My criticism has focused on transactions made with close associates over the years, two products (DiWa & Moments) and their announced customer relationships, as well as the company’s governance in general.
So I don’t quite understand why I should comment on a deal made in the US, where the customer, the product sold, and the value/duration of the contract are unknown. It’s quite amusing that a few days after that press release, a separate “don’t get too excited” stock exchange release had to be published.
I also wouldn’t be surprised if several similar announcements were made during the spring. The core product, upon which the company was originally built, can certainly be sold to Western countries from time to time. Especially if a large and well-known entity is selling it globally for a commission.
However, all the raised questions and ambiguities are still on the table, and personally, I find it very difficult to see a Finnish small investor being in a very good position with a company managed in this way in the future.