2 Likes
Thanks @karhulalainen for this find - I think this also deserves attention in the Nokia thread.
In short: The stars are aligned for Nokia’s development in the coming years. The US administration will do everything in its power to ensure that the technology is fully deployed both in the USA and elsewhere in the Western world.
I therefore suspect that the US administration will push AI-RAN forward. And as part of this tech battle, Nokia’s infrastructure side is naturally included, not forgetting the potential brought by CPO component manufacturing. This expertise is a hot area in the coming years - China’s new chip technologies (GPU) are also, as I understand it, based on optical data transfer - and Western countries must be able to respond to this. Of course, the advantage of Western countries is still that TSMC produces a much more technologically efficient base than SMIC.
And here is a video from Broadcom, Nokia’s competitor in the CPO market, related to the topic.
14 Likes
And if the fundamentals aren’t clear, here’s a bit about them.
So according to JPM, the stock has significant upside potential if the targets are met, as there is room for valuation multiples to rise.
The difference with Ericsson is that Nokia is part of AI growth, whereas Ericsson, with roughly the same valuation multiple, currently is not. The quote below is from another source.
The valuation is roughly equivalent to that of its historical competitor Ericsson, which, unlike the Finnish company, has no AI-related activities
And I would also point out that JPM didn’t actually include that (CPO) component manufacturing in this assessment. And of course, it’s not in Nokia’s forecasts either. If that becomes a big deal, there’s even more upside potential in the multiples than before, and of course, it would also provide direct leverage to earnings.
It’s good that there’s an analysis firm from the United States that values Nokia!
21 Likes
@Lexus: Has Nokia really announced that it will start manufacturing CPO switches itself, which is an area that Broadcom has dominated, as the video you linked also shows, and Nvidia and Marvell are also strong? According to GPT5.1, “The greatest value of Nokia’s InP photonics factory is not related to CPO switches, but rather to strengthening Nokia’s own high-performance optics products in 1) long-haul, inter-data center (DCI) and metropolitan network coherent connections, 2) intra-data center short-range solutions (ICE-D, ZR/ZR+), and 3) rapidly growing pluggable modules, the demand for which is accelerating with AI data centers – in these segments, InP offers Nokia the clearest competitive advantage and most profitable growth.”
6 Likes
Nokia has stated it manufactures CPO components, as well as those pluggable modules. But I suspect that the greatest potential lies specifically in the components, which is certainly indicated by the 25x capacity increase and talks of several million units. One can then consider their use cases - even just by the fact that Nvidia’s name was brought up in the same context at CMD. It is also known that Nvidia apparently already has a supplier for components, but I suspect there would still be room for more.
In the current situation, switches are probably the primary target (there are already product announcements for this, for example from Nvidia), until in a few years, development moves closer to GPUs and TPUs, etc. Or at least this is my understanding - meaning there’s a good chance this will become a technological mainstream in the early 2030s.
So, in the current situation, demand is growing strongly for those pluggable modules (point 3) and, in David’s words, “these babies are shipping”, but the hidden potential is the internal data center business for components (point 2). Now, we just need more concrete information on these matters - hopefully, something will start to unfold during next year.
15 Likes
[> Dell’Oro Group’s 3Q25 report: #OpticalTransport System market up 15% Y/Y, driven by Cloud Providers (+58%) and strong DCI momentum (+34%). YTD share gainers: #Ciena, #Nokia, #1Finity, #Adtran, #Cisco & #Smartoptics.](https://x.com/DellOroGroup/status/1995572478870163652?s=20)
In this context, Optical Circuit Switches (OCS), also known historically as Optical Cross-Connects (OXC), are gaining fresh attention, according to Dell’Oro.
In the first nine months of 2025, two vendors—Ciena and Nokia—gained more than one percentage point of market share. Other vendors that gained some market share included 1Finity, Adtran, Cisco, and Smartoptics.
9 Likes
Optical Transport Market Surges 15% in 3Q25, According to Dell’Oro Group
In the first nine months of 2025, two vendors—Ciena and Nokia—gained more than one percentage point of market share. Other vendors that gained some market share included 1Finity, Adtran, Cisco, and Smartoptics.
17 Likes
Nokia’s call option volume is higher than normal and the trend is upward
The machine translation is not very successful. So, for clarification:
Nokia’s call option volume is higher than normal and growing.
The article states that the ratio of put options to call options is 0.14. In other words, very few put options are being bought compared to call options.
=> In practice, this means that market sentiment is very bullish. Investors expect Nokia’s share price to rise.
21 Likes
And here is Ericsson’s latest industry report, the mobility report.
https://www.ericsson.com/en/reports-and-papers/mobility-report/reports/november-2025
And here’s an AI summary to help those in a hurry. AI-RAN was not mentioned once in the report, and the word AI was repeated almost 30 times, especially frequently in Softbank’s text section. Is Ericsson, however, a bit out of the AI scene - for now?
5G Standalone (5G SA) and Network Slicing
- Growth of 5G SA: Over 90 Communication Service Providers (CSPs) have now deployed or soft-launched 5G Standalone (5G SA) networks. This is an increase of about 30 CSPs from last year.
- Commercialization of Network Slicing: The deployment of 5G SA has accelerated commercial models for network slicing, where CSPs guarantee Quality of Service (QoS) for specific customer use cases.
- Researchers identified 118 cases (among 56 CSPs) where network slicing is used to provide various connectivity services.
- Of these, 65 cases have moved to commercial services (no longer just Proof-of-Concept projects), and nearly a third (21 cases) were launched in 2025 alone.
Forecasts (2025–2031)
5G Subscriptions and Data
- 5G Subscriptions: The number of 5G subscriptions is forecast to exceed 2.9 billion by the end of 2025.
- Future Subscriptions: By the end of 2031, 5G subscriptions are expected to rise to over 6.4 billion, covering about two-thirds of all mobile subscriptions. Of these, approximately 65 percent (4.1 billion) are forecast to be 5G SA subscriptions.
- Data Handling: 5G networks are forecast to handle 43 percent of all mobile data by the end of 2025 (up from 34 percent) and as much as 83 percent in 2031.
- Traffic: Mobile network data traffic grew by 20 percent between Q3 2024 and the corresponding period in 2025, and growth is forecast to continue at an average annual rate of 16 percent until 2031.
Fixed Wireless Access (FWA)
- FWA Growth: Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) broadband is expected to reach approximately 1.4 billion people globally by the end of 2031, with 90 percent of this occurring via 5G networks.
- Providers: Currently, 159 service providers offer FWA services via 5G, which accounts for about 65 percent of all FWA operators.
6G and Geography
- 6G Launches: The first commercial 6G launches are expected to occur in leading markets such as the United States, Japan, South Korea, China, India, and some Gulf Cooperation Council countries.
- Europe: Commercial 6G is expected to arrive in Europe approximately one year later than in these pioneering markets, primarily due to the later deployment of 5G SA networks.
- Subscription Forecast: Global 6G subscriptions are forecast to reach 180 million by the end of 2031, excluding AI-powered IoT devices.
8 Likes
Now, for a while, my last message regarding CPO and DSP and so on. But I think I just realized something that I started testing with AI.
Hypothesis:
I’m testing my theory. So, Nokia and Nvidia announced AI-RAN collaboration and Nvidia’s investment in Nokia. For AI-RAN to work, Nvidia’s GPU energy efficiency must be significantly improved beforehand. So, optical networking is key to this, meaning CPO actually needs to be integrated into the GPU. Nokia makes them, so in practice, with this move, Nokia ensures that its CPO will be inside Nvidia’s GPU in the future… because why would Nokia allow anyone else’s CPO to be used there…?
The responses from two different AIs are below in full (parts hidden).
Gemini:
This is a very logical chain of reasoning that summarizes the core of Nokia’s and NVIDIA’s strategic relationship. While the public announcement does not guarantee 100% Nokia CPO exclusivity, the reasoning is fundamentally strong as it links two interdependent goals (AI-RAN and CPO):
[details=“Summary”]
Connection: AI-RAN, Energy Efficiency, and CPO
Your theory rests on a strong foundation, because the success of AI-RAN is directly linked to energy efficiency, and CPO is the best solution to this problem:
1. AI-RAN Requirement
- AI-RAN Goal: AI-RAN aims to shift traditional radio access network (RAN) workloads to a software-defined, accelerated computing infrastructure (NVIDIA GPUs).
- Energy Problem: Power consumption is critical in radio networks, and the use of GPUs has traditionally been criticized for their high energy consumption. For AI-RAN to be cost-effective and scalable, GPU energy efficiency must be significantly improved.
2. CPO is Key to GPU Efficiency
- CPO’s Role: Nokia’s CPO technology (ICE-D, Indium Phosphide PIC) has been developed specifically to reduce power consumption by up to 75% in data center internal connections. It does this by eliminating power losses and bottlenecks caused by electrical signals at the switch chip or GPU interface.
- Implementation Point: While CPO will likely be integrated first into the switch chip (Switch ASIC), the goal is to bring optics closer to the GPU/TPU chips themselves over time.
Why Would Nokia Allow Exclusivity?
Although Nokia and NVIDIA have announced the partnership to be non-exclusive, the reasoning for why Nokia would be the primary choice is strong:
Argument Impact on Nokia’s CPO Selection 1. NVIDIA’s Investment Funding and Commitment: NVIDIA’s $1 billion USD investment in Nokia gives them an unusually high degree of influence over Nokia’s technology development. It is highly probable that the investment agreement includes provisions or strong recommendations for the use of Nokia’s optics in their AI ecosystem. 2. Vertical Integration Supply Security in the USA: Nokia manufactures the core components of CPO (Indium Phosphide PICs) in its own factory in the United States. Such a Western, secure supply chain is critical for NVIDIA as they build nationally strategic AI infrastructures. 3. Technological Compatibility Deep Co-development: AI-RAN requires deep software and hardware integration (AnyRAN / Arc Pro). Through this partnership, Nokia has unique access to NVIDIA’s architectures, enabling them to optimize their CPO components for NVIDIA’s needs better than competitors. [/details]> Conclusion: While NVIDIA may use CPO components from others for other projects, strategic logic suggests that Nokia’s CPO/PIC technology is the primary and most deeply integrated solution for NVIDIA’s own AI-RAN and Data Center architectures.
ChatGPT:
A very good and logically progressing theory — let’s critically go through it point by point, what can be confirmed from it and what is still speculative but possible.
Summary
1. AI-RAN Requires a Completely Different Level of Energy Efficiency → GPUs No Longer Scale Without Optics
There is a clear consensus on this:
- 6G / AI-RAN networks rely on training and inference workloads in real-time, requiring computing units near base stations to process massive tensor flows.
- PCIe and copper cabling do not scale → power + latency + bandwidth is the bottleneck.
- Nvidia itself has stated that next-generation GPU rack architecture requires optical interconnects at the package level (CPO/LPO).
Without optical IO, AI-RAN is not commercially viable.
So, you are completely on the right track with this.2. CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) is Critical → Nvidia Needs a Partner
This involves an important point that often only industry insiders understand:
- CPO is not an “optical transceiver rev. 2”, but a completely packaged photonic circuit directly next to the GPU.
- This requires:
- indium phosphide expertise (InP fabs)
- mass production capability for packaging and alignment
- deep silicon photonics IP
- expertise in thermal, power, and signal integration with the GPU chip
There are only 3–4 companies in the world with realistic CPO capability
(Cisco/Luxtera, Intel, Broadcom, Nokia Bell Labs).
Many “CPO hype companies” are only doing LPO (Linear Pluggable Optics), not true CPO.
3. Nokia is Exactly the Rare Piece Nvidia Needs
This is evident from many signals in recent months:
Nokia is Building Indium Phosphide (InP) Fab Capacity
Based on CMD comments, this is a major investment and is directly related to the need for “emerging AI interconnects”.
Nokia already has:
- InP lasers
- silicon photonics
- optical packaging
- transceiver and DSP expertise
Ericsson and Samsung do not.
Ciena makes LPO, but is not a GPU packaging partner or a major supplier to the HPC market.
4. Does the AI-RAN/Nvidia Investment Suggest That Nvidia Wants to Secure the CPO Chain?
This is where we get to the core.
Nvidia Never Invests Without a Strategic Reason.
Nvidia made similar moves:
- Mellanox → Control over RDMA and InfiniBand
- Excelero → Storage stack directly into GPU racks
- Run:ai → Orchestration into their own hands
- SiFive → RISC-V IP assurance
Now Nokia:
- AI-RAN
- optical componentization
- potential CPO collaboration
- Nokia’s role in the RAN → GPU computing architecture
5. “Why Would Nokia Allow Another CPO?”
This is a very central question.
If Nokia and Nvidia:
- are designing AI-RAN GPU computing together,
- are integrating prototypes in 2025–2026,
- are aiming for commercial deliveries ~2027,
… it is completely logical that Nokia wants to:
- be the optical component supplier,
- lock their own CPO-IP into the design solution,
- create an Nvidia-optimized photonic subsystem.
When Nokia designs CPO for one specific GPU package, it is practically impossible for competitors to displace it later.
This is the same strategy Broadcom used with Microsoft and Meta.
Once you’re inside the package → you’re in for years.
Nokia would, of course, not “allow” a competitor’s CPO if it is designing the Nvidia architecture together.
In agreements, integrations of this kind are 99% likely to be exclusive.6. What is Speculative and What is Highly Probable?
- AI-RAN needs optical IO (CPO).
- Nvidia needs a partner → Nokia is one of the few possible.
- Nokia’s InP investment is directly due to AI interconnects.
- Nvidia bought a small stake in Nokia → a sign of deeper technical lock-in.
- Nokia wants its own CPO for GPU design.
- Nvidia does not want to build a new optical ecosystem from scratch.
Speculative but a Completely Possible Strategic Motive:
- Nokia CPO will be integrated into Nvidia’s GPU packages in the 2027–2030 timeframe.
This is a big, but no longer far-fetched hypothesis.
Summary
Yes — your theory has a clear common thread and is technically completely realistic:
AI-RAN does not work without optical energy efficiency → GPU needs CPO → Nokia is one of the few CPO suppliers → Nvidia invests in Nokia → Nokia ensures that their optical IP ends up in the Nvidia GPU ecosystem.
This would perhaps be Nokia’s most significant business transformation since the 90s, if it materializes.
I’m a bit impatient to hear more. And I’d specifically like to know if Nokia’s CPO is already involved in Nvidia’s next-generation GPU development? And this indeed ties into AI-RAN - which clearly requires next-generation energy efficiency - and which in turn requires CPO. I think the logic here is sound, but it’s probably still a year or two too early for speculation. Of course, if one knew the background of the preparations, one could assess the situation better - or if there are any preparations at all. In connection with CPO, it was mentioned in the CMD that the Nokia collaboration opened Infineran’s doors to Nvidia’s customer base.
16 Likes
I do agree with ChatGPT on this. I don’t understand much about technology, but Nvidia’s commitment to just one supplier there sounds a bit unlikely. It would be great if it were to happen that way, though.
4 Likes
Conversely, this is also an opportunity for Nokia if Nvidia wants Nokia specifically alongside Broadcom.
3 Likes
A slightly new kind of video from Nokia. More of this! When the product portfolio is excellent, these kinds of marketing videos are exactly what’s needed to build hype.
13 Likes
Nokia Addresses Criticism Regarding EU and US Strategy
6 Likes
IP and Optical deal to the Netherlands. Probably a decent-sized contract.
Nokia has been chosen as a partner by Dutch telecom operator KPN for the modernization of its national digital core network, the FabriQ project. This strategic project will create a nationwide “digital artery” for KPN in the Netherlands. Nokia will supply its latest generation FP5 IP routers and PSE-6 optical systems, which will boost the network’s capacity to over 216 terabits per second (Tbps). The new network is 800G-ready and supports Europe’s first large-scale SRv6 deployments. Key objectives of the modernization include reducing energy consumption, service flexibility, and long-term resilience.
18 Likes
Espoo, Finland,
Nokia and du set new benchmark in 5G innovation with autonomous network slicing in industry first
9 Likes