Here are Arttu’s comments on Kesko’s November. ![]()
Kesko’s November sales grew by 4%, supported by its two largest divisions. Organically, growth was slightly milder (1%). The development was commendable, especially in the consumer customer sales of the Grocery Trade division, while development elsewhere was somewhat stable. The group-level performance slightly exceeded our expectations, and so far, Q4 development has been better than our expectations. We will update our forecast figures at the latest after the December sales release or in our Q4 earnings preview.
When Kesko once again reached figures starting with 17 in November, I ran through my own scenarios one more time. And so it happened that we are once again on board with Kesko. I jumped off when Euribor climbed to around 2%. I remember being annoyed that I hadn’t dared to make the same move at 1% a moment earlier. When it climbed 2 percentage points in 5 months, the trend would have been clear even to a blind man halfway through…
Behind the decision is not a single fundamental change, but rather that in the updated scenario analysis, several different factors began to emerge, whose probability, according to my analysis, has steadily increased. In short, themes whose increasing probability drives Kesko’s value creation capability:
-
New Citymarkets: The competitiveness of Citymarkets has been clear for a while. But now we are in a situation where a couple have already opened this year, and 6 or 7 more are coming in the next few years. The main competitor in this category only has 4, and several of those are upgrades of “already strong S-markets.” At least Ideapark, Haapaniemi, Paavola, Ritaportti, Redi, and Espoo are capable of capturing new market share from the main competitor. In summary: In the growth of hypermarkets in the 2020s, the first half went to the Co-op, which was awake early, while in the latter half, Kesko, which was slightly late, is relatively stronger.
-
Logistics: The biggest investment will start paying for itself from late 2026 (Rauhala stated that initially there will be adjustments and warm-ups, and efficiency benefits will be measured out in H2/26). In addition, Nurmijärvi is expected to materialize as growing cash flow towards the end of the decade.
-
Customers’ purchasing power. In 2 years, consumers’ purchasing power has already improved by almost +5%. Next year, in 2026 (3-year), growth is expected to reach +7% - +8%. This means we will finally reach and possibly exceed the 2020 level. Continued steady wage development, moderate inflation, and tax cuts, especially in Kesko’s daily consumer goods trade core segments, provide a steady positive underlying sentiment for Kesko. Furthermore, consumers have aggressively paid down loans for 2 years, and buffers have already been accumulated in accounts – in other words, very sensible moves by Finnish consumers. Once these “mandatory and sensible” moves have been made, the increased purchasing power will translate relatively more strongly into Kesko’s revenue in 2026 than in 2024-25.
-
Scope and Probability of Alcohol Legislation: In my view, we are now far enough along in the government term’s work that I dare to increase the probability of this. In Kesko’s Wolt vs. the Co-op’s Starship deliveries, Kesko will have at least a temporary significant competitive advantage over the Co-op and Lidl. Tesco, Ocado, Auchan, and Woolworths have all reported the great importance of alcohol. Home-delivered alcohol has a relatively high share in home deliveries; it increases the average purchase and improves profitability. Many chains have also reported that alcohol is also a clear retention tool in e-commerce, meaning buyers remain customers longer and purchase more often. And when these results are reported from countries without an alcohol monopoly, I see no reason why this effect would not be even relatively greater in Finland. Kroger, Tesco, and WW have all actually stated that the most important product category as a driver of customer loyalty is alcohol?!? In the UK, Sainsbury has also reported that distance selling of alcohol improved store safety, reduced shoplifting, and increased staff job satisfaction. In summary: Finns + liberalizing alcohol monopoly + liberalizing alcohol legislation + evidence of alcohol’s significant positive impact on e-commerce from abroad + Kesko’s strong position in home deliveries = relative competitive advantage and value creation capability! By Q4/26 at the latest, Rauhala will report how “We have seen particularly strong growth in home deliveries, which has been boosted by the new opportunity to order drinks home for, for example, pre-Christmas parties.”
-
Wines and percentages? In addition, I have previously noted that generally in Finnish daily consumer goods trade, Kesko innovates, the Co-op copies a couple of years later, and Lidl minimizes. If/when alcohol percentages in Finnish grocery stores rise during this or the next government term, Kesko’s retailer model is best suited to capitalize on such changes. You have found Finland’s overwhelmingly best beer selections in Citymarkets for years. In Prismas, the selection has been gradually increased; Laune, Pirkkala, and Kupittaa have had 200 different beers in their selections for years! A week after wine becomes available in Finnish grocery stores, Hannu Aaltonen will have a 3x larger selection of wine than Turku’s best Alko in Hansakortteli – and at a lower price. And politically supporting this: the National Coalition Party, the Swedish People’s Party, the Greens, a large part of the Social Democrats, the Finns Party, and the Left Alliance – it’s only a matter of time. This change also represents a clear capture of market share from Alko, where margins are notoriously good, and every wine bottle buyer can find their own personal expert salesperson (whom the customer pays for). Kesko will sell its wine bottles for a euro less. The answer to “What would go well with…” can be found from AI and Google for free; at Alko, it costs at least a euro per bottle…
-
Changes in Pharmacy Legislation. Kesko benefits from the probable liberalization of pharmacy legislation, as over-the-counter medicines and health-related volume products become part of the daily grocery basket. It’s easy to increase purchase frequency and average purchase, utilizing an extensive store network and efficient logistics with lower unit costs than pharmacies. And of course, even if Plussa loses to the green card, it will easily beat pharmacies’ own loyalty programs in data monetization.
In these two previous points, in situations of change, Kesko’s retailer model is a clear advantage. Overall, I believe that Kesko overestimates the strategic benefits of the retailer model in digitalizing retail. And for value creation, it would be good if Kesko strategically further reduced its retailer dependence, as it has already done with Onninen and K-auto in recent years. The retailer model could be a good internal driver with a 20-25% share, but its strategic importance will diminish as omnichannel, digitalization, automated logistics, and the importance of data grow ever larger. But I admit that in these changes, the Retailer is at their best! In Lahti, the retailer experimented with the first self-service checkouts in a couple of years (when they were introduced in Finland), at the Co-op, the board of directors in the “bravest co-op” ponders for a year longer, and Lidl discovered their benefit 15 years after others. ![]()
- Trump. Trump’s nonlinear and unconventional straightforward foreign policy has so far brought a calmer situation to the Middle East, Armenia/Azerbaijan, and Rwanda. I would still not be giving the guy a Nobel, but in 4 years, we have not been this close to a moment when (Trump forces) we get a (bad) peace in Ukraine. I consider it unlikely that the war would continue for another year with this intensity. Trump has the desire, and the ability, to make the continuation of the war too expensive for Ukraine (and Europe) and Russia. So I consider the probability of a bad peace to be rather high in Q1-Q3/2026. This has direct, but above all, indirect positive effects on Kesko. It is difficult to see how consumer confidence would not react to peace. Consumer confidence is most visible for Kesko in hardware stores, construction, and car sales. In addition, the (partial) opening of the border/trade is probable and will significantly increase commercial activity in Finland. Will Kesko go to St. Petersburg? Not for a couple of decades. Will people from St. Petersburg come shopping as soon as the border is open? Certainly. The local Intersport in Lappeenranta near St. Petersburg will achieve the largest growth percentage in the entire Chain’s history in 2026. The retailer can send me a message next Christmas if I was right…

Is there a risk of stagnation in Kesko’s stock price? Absolutely. But I see that at the moment there is also the possibility of several factors contributing to growth and profitability.* None of the above happens? I consider it unlikely, but possible.
- 1-2 of the above happens? A good basic scenario.
- 3-4 of the above happens? The stock price surprises positively.
- 5-7 of the above happens? Kesko is a relative winner in the latter half of the 2020s in the world’s most profitable retail market.
As a Finnish consumer and a net contributor to our national economy, it is naturally sad to state that Kesko’s biggest moat is the Baltic Sea, an aging population, an impoverishing national economy, and the people. The cooperative store is kept in check by the competition authority at the latest, Lidl has its own small (world’s largest) corner, and the most challenging new competitor is on the level of Tokmanni. The queue of new chains for the Finnish market is quite short. We are reasonably protected. Let’s revisit this in Christmas 2026, to see how my scenarios played out. ![]()
Kesko is planning additional investments in Kuopio. A plot has been acquired, where a K-rauta might be built in the 2030s. Currently, the city’s third Cittari is under construction in Kuopio.
For all of Kesko and especially for Pirkkala Cittari, good visibility in IGD’s Must-see stores publication. Pirkkala Cittari has been selected for IGD’s (Institute of Grocery Distribution) international Must-see stores list. According to the press release, Pirkkala Cittari’s selection for the list was supported by the store’s active responsibility work (e.g., the Vieläkin hyvää - waste store), collaborations with various partners at the service counter and in meal and restaurant operations, the store’s own brewery and ice cream factory, as well as the store’s inventive marketing approach and product presentation.
About IGD itself, the following is stated, among other things: “a respected expert organization that monitors and analyzes global developments and trends in the retail sector. One of the tasks of IGD representatives is to visit and evaluate stores around the world. The Must-see stores list is one of IGD’s most popular annual publications.”
IGD’s publication can be found below. Reading it would require at least creating some kind of user account and logging in to the page.
Quite moderate. Even grocery inflation is at a higher level.
True, but it’s good when compared to the fact that Finns have tucked away 4 billion euros for 2025, meaning this money is gradually shifting into consumption.
The stock of deposits held by Finns has been rising year after year for a long time now. In 2022, it turned downward, but has since resumed its upward trajectory. Even though the sums are reaching new peaks in euro terms, the leap in real value compared to, for example, the pre-pandemic era is no longer as massive as one might initially think.
In my opinion, it’s a slightly strange idea that this money is somehow at a starting line waiting to return to consumption. Rather, it can be assumed that in the long run, the stock of deposits will continue to grow, although the growth rate may certainly slow down.
As a general observation and my own empirical finding, I think the offers in Kesko’s Mammuttimarkkinat have improved compared to before. Previously, there was the issue that Kesko’s promotional price was sometimes the same as the regular price at Tokmanni or a similar discount store. Now, the deals are genuinely affordable and no longer feel like a rip-off in the same way.
Happy 2026 to all forum participants! Before we head full speed into the new year, here are a few more looks back at the past:
- You can recap the events of late last year on our investor blog

- The full-year 2025 results will be published in exactly one month, on 5 February.
Before that, the December sales figures will be released in the middle of this month. - In addition, the final dividend installment for 2024 (€0.22/share) will be paid in January: ex-dividend date 12 Jan and payment date 20 Jan.
In terms of Kesko’s share price development, it is promising that the SMA 20 has risen above both the SMA 50 and the SMA 100 for the first time in a long while. Additionally, the share price is now attempting to climb above the SMA 200 (19.35).
The return of Choice cola:
@Kesko_IR has the manufacturer remained Olvi, as it was in the past?
Delighting thirsty handymen and others, the Pirkka First Choice soft drinks now returning to the selection are manufactured by the Finnish company Finnspring Ltd, which produces the majority of Kesko’s private label soft drinks.
Thank you for the answer. But a boo for the content of the reply. Before, the contents of the can were Olvi’s Classic Cola, but now it’s Finnspring’s sludge. In my opinion, this does not bring back the classic in accordance with the marketing promise.
Bring back the Pirkka BCAA Lemon and Tropical flavors manufactured by Finnspring, and in return, I can buy some pieces of Kesko for my offspring ![]()
I can’t make any promises, but I’ll pass your product request along ![]()
Kesko is strongly highlighting its product discount campaign, as today’s HS front page reported “over a thousand permanently low-priced products.”
Today, I actually observed, for instance, the affordable Pirkka 100% orange juice, 2 liters for 3 euros. This offer beats S Group hands down. If similar campaigns continue, S Group’s image of being affordable will certainly crumble.
It’s a battle over brand perceptions. In terms of quality, K Group beat S Group a long time ago, and at this rate, the price perception can be changed too.
There’s a bit of the truth regarding that price perception ![]()
Kesko won’t be able to compete in a price war against Lidl/S Group..
It’s better to focus on quality and selection instead..
That compares Lidl’s sale campaign prices to others’ regular prices. So it’s not the truth, just a Lidl advertisement. As far as I know, that’s not how grocery basket comparisons are usually done. Otherwise, I agree that K shouldn’t even try to get into a cutthroat price war.
If Kesko were to price its products or base its strategy on the advice from this board, I wonder where they would be now… put those never-ending price and gut-feeling personal experiences in the thread… reading the same thing 100 times is exhausting, just like this post…