the struggle for “world dominance” between East and West is intertwined?
11 Likes
The USA is after mineral resources. I don’t know how long the permitting process would take under US laws. Assuming that some kind of environmental and other assessments would need to be done if Greenland were part of the United States, this would cause a considerable delay in terms of exploiting potential mineral resources.
I don’t know if the Trump administration is aware of, for example, the movements of the ice sheets. That is, if you drill a hole straight down today, in a year the hole will be crooked, meaning the ice has moved. This is what destroyed those bases built into the ice sheet back in the day.
The Trump administration has hardly embraced science in the best way—science that, in their view, is perhaps easily bent to one’s liking. Good grief! Greenland is quite a “hell” for mining operations, even without considering the movement of the ice sheet.
There is no easy solution for exploiting the minerals. It could be that a ton of some mineral produced costs significantly more than the money spent on producing it. It would be great if someone could explain these things to Trump.
Even those dog sled patrols Trump disdains are more effective than infantry in Greenland.
So, profits in Greenland are a complete pipe dream. If there had been opportunities, Denmark would have exploited them long ago.
7 Likes
On the other hand, the (growing) values of gold, silver, and rare earth metals determine the profitability of exploitation despite challenging and expensive production conditions. Of course, there are many moving parts here—metals have a price, security has a price, and then Trump’s ego, i.e., “winning,” surely has its price.
I personally believe in some kind of deal and wonder who and into which sector those trillions will fall once an agreement is reached. In Trump’s view, maybe in just a couple of months… The intimidation is of such a level (and according to the news, there is fear in Denmark) that Trump will get his way one way or the other.
1 Like
Icebreakers are at the heart of controlling Greenland. Wärtsilä and ABB key technologies (Azipod and diesel) caused the cancellation of Russia’s icebreaker construction: Russia Scraps $200M Icebreaker Contract Due to Sanctions and Shipyard Layoffs - The Moscow Times
The USA has ordered a bunch of icebreakers from Finland. Navigating through ice without icebreakers is limited to flying, and heavy equipment cannot be transported by planes, nor can troops be resupplied. We have leverage. From the US perspective, Russia at least has no business being there if their icebreaker fleet cannot be maintained or renewed. Why has the USA closed its previous bases and left only one if it considers the region important? Is the answer that the interests are actually commercial? But is it even profitable to exploit those massive resources? Is Denmark so stupid that they have left them unexploited? The same applies to companies for whom land borders don’t matter that much. Why isn’t there someone in every corner opening various mines and drilling rigs? I would still consider the fuss to be a storm in a teacup. Greenland just sounds like such a nice place to build a golf course. After all, the Gulf Stream is already right there in the nearby waters.
7 Likes
Well, it will certainly melt over time… If not metals, if not security, then what is Trump’s mission worth? Warfare? Money? Or is it just worth the ego and sphere of influence?
Big money and (prestige) power are at stake, anyway – in one way or another 
The share price of the small GrønlandsBANKEN has doubled in a few months. Is some kind of economic cornering going on there?
1 Like
If the United States were to take Greenland by force, I would assume stock prices would fall broadly across Europe. This would be particularly pronounced in small countries like Finland, which are seen as peripheral areas. This is what happened when Russia invaded Ukraine and during the financial crisis. The fact that the United States would use force against a NATO country should be an even more earth-shattering event. Western Europe’s success has been based on a rules-based world order and predictability, with the United States acting as its guarantor. If the United States were to take Greenland only through heavy pressure, but still diplomatically, the impact would be similar but smaller.
I would see the European defense industry as one of the few winners in this situation. European countries would be forced to invest more in defense and, above all, develop their own weapon systems. I believe the stock prices of BAE Systems and Saab in particular would rise, as they offer alternatives to US systems. For example, Canada is already seriously considering purchasing Gripens instead of the F-35. Another trend would be that the dependence on US IT systems would have to be reduced. I have long been concerned about how critical systems run on US cloud services (AWS, Azure, Google). For this reason, I have invested a small amount in the French OVH Group, whose OVH Cloud service is an alternative to these three big tech giants. OVH Group provides cloud services especially to the public sector, for which data sovereignty is important. I have opened a separate thread about this company on the forum.
17 Likes
I have been considering the Danish stock market myself. In the short term, Denmark is facing a sluggish country risk, which will likely turn into an upturn if an amicable solution is found. Particularly Novo Nordisk (Denmark’s largest stock), in my opinion, has taken a hit from the prevailing situation. Would a political solution bring normalization to the share price?
Secondly, a potential deal would likely involve extensive commercial cooperation with Denmark and Greenland. Which sector in Denmark could be a particular beneficiary? What significance does it have for the national economy if the US injects billions upon billions in purchasing power into Denmark? How would Danish/Greenlandic banks react to such a thing? Danske has recovered from its recent difficulties back to its old normal price levels, +50% meaning 300+ DKK…
2 Likes
I consider the possibility of Denmark selling Greenland to be the most unlikely scenario of all. This only reflects Trump’s mindset, in which he imagines everything is for sale. In the same way, Trump seriously thought that peace could be achieved in Ukraine in a day by making an economic deal with Russia. Likewise, peace was supposed to be brought to the Middle East by buying Gaza and turning it into the Riviera of the Middle East. Denmark has made it very clear that only Greenlanders themselves can decide on joining the United States. Currently, Greenlanders have no desire to join the United States. Although Greenlanders occasionally criticize Denmark, Denmark nevertheless provides Greenland with full autonomy, two seats in the Danish parliament, and funds 25% of the budget. I don’t believe the United States would be able to buy the opinions of Greenlanders, especially since they would lose the opportunity to decide in the future how Greenland’s natural resources are used. For instance, the Trump administration has not exactly listened to the opinions of Indian reservations regarding environmental issues affecting them.
But if Greenland were to transfer to the United States, the most ideal situation would be if a majority of Greenlanders wanted it and Denmark received significant compensation. Denmark would likely use the money for the common good, such as healthcare, elderly care, and education. Denmark would also likely establish a sovereign wealth fund (hyvinvointirahasto), similar to Norway. Companies operating in the Danish market would benefit most from the nation’s increased wealth. Novo Nordisk, on the other hand, operates globally, so the impact on its stock price would be smaller. Banks, insurance companies, and asset managers operating in the Danish market could be good investment opportunities in this situation. Danske Bank also has operations in many countries, so the price impact for a bank operating purely in the Danish market would likely be greater.
3 Likes
Denmark might not actually sell Greenland, but an economic cornering/takeover wouldn’t be difficult—though expensive. Buying real estate, acquiring the island’s largest companies, and as Trump has already spoken about giving a six-figure bribe to every Greenlander (it hasn’t been clarified exactly in exchange for what) would suddenly bring, for example, at a level of 100,000 USD for each of the approx. 60,000 Greenlanders, 6,000,000,000 USD to the island. Quite a lot for a small autonomous/independent economy? Denmark probably wouldn’t like it, but the EU/NATO likely wouldn’t burst at the seams. It would be the “mother” of all hybrid operations…
Perhaps the aforementioned surge of Grönlandsbanken, whether in terms of speculation or a takeover, is one indication in this direction.
1 Like
One option for a Finn planning to FIRE could be to embark on a Greenland adventure. I wonder how quickly you could get citizenship? Spend a couple of years as a Greenlandic citizen to get 100 grand in the bank and some new Greenlandic friends? Maybe head back to Finland after that, though… Even though the scenery in Greenland is stunning, a forestry hobby might be a bit hard to pull off. There are plenty of places for snowmobiling, though.
1 Like
https://x.com/i/status/2009879323428425916
With those freezing temperatures, the yield % can’t really turn positive easily.
Just a reminder about the conditions.
Live Ventusky - Weather forecast, radar and wind maps Ventusky - Sääennuste, tutka ja tuulikartat | Ventusky
3 Likes
With those freezing temperatures, winds, and water reserves, it might be a better location for data centers than Finland. In fact, the southernmost part of Greenland is clearly further south than Helsinki – no info on the weather except for today
2 Likes
Danish stock market situation as of Jan 13. Down approx. 9% over a year. Up over 7% since the beginning of January.
Greenland doesn’t seem to be “on the agenda”, at least in the big picture.
Danish banks are hitting record highs across the board today, Jan 14, and in part last week. Are they already salivating for dollars to grease the wheels of the economy?
1 Like
Gold and silver are peaking today. Nordic defense industry: Saab and Kongsberg at all-time highs today. Danish stock market -2.35%. Within that, the small Grönlandsbanken is up over +5%.
The stark reality of Trump’s mere tariff threat… Any other observations?
2 Likes
Any other observations?
Shares of cloud service provider OVH Group also rose +11.88% today. I mentioned this in a previous comment as a stock that could potentially benefit from this crisis.
2 Likes
The Trump effect - all talk & pure zigzagging for 2 days on the Danish stock exchange. A picture is worth a thousand words…
Novo Nordisk +3.5% & Danske +2.5% today.
1 Like
