Engcon: What's so special about tiltrotators, and why is the company so profitable?

I’ve been contemplating the market potential a bit more myself.

ChatGPT has estimated those excavator populations. It’s worth noting that not nearly all countries are even included here. The 2030 penetration rate estimate is taken from the Q3 2025 presentation.

The largest market is, of course, the USA. China is completely missing from this, as is Japan.

Even if, for example, the USA were to grow only to 4% with annual growth at 26%, there would still be an endless market remaining. I would also estimate that pricing is higher in the US, so in addition to volume, unit sales are also more valuable.

For example, Germany, as the second largest market on the list, is interesting. Germany alone has significantly more equipment than the high-penetration Nordic countries.

Here’s also a “blurry” graph of management’s estimates since the IPO. For example, the US estimate at the IPO stage was on the high side.

On the other hand, good development has been seen in the Netherlands, Germany, and Austria.

kuva

So, there is a market, but how will it develop and what is Engcon’s share?

4 Likes

Rakennuslehti had an article about this Finnish company. The article highly praised its own device, claiming its features are better than other tiltrotators. Its smaller size was mentioned, which is due to the heart-shaped hydraulic torque device.

The device therefore fits into tighter spaces. Also, hydraulic hoses are not an obstacle.

Additionally, the device’s tilt angle is larger, 2x50, compared to 2x45 for other manufacturers. I myself cannot say how much significance that really has in practice. Perhaps @Kuokkavieras would have information about these?

Rotyx is still very small compared to Engcon

3 Likes

This domestic Rotyx device is indeed interesting. I’d immediately want to put on my Finland-tinted glasses, play Den glider in, and declare Finland’s victory in the excavator international match in the town square. However, the matter is not quite so straightforward.

An old-new invention. Germans launched such a tiltrotator already about ten years ago. The manufacturer was Kinshoffer and the product name NOX. The exact same idea as Rotyx, implemented with different technical solutions. The same tilt angles compared to the domestic competitor. The idea is very good, and some units have been sold in Finland over the years. However, greater success did not come, as the product did not withstand Nordic conditions, and repairing the device proved to be very expensive. A simplified example: If the tilt hydraulic cylinder of an Engcon tiltrotator breaks, it can be replaced quickly as a single part, and replacement is easy. If something broke in a NOX, the fault was usually inside the device, requiring the device to be disassembled, and repairs were more expensive, both in terms of parts and labor. Added to this was the machine’s downtime.

In the long run, this leads to a used machine with a NOX being difficult to sell, and the tiltrotator no longer adds value. Often quite the opposite. The same suspicion applies to Rotyx, although I have no personal experience with its durability. This also applies to tilts from other smaller manufacturers when changing machines. In contrast, a used machine equipped with a major brand tiltrotator sells well, the price is better, and it’s a safer option for the buyer.

As major brands, Engcon, Rototilt, and Steelwrist set the guidelines. In Finland, also Marttiini, whose product is proven good. However, on a large scale, a really small competitor.

My own analysis: The market will likely be divided among the three biggest players. Tiltrotators have also come to other parts of the world to stay, as the Nordics have shown. The question is only how quickly this happens, as the industry is quite conservative. Good successes have already been seen, for example, in France and the United States. The French deal mentioned in previous messages was rare in that it went directly to the end-user. Usually, tiltrotators are sold through machine dealers with a new machine. I could imagine the margin also being different when going directly to the end-user.

I truly hope that domestic Rotyx or Marttiini can reach the podium in this race. While waiting, ABBA plays on the radio.

5 Likes

Engcon and Komatsu are deepening their cooperation. New machines are available from the factory with an Engcon tiltrotator or tiltrotator readiness.

A comparison to the automotive world: A brand selling cars to much of the rest of the world would start offering the possibility to buy Nokian Tyres Hakkapeliitta 10s as factory-installed winter tires. Not bad.

6 Likes

A Finnish company is challenging Engcon and other established players with its new technology, which is reported to be more compact and require less maintenance than traditional tiltrotators. The breakout force is touted as superior, and torque is better maintained at the bucket’s extreme positions. Rotyx’s technology is not the only one operating without external cylinders, but it nonetheless features patented solutions.

9 Likes

Kuokkavieras analyzed those very points just a few messages ago.

I was also referring to that same article. To me, it felt more like an advertisement than a magazine article.

But it’s difficult to evaluate the devices when you have no practical experience.

There are surely pros and cons to each of the different technologies.

1 Like

Off the top of my head, if you’re scooping something a bit coarser/stonier, a rock slipping against the cylinder will break it. Oil spills out or the piston bends, etc. Even a small hit when digging in a tight spot damages the mechanism. It also occurs to me that a cylinderless design is generally stronger. These thoughts came to mind while digging—my nose, that is.

1 Like

Kuokkavieras analyzed those very things just a few messages ago.

Indeed they did, already back in November, and they were apparently very much on top of industry developments. Regardless, I linked this fresh article about the same company.

1 Like