Many investorsâ greatest attention is focused on stock picking. And itâs no wonder. Media headlines report on prevailing trends and which companies are the next stock rockets, and which shares you can still pick up in the hope of hefty dividends. Selling is rarely discussed, i.e., when should one divest from companies?
Hereâs a fresh video from the guys at Sifter, with Q1 as one of the themes.
The value of the Sifter Fund decreased by 7.9% during the first quarter of the year (Sifter Fund Global PA class, 31.3.2025). Please note that the Fundâs historical return is not a guarantee of future returns. Market downturns are part of equity investing. While uncertainties and price drops always feel unpleasant, they can also offer good buying opportunities for long-term investors.
The beginning of the second quarter was stormy due to Trumpâs tariff news, which caused the markets to dive, but the recovery was ultimately just as swift. Sifterâs value rose by 5.3% in AprilâJune, although it is still down 3.0% from the beginning of the year. Overall, the portfolio has developed in line with the global stock market.
Please remember that historical returns are no guarantee of future returns.
00:00 Introduction 00:20 Fund performance 00:53 Rising sector 03:07 Top-3 Gainers 03:29 Declining sector 05:30 Top-3 Losers 06:25 Which company was sold and which replaced it 10:55 Portfolio changes and comments 17:19 Importance of earnings growth 19:00 Microsoftâs earnings growth 23:55 Cintasâs earnings growth 30:34 Portfolio earnings yield
Could it be some kind of system bug. At least in AlmaTalentâs service, financial statements are available from 2024 backwards. I donât know from which system Finder retrieves its data.
Hi Ruonis, this is largely due to the fact that the Financial Supervisory Authority required SIPA companies to submit a specific type of financial statement four times a year, with a particular emphasis on the companyâs solvency. For some reason, Finders and similar platforms cannot directly integrate these figures into their services.
However, you can find the key figures for all Investment Service Companies on the Financial Supervisory Authorityâs website https://www.finanssivalvonta.fi/til
@Santeri_Korpinen At the beginning of the thread, someone had asked Sifter for an analysis of S&P Global. I couldnât find one quickly, but it would be really interesting to hear Sifterâs current opinion on that company.
Absolutely agree. S&P Global is still (in my opinion) one of the highest quality companies in the world. However, FactSetâs lowered forecasts have also been reflected in S&P Globalâs stock. Therefore, it would be interesting to hear current views from outside my own bubble as well.
Here, in turn, is Sifterâs Q3 portfolio review. Darn, my spring Alphabet challenge immediately aged poorly.
It looks like tomorrow Iâll be releasing my challenged and @Ville_Kivinen filmed Sifter office visit. This is truly a Sifter week on Inderesâ sites.
An interesting way to get to know the fundâs personnel and processes more closely.
I learned, among other things, that Sifterâs screen is really strict and a large group of experts spar on matters. The investment committee ensures that the rules are not deviated from.
This is, of course, a commercial collaboration, but I still take my hat off to the fund that has existed for so long. Thatâs quite an achievement in the industry, as funds are often merged into other funds.
I also learned that wow, these funds have heavy regulation.
Hereâs a fresh October review of the portfolio from Sifter.
Top-3 10/2025 / Total Return in Euros
Lam Research +19.7 %
Alphabet +17.8 %
Mettler-Toledo +17.5 %
Bottom-3 10/2025 / Total Return in Euros
TOMRA Systems -16.5 %
Texas Instruments -9.7 %
ADP -9.7 %
An interesting observation regarding SP500 companiesâ margins.
About 50% of S&P 500 companies have reported weakened net margins
Companiesâ profit margins are under pressure across the board. About half of S&P 500 companies have reported weakened net margins â especially in sectors most heavily impacted by tariffs and cost inflation, such as consumer products and discretionary consumption. In many cases, tariffs and increased production costs have had to be borne by the companies themselves, as their weak pricing power prevents passing additional costs onto prices without losing demand. In Sifterâs view, this highlights one of the most important characteristics of a quality company: pricing power. We have not observed a similar phenomenon with Sifter companies. Based on our analysis, we own companies whose products and services are critical to customers. These companies have pricing power, which enables profitability to be maintained even during cost pressures. This has been observed before, for example, during the high inflation years of 2022â2023, when the portfolio companiesâ margins remained high.
Interesting thoughts from quality company investor Santeri Korpinen on the impact of AI on investing. The Sifter fund avoids uncertain software companies, even though they have exposure to the semiconductor industry and âinfrastructureâ.
I am excited that we are launching a four-part Quality Investing School podcast series, produced in collaboration with Sifter and Karo HĂ€mĂ€lĂ€inen (Karoâs Grill).
In the series, Karo and I delve into what quality investing means (e.g., in academic research) and how it can be applied in practice for long-term investing.
The first episode was released just today. I hope this provides listeners with useful insights.
This time at @Karo_Hamalainenâs Grill Quality Investing School, the theme was key figures and analysis.
Topics: 0:00 Start and the most important key figure 6:54 MSCI quality metrics 8:45 ROA 9:26 ROCE 11:35 Sifterâs screening metrics 13:06 Gross margin 16:42 Operating profit 19:14: ROIC 20:37 Cash flow 22:54 TSMC as an example of a quality companyâs key figures 25:49 Net debt 32:07 Valuation 40:30 Qualitative company analysis 42:21 Quality of corporate management 48:02 Episode summary