David Heard seemed to continue with “yes, it would be reckless”.
According to GTP5.2’s interpretation: David Heard’s “it would be reckless” almost certainly referred to non-public, market-sensitive information about the demand for optical components, capacity, and/or long-term customer agreements surrounding AI infrastructure and CPO. Commenting could have prematurely revealed Nokia’s negotiating power, customer relationships, or future earnings development – which is why he was stopped.
11 Likes