Could you elaborate a bit more on what you mean by carelessness and what is becoming expensive here?
I checked the analyst’s comments on those publications, and in the “On the Threshold of a Growth Leap” publication, the recommendation was sell when the share price was EUR 4.14, and here is a quote from the analyst’s reasoning:
“Because Norrhydro consists of two businesses with very different outlooks (traditional hydraulic cylinders and NorrDigi), we primarily value the company using a sum-of-the-parts model, but also a DCF model. Our sum-of-the-parts model gives the share a value of approximately 3.5-3.6 euros, with an average of 3.6 euros/share. Over 80% of the sum of the parts belongs to the traditional hydraulic cylinder business, which is easier to value. Our DCF model indicates a fair value of approximately 3.6 euros for the share. The share’s return/risk profile is unfavorable in the shorter term, as an increase in expected return above the required return would necessitate significantly better-than-expected earnings development in 2022-2024.”
In the “Near Future Secured” publication, the recommendation was reduce when the share price was EUR 3.77, and here again is a quote from the analyst’s reasoning:
“Norrhydro as an investment requires patience from the investor. Before successful ramp-up of production in the new factory and clear visibility of NorrDigi deliveries in the company’s numbers, positive drivers are key to maintaining confidence and the share price. In the short term, there may still be a shortage of these, even though the increase in revenue guidance was a positive surprise. The average of our sum-of-the-parts and DCF calculations indicates a value of 4.2-4.3 euros for the share. The total expected return of the share, however, is negative with both 2022 and 2023 multiples, and even with the 2024 multiple, it remains below our required return. In our opinion, relative valuation works quite poorly for Norrhydro with group numbers, as the multiples for 2022-2023 are clearly above the median of its peers.”
In my opinion, Erkki was indeed right in those recommendations, in hindsight, regarding the unattractive risk-reward ratio, and for the company, the risks materialized as the cylinder market collapsed while the new factory was brought into production readiness.