In my opinion, this was excellent brand communication slipped into the reply. First, the critic’s use of time is pointed out as useless even to themselves, the adoption of the perspective is shown to be artificial, and generally but objectively the quality of the discussion is assessed as poor… then as a final remark Nordnet is already for this
It nicely taps into the swarm intelligence whose accessibility at Inderes is in a class of its own.
It’s not my intention to take a stance on the criticism being responded to, and everyone deserves direct but factual feedback sometimes. But that’s a great remark. There’s something similar in that niche rivalry as That’s true, but it was last useful to someone when Pyysing had hair
Good lord, that’s radical. Surely this isn’t hinting that the investor is personally responsible for which country they want to see economic growth and increased wealth in?
I didn’t notice your comment until I checked what had been liked again.
It’s an investment-related quip because it encapsulates the core of leftist criticism: socialism doesn’t “take your job,” but rather the surplus value produced by the work. You get to keep the work, but not the fruits of your labor – they are redistributed or directed through the state.
“I don’t understand why one needs to hoard material possessions in the first place. I only ever hoard stock market investments—units of freedom, that is.”