However, offshore wind power does have some advantages. At sea, there are fewer obstacles to the wind, and thus more energy can be obtained. Of course, the higher the pole is located, the less friction affects wind speed. In many countries, however, terrain features are more challenging for wind power than at sea. This therefore means that offshore wind power produces more consistent output than onshore.
I also see regulation at sea as easier. All noise, aesthetic, etc. aspects are easier at sea.
The cost is indeed significantly higher than onshore, but I believe the newest ones will be better in this regard. Cadeler’s operating logic can also lead to lower project costs (they aim to ensure higher utilization rates for vessels).
Yes, a lot is happening on this wind power front in Asia as well. Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan, in particular, are very interesting in this respect. Japan, however, has a windier side that requires floating solutions.
I understand that if one wants safer investments, this is probably not at the top of the list. I myself clearly see this as an investment that requires more monitoring. Like many other investments related to floating capital items.